Page 1 of 1

Kasparov Blinked

Posted: 2003-02-07 09:09pm
by Patrick Degan
Today was the terminal game in the first organised FIDE Man v. Machine championship match, squaring off current human champion Gary Kasparov against Deep Junior, the latest contender from IBM.

After initial deployments and some positioning moves to feel out Deep Junior's strategy, Kasparov, playing black and gaining a pawn within the first twelve moves, had managed an early queen exchange; a good strategy against a computer since the removal of the queens reduces markedly the number of options available to the computer and makes for a more even matchup. Kasparov then embarked upon a bold middle game by lining up matched rooks along the C file and sacrificing one for a knight, which opened up opportunities for a bishop exchange and the capture of more of white's pawns. Materially and positionally, Kasparov was in an advantageous position.

But when Deep Junior responded by moving its remaining bishop to A3 to set up an attack against a central black pawn, Kasparov got spooked and subsequently offered a draw. After some conferencing, Deep Junior's programmers agreed and the match ended right there. After the match, Kasparov told reporters that he simply did not want to lose to the computer.

Following the contest on ESPN2 this afternoon, from what I saw it seemed that Kasparov could have played out the game and fought to a natural draw on his own, or may even have managed the win. His defensive position was good and he had the material advantage. But he let himself get spooked and took the first opportunity to bail out.

It was Man v. Machine, and Kasparov blinked.

Posted: 2003-02-07 09:14pm
by Shinova
Feel the prophecy :shock:

Posted: 2003-02-07 09:17pm
by HemlockGrey
The only downside of the Three Laws of Robotics is that robots will no longer be able to play chess with humans.

Posted: 2003-02-07 10:06pm
by kojikun
Stupid Kasparov could have won too!

Posted: 2003-02-07 10:10pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Wait, you're saying this was on ESPN2?

Must have been hard up for programming.

Posted: 2003-02-07 10:27pm
by Montcalm
When they will make the next model i guess he will use his new tactic quit when he get spooked.

Posted: 2003-02-08 12:22am
by DPDarkPrimus
IBM needs a new chess partner.

Posted: 2003-02-08 02:00pm
by TrailerParkJawa
Why do you find this story so interesting. Im assuming that chess players and computer engineers find the IBM vs Kasporov games to be very interesting each for there own reasons. Im just curious to hear from the people here.

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:08pm
by Patrick Degan
In my case, it's because I'm a chess player. A very casual one these days, who rarely gets an opponnent and keeps up with the game by playing with chess problems printed in the Sunday paper. I just happened to find this game by channel-surfing Friday afternoon. Mainly, it was because Kasparov bailed out on a promising game he still had a good shot at winning outright.

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:11pm
by Joe
Is Kasparov superior to Bobby Fischer?

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:14pm
by Master of Ossus
Durran Korr wrote:Is Kasparov superior to Bobby Fischer?
Probably. He and Karpov have learned from everything that Fischer ever did, and are probably as good natural players as Fischer was. The other obvious advantage that they have is that they play against real players. Fischer never had anyone to practice against because he was an American.

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:18pm
by Joe
Not to mention Kasparov isn't an anti-Semitic prick...

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:21pm
by jaeger115
Not to mention Kasparov isn't an anti-Semitic prick...
And Fischer was? :shock:

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:23pm
by Joe
jaeger115 wrote:
Not to mention Kasparov isn't an anti-Semitic prick...
And Fischer was? :shock:
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/12/chun.htm

Very interesting article.

Posted: 2003-02-08 09:42pm
by IRG CommandoJoe
:shock: Whoa...I never knew that Fischer was like that at all! What a nut!