True, but here you have a lot of leaners, and to cut them without having to deal with barber chairs, you need to plunge-cut&trigger them, which is a real hassle when you need to cut from both sides in an already dangerous situation.His Divine Shadow wrote: ↑2023-02-28 05:26am
As for the size of trees, you can cut larger trees than the bar length by cutting from both sides. This is how was traditionally taught here anyway. You can use a larger bar but a larger bar is more tiring to wield and clumsier to limb with, though you don't have to bend over either with a long enough bar. Safety is generally considered here to be better with a shorter bar too.
Based on opinions on the net on local communities, 15" might be considered the new allround length it seems.
Also, we do have 99% HARDwood, mainly locust and oak, so we really need any extra tooth we can get to get some work donw without carrying a bag of spare chains. (Just for reference - local sawmills used to not charge per cut, but per dull bandsaw blade )
In a mostly pine environment, soft wood and straight growth, a smaller saw is perfectly fine, agreed, but I totally see why in the US - where locust and oak are also really common, they also prefer to have a longer bar, especially when you can only have one.
Also, I hate limbing bent over