#1 So you admit Mandatory diversity training is about ensuring no one has any thoughts you don't like. Replace douchebag with Jew and then get back to me on that one.
That is not what I said. You need to go learn how to read.
Not being a douchebag toward is not the same as "thought police".
I dont give a shit about what some slack jawed yokel in Alabama thinks about black people. I care about how they act. If they are not civil toward their black co-workers, they should not have a job. They should also be told what company policy is with respect to being un-civil toward black co-workers. The same goes for women, gay people etc.
Also here it is.
"Yeah. It does not bother me. Because heaven forbid a company or in my case university have a training seminar about not being a Jew toward co-workers."
That statement, the little noun replacement you asked me to make, does not make any sense. Moreover, douchebaggery is a set of behavior. It is not an immutable characteristic. It is also universally undesirable. If you start bullying your co-workers or handing out KKK pamphlets at work, you should be fired. Just Being a Jew In Public is not in any way objectionable.
#2 I'll see your gay vs lesbians and raise you blacks vs Hispanics & whites in platoon wrestling matches. Should the Hispanics have all been prosecuted for calling for 'white boy support'?
No. In fact your line of argument does not make any sense with respect to what I actually wrote. What, did you break your own nose with your own knee-jerk reaction to a reasonable position such that you were blinded by man-tears?
#3 Granted. All I said was an 'interaction' which is kinda vague, so I'll be more specific: a casual verbal interaction. You don't have the right to not be offended, especially in the world of grownups. I had a black Sergeant Major state to me that my headcold in Kuwait was due to white people having weaker immune systems. I was offended, but I looked it up and in the context of certain tropical diseases, he was right, but even if he had been wrong, it never would have occurred to me to complain about him and try to get him in trouble, because he is allowed to have an opinion and talk, even in public and stuff. It's called liberty.
Backpedal faster.
1. It is an NCOs job to give you shit. Even if he had been wrong, he was within his job description.
2. No one is going to report you for talking about the weather. That is a casual verbal conversation. Repeatedly complimenting a woman's hair is creepy.
3. Free speech requires the free and open exchange of ideas. It is not free license to sexually harass your co-workers. Your rights end where theirs begin. They should not have to leave their fucking job and risk destitution so you can continue to be a creep.
That is basic human decency.
I can count on two hands the number of decent men I know who, good men, have been divorced or abused by women working he system for cash & prizes.
And you know them to be good men how exactly? Do you see them every second of every day? LOTS of people think that someone else is good and decent because they dont know otherwise. Yes, abusive women exist. They should be stopped (obviously), yes people who take advantage of others for money are bad and should be stopped (obviously). But I also know that just about every abusive son of a bitch alive, when divorced, will claim that their wife was a gold-digging whore. Every unhappy marriage--even those without abuse--ends with both parties inflating a list of grievances that bears little to no relationship to reality. Especially when common property (part of every marriage in common law systems) gets divided up and child support becomes an issue.
So your pithy anecdotes mean exactly nothing.
