Christina Aguilera in Playboy...sort of

Zaku-chan · Post by **Zaku-chan** » 2002-12-05 01:51pm

salm wrote:note that "throwing her body at the camera" cant be considered to be bad.

True, (chuckle) but it is when you're supposed to be a singer and you're not worrying about the music as much as your looks.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-05 01:53pm

Eh she's not that hard on the eyes.

As for talent...she might have more than Britany...but then again so does my next door neighbor parrot.

guyver · Post by **guyver** » 2002-12-05 02:06pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:How old is she, anyway?

She was born on Dec 18 1980 in NY.

I looked at imdb.com

I still would tag her or Ms. Spears or Jeri Ryan or any cute blonde

salm · Post by **salm** » 2002-12-05 02:12pm

Zaku-chan wrote:
salm wrote:note that "throwing her body at the camera" cant be considered to be bad.
True, (chuckle) but it is when you're supposed to be a singer and you're not worrying about the music as much as your looks.

ach... she´s not a pure singer. she´s a mtv star. she gets money for looking good, songs with catchy melodies and providing everybody who wants to see and pay for it with a good show.

there´s no problem with that. the people who watch it are happy because they think that they get some good music,
she and record company are happy because they make shit loads of money and can buy their cocaine rations with it
and i´m happy because i can switch to another channel if i want to.

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2002-12-05 02:16pm

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Christina Aguilera is a gelfling
And what, may I ask, is a gelfling?

IIRC that's the name of the elf like characters from Dark Crystal.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-12-05 02:56pm

I don't know why she needs to be a skank anyway. She still sold millions when she actually had chlothes on.

But hey, if you cut a record of a chalkboard being scratched with nails, and put a picture of a naked woman on the cover, it would go platinum.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2002-12-05 03:39pm

she looks like a stick in that picture. . .

salm · Post by **salm** » 2002-12-05 03:45pm

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:I don't know why she needs to be a skank anyway. She still sold millions when she actually had chlothes on.

But hey, if you cut a record of a chalkboard being scratched with nails, and put a picture of a naked woman on the cover, it would go platinum.

maybe she enjoys showing the whole world that she´s got an awsome body. nothing wrong with that either.
there´s nothing wrong with taking off your clothes in public!!!
not even if you´re a hot chick!
just try it on the next festival you go to.
get up on the stage and take out you dick, swing it around, and enjoy the crowd go "YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAA!!!"
the attention of 2000 people will be focused on you.
it´s really a load of fun.

Dodge · Post by **Dodge** » 2002-12-05 03:49pm

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:Aguleria's a real slut. Still, she has talent, something you didn't find in Britney.

Well, I want to know who I would choose if I found them both in my bed...?

Zaku-chan · Post by **Zaku-chan** » 2002-12-05 03:52pm

salm wrote:*snips*

But you shouldn't get paid millions for doing something any half hot girl can do.

salm · Post by **salm** » 2002-12-05 03:58pm

Zaku-chan wrote:
salm wrote:*snips*
But you shouldn't get paid millions for doing something any half hot girl can do.

life´s not fair.
she´s the lucky bastard who won the casting.
she seems to be a good entertainer for the masses as well. i´m not sure if any half hot girl could do that. it´s not like she´s a one hit wonder. she´s been getting paid millions for a couple of years now which is a pretty long time in the pop business. she must have something that the other chicks dont have ( besides this bit of luck mentioned above to attain the job)

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2002-12-05 03:59pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:If that was the only port, I'd rather crash into the rocks.

God, she's such a skank. She should have the biohazard mark tattooed on her forehead.

That aint the only place it should be tattooed.

irishmick79 · Post by **irishmick79** » 2002-12-05 04:01pm

There is such a thing as too skinny. It looks like if the wind blows too hard, she'd break.

Icehawk · Post by **Icehawk** » 2002-12-05 04:30pm

She better be wearing something that borderlines as nudity because I will be pissed if its not better than the stuff they show in Maxim.

I don't care if she's a skank, I still think she's hot and would gladly fuck her until her mortal mind has gone insane if I had a chance.

salm · Post by **salm** » 2002-12-05 05:04pm

Icehawk wrote:She better be wearing something that borderlines as nudity because I will be pissed if its not better than the stuff they show in Maxim.

I don't care if she's a skank, I still think she's hot and would gladly fuck her until her mortal mind has gone insane if I had a chance.

aaah, finally a post that makes sense.

Lord Pounder · Post by **Lord Pounder** » 2002-12-05 05:25pm

i wouldn't touch her. Look at her, she is obviously ill. She lookes like she hasn't eaten a meal in like 10 years. Personally i detest skinny chicks, they look like you would break them if you so much as looked at them wrong. and women with ribs that stick out further than their boobs are such a turn off.

Falkenhorst · Post by **Falkenhorst** » 2002-12-05 06:32pm

Remember, skankiness has an attractive quality all it's own...

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2002-12-06 12:22am

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Christina Aguilera is a gelfling
And what, may I ask, is a gelfling?

Ever seen the Dark Crystal?

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2002-12-06 12:25am

guyver wrote:
GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:
guyver wrote:Got this from http://www.mrskin.com

Los Angeles, CA.
From Askmen.com:

Christina Aguilera plays a skanky ho in her "Dirrty" music video, and now she's going to pose in one of the most famous nudie magazines out there... that's right, Playboy.

But wait, there's more. The new and (debatably) improved Christina will not be taking it all off. She will be the first-ever celebrity featured non-nude in the magazine's history. But don't you worry, Christina has a unique way of making herself look very slutty with her clothes on... sluttier than she could ever attempt to make herself look whilst naked.

Nevertheless, I know that men worldwide will be looking forward to seeing Christina in compromising positions, dressed or otherwise...
See Medusa naked? Only if they take the minimalist approach to her hair and makeup they did when she first started out. Otherwise she looks like friggin' Medusa of the Gorgons.

She is not that bad..take a look

Ahhh, but you see, they've left her hair alone and taken a more subdued approach to her makeup. Now she just looks rather emaciated. The lighting in that shot sucks . . . and she is rather emaciated and skinny.

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2002-12-06 12:29am

salm wrote:
Zaku-chan wrote:
salm wrote:*snips*
But you shouldn't get paid millions for doing something any half hot girl can do.
life´s not fair.
she´s the lucky bastard who won the casting.
she seems to be a good entertainer for the masses as well. i´m not sure if any half hot girl could do that. it´s not like she´s a one hit wonder. she´s been getting paid millions for a couple of years now which is a pretty long time in the pop business. she must have something that the other chicks dont have ( besides this bit of luck mentioned above to attain the job)

To be perfectly accurate, she's now a two hit wonder.

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-06 12:30am

She looks like Stick-Figure Barbie in that picture.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Christina Aguilera in Playboy...sort of

Re: Christina Aguilera in Playboy...sort of