Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger?

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Lord MJ
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1562
Joined: 2002-07-07 07:40pm
Contact:

Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger?

Post by Lord MJ »

Mike Wong this is a question for you.


If anyone else has knowledge about this let me know.


I'm planning on buying a Linksys 5 port Ethernet + 802.11b Wireless router for $99 from Amazon.com.


A couple of associates of mine who are Computer and Electrical Engineers at Georgia Tech. They said that it wouldn't be a good idea to put such a device in my dorm room. Prolonged exposure and close proximity to a source of 2.8ghz radio waves isn't good for you. I'm Computer Science at GT, so I haven't had to much instruction about radio waves and signals beyond my Physics courses and my telecommunications classes.

Is there any real danger here? Or can I safely have this thing in my room?
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.

Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
EmperorMing
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3432
Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
Location: The Lizard Lounge

Post by EmperorMing »

There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.

Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you... :wink:
Image

DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck

Kill your God!
User avatar
Shinova
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2002-10-03 08:53pm
Location: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Post by Shinova »

EmperorMing wrote:There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.

Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you... :wink:

And this is from pure speculation, but hardline would be much more efficient and quicker as well :D
User avatar
EmperorMing
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3432
Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
Location: The Lizard Lounge

Post by EmperorMing »

Shinova wrote:
EmperorMing wrote:There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.

Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you... :wink:

And this is from pure speculation, but hardline would be much more efficient and quicker as well :D
I would say so... :wink:
Especially when moving *large* files around... :P
Image

DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck

Kill your God!
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

I would worry most about interference with other household devices that operate in the 2.8Ghz range. I think the latest cordless phones work in that range.

As for health concerns I would not worry at all.
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Cordless phones are either 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Get a hardline or one of those new "network-over-your-electrical-grid" thingys. Better for security reasons.
Image Image
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Darth Wong wrote:Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.

Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
An uncle of mine worked at one of DEW or such radio installations in Greenland in the '50's. Him and a lot of his fellow workers got cancer and I mean an odd proporition.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
CmdrSweevo
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 128
Joined: 2002-08-27 05:53am

Post by CmdrSweevo »

EmperorMing wrote:
Shinova wrote:
EmperorMing wrote:There shouldn't be anything to be afraid of in that setup.

Then again I preffer a hardline as opposed to wireless. Just a little paranoid, mind you... :wink:

And this is from pure speculation, but hardline would be much more efficient and quicker as well :D
I would say so... :wink:
Especially when moving *large* files around... :P
And it's less of an adventure trying to set it up. Took me a week to find the magic order I had to boot the computers in to get a connection. That was after I had to fix the ISDN drivers it trashed.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation. There has never been any evidence that non-ionizing radiation, barring monster doses, has any detrimental effect on living tissue. Some studies have linked increased rates of bacterial growth in a petri dish to strong EM radiation or magnetic fields (albeit in HUGE amounts), but the obvious rebuttal is that even in this case, it was probably due to simple heating, and the bacteria weren't harmed; they just became more energetic.

Basically, this is more of a superstition than a serious threat. They will point out that it's always POSSIBLE, but lots of things are possible. There are supposedly some shaky statistical correlations between certain types of cancer and cell-phone use, but I have yet to see any reputable research to bear that up; it sounds more like sensationalist scare tactics to me.
An uncle of mine worked at one of DEW or such radio installations in Greenland in the '50's. Him and a lot of his fellow workers got cancer and I mean an odd proporition.
Assuming that the EW radars were to blame, there's a huge difference between that linksys router and those things.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Re: Wireless Routers, Hubs, Network points, Radiation Danger

Post by phongn »

Lord MJ wrote:Mike Wong this is a question for you.

If anyone else has knowledge about this let me know.

I'm planning on buying a Linksys 5 port Ethernet + 802.11b Wireless router for $99 from Amazon.com.
While that router is perfectly acceptable, I would not suggest buying their WLAN cards. Go with Proxim's Orinoco line or Cisco's Aironet 350 line. They are more expensive, but offer far greater performance.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

There are ways to secure your WLAN. Some guy on the ArsTechnica boards posted a free-for-personal-use tunnelling client and server which some people are trying out there.

Enable WEP. Yeah, it's insecure, but it'll take on the order of five hours to crack it, so it's at least a layer of security.
User avatar
Colonel Olrik
The Spaminator
Posts: 6121
Joined: 2002-08-26 06:54pm
Location: Munich, Germany

Post by Colonel Olrik »

I have a wireless network at home, and so far nobody has died.. We have four computers most of the time online, and we never turn off the network server..
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Working in close proximity to a major transmitter or radar array is a monster dose. Monster doses of pretty much anything can be extremely hazardous, even sunlight. That does not mean that infinitesimal doses should be feared.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Post Reply