Spider-Man 3 trailer tonight
Posted: 2006-11-09 09:11pm
CBS and I believe MTV are both showing it tonight at ten.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=100408
He could have lost the mask during the battle.Jim Raynor wrote: -Like I've been saying, I've been VERY concerned about the the possible shafting of Harry Osborn. You know, the story arc they spent the last two movies building up. He doesn't even look like he'll be taking on the Green Goblin persona, wearing a generic, maskless suit instead. Way to downplay the guy who should be the main villain. Instead, it looks like Peter will just utterly PWN his ass while wearing the symbiote. Harry may just turn out to be a sacrificial lamb, beaten or killed off to show how hardcore the symbiote is.
That's fairly similar to what the Ultimate explanation is. So it would have some basis in the comics.Jim Raynor wrote:The symbiote will probably be explained away as "nanotech" or something.
It's a spoiler considering that it's aimed at a general audience and that they spent most of the trailer setting up how the costume is a Big Bad Thing, which gets undermined if we see Tobey Macguire tearing off the costume. Of course I know that this was how Parker rid himself of the symbiote originally. I'm thinking of Tom, Dick and Harry who haven't read a Spider-man comic.Jim Raynor wrote:I don't think it's much of a spoiler to see Peter tearing off the symbiote. It happened in the comics, and it's a necessity if Brock is to become Venom.
Yeah, trailers suck.If anything, I think seeing Peter chuck a fucking exploding bomb into Harry's face is a bigger spoiler.
*grumbles about how there was no SECRET WAR movie*The symbiote will probably be explained away as "nanotech" or something.
From the way the scenes play out, it looks like he beats the shit out of Harry and then decides to get rid of the suit after seeing what he's done.Stofsk wrote:Yeah, trailers suck.If anything, I think seeing Peter chuck a fucking exploding bomb into Harry's face is a bigger spoiler.
If you're saying that because you think the Symbiote deserves a movie completely dedicated to it... I agree.Jim Raynor wrote:Over at Superhero Hype, there's a lot of fanboys complaining...because the trailer doesn't show Venom. The symbiote suit shouldn't have been in this movie period.
LOL...ah retconning. It's not for comic books anymore. Marvel already infected the movies with it.Jim Raynor wrote:-Looks like the Sandman is no throwaway, "goon" villain as many people speculated. Now he's being retconned into Uncle Ben's REAL killer. A major plot is that Peter wants revenge on this guy. And people thought there would be no problems fitting him, Harry, and the symbiote all in one movie.
Yeah, saw that as well...and they really want to play up a "Bad" Peter angle....ugh.-The symbiote costume looks like the main focus of the movie. At least it's tied to the Sandman plot, taking away Peter's inhibitions and making him more willing to kill in revenge.
It's looking from the first trailer is that is all she is. She's the Hot Blonde that Peter goes after because he's the BAD BOY.-Gwen Stacey (who I don't think should even be in the movie, given the glut of characters and plots, and the fact that her most famous moment was already used up on MJ in the first movie) wasn't even mentioned, and only briefly seen. Will she be a throwaway minor cameo (perhaps a piece of ass that Peter cheats on MJ with, while wearing the evil suit), or did the trailer just leave her out?
And leave way for Peter to confront Uncle Ben's TRUE KILLER(Dun, dun, dunnnnnn). Which of course makes you question why did Raimi build up Osborn so fucking much for two movies.-Like I've been saying, I've been VERY concerned about the the possible shafting of Harry Osborn. You know, the story arc they spent the last two movies building up. He doesn't even look like he'll be taking on the Green Goblin persona, wearing a generic, maskless suit instead. Way to downplay the guy who should be the main villain. Instead, it looks like Peter will just utterly PWN his ass while wearing the symbiote. Harry may just turn out to be a sacrificial lamb, beaten or killed off to show how hardcore the symbiote is.
Considering there's no Secret Wars this time around, perhaps they're going the Ultimates route this time again (as otherwise they've got no real explanation for the Symbiote). In which case she doesn't die getting thrown off a bridge, but leaves Peter feeling equally responsible. (Even if it doesn't feel quite as 'real' in terms of what he did). But yeah. . .way too many characters. The Spiderman franchise is starting to suffer from the same thing that made Batman sink, though not quite to the same degree of suckitude. Yet.Ghost Rider wrote:It's looking from the first trailer is that is all she is. She's the Hot Blonde that Peter goes after because he's the BAD BOY.-Gwen Stacey (who I don't think should even be in the movie, given the glut of characters and plots, and the fact that her most famous moment was already used up on MJ in the first movie) wasn't even mentioned, and only briefly seen. Will she be a throwaway minor cameo (perhaps a piece of ass that Peter cheats on MJ with, while wearing the evil suit), or did the trailer just leave her out?
X-Men managed to pull it off fairly well, especially since they had a virtual infinite pool of story ideas to pull off their movies from. Unfortunately changing directors in the third made it suck considerably, mainly because of the director shift, but in something like this I can imagine it would be good if there were an obvious direction planned for it, instead of simply adding in villain after villain ala Batman. Since a good deal of the popular superhero comics definitely have some type of direction they're heading for, or at least trying to work toward. Even Spiderman's not completely devoid of material that they couldn't have tied things in together with the previous movies a little more coherently with the Green Goblin arc and Harry going the vengeance route for his dad's death.Darth Wong wrote:I actually think that it's really, really difficult to make sequels to superhero movies in general, because of the nature of the genre. The best part of a superhero movie is the origin story. After that comes the "learning to accept his newfound powers/deformity/responsibility/whatever phase". And after that? An endless parade of new villains. The first two phases are cool, but after that, it just gets tedious.
Actually, the first X-Men just was not all that great. The second one was awesome. The third one was, well, third-rate.General Zod wrote:X-Men managed to pull it off fairly well, especially since they had a virtual infinite pool of story ideas to pull off their movies from. Unfortunately changing directors in the third made it suck considerably, mainly because of the director shift, but in something like this I can imagine it would be good if there were an obvious direction planned for it, instead of simply adding in villain after villain ala Batman. Since a good deal of the popular superhero comics definitely have some type of direction they're heading for, or at least trying to work toward. Even Spiderman's not completely devoid of material that they couldn't have tied things in together with the previous movies a little more coherently with the Green Goblin arc and Harry going the vengeance route for his dad's death.
I hope it isn't the Ultimate Version symbiote. Part of Me thinks that they will use the Spidey Animated Series explanation which is like the comics minus the Secret Wars storyline. It seems like they were trying to set it up with pointlessly including John Jameson the astronaut in SM2. To me that is probably the best way to introduce the symbiote in a film if you aren't going to have the Secret Wars backstory.General Zod wrote:Considering there's no Secret Wars this time around, perhaps they're going the Ultimates route this time again (as otherwise they've got no real explanation for the Symbiote). In which case she doesn't die getting thrown off a bridge, but leaves Peter feeling equally responsible. (Even if it doesn't feel quite as 'real' in terms of what he did). But yeah. . .way too many characters. The Spiderman franchise is starting to suffer from the same thing that made Batman sink, though not quite to the same degree of suckitude. Yet.Ghost Rider wrote:It's looking from the first trailer is that is all she is. She's the Hot Blonde that Peter goes after because he's the BAD BOY.-Gwen Stacey (who I don't think should even be in the movie, given the glut of characters and plots, and the fact that her most famous moment was already used up on MJ in the first movie) wasn't even mentioned, and only briefly seen. Will she be a throwaway minor cameo (perhaps a piece of ass that Peter cheats on MJ with, while wearing the evil suit), or did the trailer just leave her out?