Mayabird wrote:It's possible that Shep had read about vegans not getting vitamin B12 in their diets (since it is only acquired thorugh eating meat) and was thinking of that when he wrote the "unbalanced diet" thing. The Jains only survived because their foot was infested enough with insects that the little bits of bugs that they ate accidentally provided them with enough vitamin B12 for them. Plekhanov, I'm guessing that you do take supplements for the missing B12. Am I right? The human body doesn't need much and can store away it for years, but you need a little bit to live, and if it's not meat it has to come from somewhere else.
Thanks for the info I think I’m safe though as I'm what’s technically known as a lacto-ovo-vegetarian, which means I eat dairy products and eggs but no other animal products, not a vegan (which would be far too much trouble for someone who’s dominant characteristic is laziness) so B12 isn’t problem.
jenat-lai wrote:snip
Apology/explanation for your being a jerk accepted. I hope you realise that just because of the 4 people (a pathetically small sample size to base a judgement upon) you know with a certain characteristic 3 are annoying and the other doesn’t want to swap bodily fluids it doesn’t give you the right to unload on another unconnected individual who happens to share the characteristic.
Andrew J. wrote:You do realize, of course, that animals are not killed "on demand" for the people that want to eat them. Your decision not to eat meat-and indeed, the sum total of every vegetarian and vegan in America, if not the world-has had just about zero effect on the total number of animals killed by the meat industry. So, to me, it does seem a a little pointless.
In other words, don't think of it as killing other animals and eating them, think of it as finding a dead animal someone else killed and eating that.
Congratulations you have come up with probably the worst argument against vegetarianism so far in this thread, I wouldn’t really know about the US but there a several million vegetarians in the UK the market for vegetarian food is worth hundreds of millions/billions a year, that’s money that would otherwise have been spent on dead animals the effect may be small but its still there.
I’m well aware that I’m an individual in a world of billions and that in the big picture my actions don’t count, so what? I don’t care if I’m the only vegetarian on earth the fact is I’m morally responsible for my own actions and I choose not to contribute to the upkeep of an industry I believe to be morally wrong.
Your argument is essentially everybody else is doing it so why don’t you? Would you also have applied this to an abolitionist in the old south? Someone who refused to loot in a riot? A member of the Red Army who chose not to rape German women?
And what's with the "horrible, painful death" stuff? I was under the impression that animals were slaughtered more or less instantly. You make it sound like they're drawn and quartered or something.
"a horrible, painful death" was a direct quote from the post by BkbrryTheGreat that I was responding to. This is not a thread about the evils of eating meat or an attempt to convert anybody I wish people would stop treating it as if it was, I was simply pointing out my surprise and dismay at finding out that most beer has fish in it.
Stofsk wrote:Personally, the best argument I've ever heard of in support of vegetarianism is the straight and simple admission of: "I simply don't like the taste." You can't argue with that, even if you may not agree.
Sadly I can’t use that one as whilst really don’t care for meat I am tempted by seafood.
However, claiming vegetarianism somehow reduces the level of suffering in animal slaughter is dubious.
My being vegetarian reduces the amount of animal suffering I’m personally responsible for that’s good enough for me.