HAI! Yes...Gil Hamilton wrote:Too true, our defense was balls. However, when a team scores legitimately and the ref disallows it with no rhyme or reason given (I thought he said offsides, but as it turns out, he didn't give a stated reason), that's robbery.SancheztheWhaler wrote:The ref made bad calls, but he didn't keep the US from winning; the US played hesitantly, seemed scared and confused (and lazy), and made critical mistakes early in the game. If they hadn't let in two goals, it wouldn't have mattered that the ref disallowed the third.
That ref should be out of a job, but at the same time, I can't blame him for the draw. The US let in two goals it shouldn't have, and that's where it ends for me. Without those two fuckups in the first half, it could have been 2-0 US. Instead, we (once again) had to come from behind. It would be nice not to have to come from behind, and simply play well for 90 minutes