WEEMADANDO
Posted: 2003-02-10 11:53am
Now, to those reading this, this is not a flaming, simply an honest attempt to set some things straight.
Weemadando, you seem intent on misrepresenting what I've said during certain threads over the past couple days.
To start:
In the AIIF Restructure thread, I flamed Ted for his verbal attacks on both Dalton and Kelly. In your mind, this seems to have made me a Kelly-apologist. Now normaly, an apologist will try to explain away the faults of whatever he's defending. You'll notice I did no such thing, and when I pointed this out to you, you did not respond. You also accused me of being Kelly's lackey. When I called you on it, you again ignored me.
On page 3 of the AIIF thread, Stormbringer made formed the opinion that Sheppard's problem was not with the AIIF itself, but with Alyrium for being gay.
Somehow, you decided to equate me into this, when in fact, I had nothing to do with it. In this thread, you said as much. I pointed out your mistake, but just like before, you did not respond, either because you missed it or chose to ignore it.
Now, I'm not going to defend Stormbringer, because that is his opinion and he is entitled to it (despite the fact that you think him banworthy for it). If he wants to back his opinion up, he may do so. I am simply concrening myself with your tendancy to twist what I say and make my something I'm not, as well as throwing me in with arguments where I did not participate.
Weemadando, you seem intent on misrepresenting what I've said during certain threads over the past couple days.
To start:
In the AIIF Restructure thread, I flamed Ted for his verbal attacks on both Dalton and Kelly. In your mind, this seems to have made me a Kelly-apologist. Now normaly, an apologist will try to explain away the faults of whatever he's defending. You'll notice I did no such thing, and when I pointed this out to you, you did not respond. You also accused me of being Kelly's lackey. When I called you on it, you again ignored me.
On page 3 of the AIIF thread, Stormbringer made formed the opinion that Sheppard's problem was not with the AIIF itself, but with Alyrium for being gay.
Somehow, you decided to equate me into this, when in fact, I had nothing to do with it. In this thread, you said as much. I pointed out your mistake, but just like before, you did not respond, either because you missed it or chose to ignore it.
Now, I'm not going to defend Stormbringer, because that is his opinion and he is entitled to it (despite the fact that you think him banworthy for it). If he wants to back his opinion up, he may do so. I am simply concrening myself with your tendancy to twist what I say and make my something I'm not, as well as throwing me in with arguments where I did not participate.
