Beauty Is In The Eye Of The Android
Posted: 2003-02-11 02:08pm
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=12686
Aww, how sweet!Artificial intelligence experts in Fife have unveiled a robotic head which they say can scientifically determine how attractive women are to men.
But they have warned that it does not work in reverse because masculine appeal to women is not as likely to be based on looks alone.
totallyCaptain tycho wrote:Weird...
Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory.Zaia wrote:And the purpose of this robot is to...do what every hetero guy does automatically anyway? Way to spend heaps of money for no apparent reason at all. Durr.
This is nice and accurate, though:
Aww, how sweet!Artificial intelligence experts in Fife have unveiled a robotic head which they say can scientifically determine how attractive women are to men.
But they have warned that it does not work in reverse because masculine appeal to women is not as likely to be based on looks alone.
Pardon my attitude, but the last thing society needs is yet another way for women to be measured up to be put in their place on the attractiveness scale. Don't you think we get enough of that from the media as it is? Sheesh...
Sorry, I'm just not in the mood to laugh it off as something that's just weird.
LOLAdmiral Valdemar wrote:Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory.
Zaia wrote:LOLAdmiral Valdemar wrote:Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory.
Thanks, babe, I needed a bit of a laugh. *kisses cheek* Good answer.
Hmm, interesting and yet I can see the truth too.Kelly Antilles wrote:Well, most of us are bi- Mike. And there are a lot out there that would never admit to it.
Oh, I agree... Playgirl is one of the most disgusting magazines. No offense to our homosexual contingent. I just think they don't know what a nice looking specimine of a guy looks like. He usually has some clothes on.Admiral Valdemar wrote:[
But yeah, male body is fugly, hence a lot of my female colleagues don't understand porn since us men look at it but women find it pointless (looking at naked men anyway).
That's partially because the male body just isn't as attractive nude as the female body is.Kelly Antilles wrote:Oh, I agree... Playgirl is one of the most disgusting magazines. No offense to our homosexual contingent. I just think they don't know what a nice looking specimine of a guy looks like. He usually has some clothes on.Admiral Valdemar wrote:[
But yeah, male body is fugly, hence a lot of my female colleagues don't understand porn since us men look at it but women find it pointless (looking at naked men anyway).
It says that it won't work in the other way around because most women take into account things other than looks. It can't say that all women do that, because gross generalizations don't work either, but it says that a fembot judging masculine attractiveness won't work because too many chicks have too many other factors to figure into what makes a guy attractive.Kelly Antilles wrote:I must be reading it wrong, but doesn't it say that women base on looks?
Look at Michangelo's David and tell me that. The male body can be a sculpted work of art just as much as a woman's body can be. Mind you I'm not saying that every man or woman is beautiful, but they both can be in there own way.Darth Wong wrote:It's no secret that the female body is a work of art, while the male body is not. Women can't be as obsessed with looks as men, or they would all be lesbians.