Page 1 of 1

Beauty Is In The Eye Of The Android

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:08pm
by Admiral Valdemar

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:12pm
by Captain tycho
Weird... :shock: :shock:

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:20pm
by Zaia
And the purpose of this robot is to...do what every hetero guy does automatically anyway? Way to spend heaps of money for no apparent reason at all. Durr.

This is nice and accurate, though:
Artificial intelligence experts in Fife have unveiled a robotic head which they say can scientifically determine how attractive women are to men.
But they have warned that it does not work in reverse because masculine appeal to women is not as likely to be based on looks alone.
Aww, how sweet! :|

Pardon my attitude, but the last thing society needs is yet another way for women to be measured up to be put in their place on the attractiveness scale. Don't you think we get enough of that from the media as it is? Sheesh...

Sorry, I'm just not in the mood to laugh it off as something that's just weird.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:20pm
by Coaan
Captain tycho wrote:Weird... :shock: :shock:
:shock: totally

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:22pm
by Admiral Valdemar
Zaia wrote:And the purpose of this robot is to...do what every hetero guy does automatically anyway? Way to spend heaps of money for no apparent reason at all. Durr.

This is nice and accurate, though:
Artificial intelligence experts in Fife have unveiled a robotic head which they say can scientifically determine how attractive women are to men.
But they have warned that it does not work in reverse because masculine appeal to women is not as likely to be based on looks alone.
Aww, how sweet! :|

Pardon my attitude, but the last thing society needs is yet another way for women to be measured up to be put in their place on the attractiveness scale. Don't you think we get enough of that from the media as it is? Sheesh...

Sorry, I'm just not in the mood to laugh it off as something that's just weird.
Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory. :)

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:24pm
by Zaia
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory. :)
LOL :D

Thanks, babe, I needed a bit of a laugh. *kisses cheek* Good answer.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:32pm
by Admiral Valdemar
Zaia wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Maybe they will turn against men as women look nicer and you and Kelly and every other female will bask in robot glory. :)
LOL :D

Thanks, babe, I needed a bit of a laugh. *kisses cheek* Good answer.
:oops:

Hehe, yay!

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:33pm
by Kelly Antilles
I must be reading it wrong, but doesn't it say that women base on looks?

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:34pm
by Darth Wong
It's no secret that the female body is a work of art, while the male body is not. Women can't be as obsessed with looks as men, or they would all be lesbians.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:36pm
by Kelly Antilles
Well, most of us are bi- Mike. And there are a lot out there that would never admit to it.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:38pm
by Admiral Valdemar
Kelly Antilles wrote:Well, most of us are bi- Mike. And there are a lot out there that would never admit to it.
Hmm, interesting and yet I can see the truth too.

But yeah, male body is fugly, hence a lot of my female colleagues don't understand porn since us men look at it but women find it pointless (looking at naked men anyway).

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:42pm
by Kelly Antilles
Admiral Valdemar wrote:[
But yeah, male body is fugly, hence a lot of my female colleagues don't understand porn since us men look at it but women find it pointless (looking at naked men anyway).
Oh, I agree... Playgirl is one of the most disgusting magazines. No offense to our homosexual contingent. I just think they don't know what a nice looking specimine of a guy looks like. He usually has some clothes on.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:44pm
by Stormbringer
Kelly Antilles wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:[
But yeah, male body is fugly, hence a lot of my female colleagues don't understand porn since us men look at it but women find it pointless (looking at naked men anyway).
Oh, I agree... Playgirl is one of the most disgusting magazines. No offense to our homosexual contingent. I just think they don't know what a nice looking specimine of a guy looks like. He usually has some clothes on.
That's partially because the male body just isn't as attractive nude as the female body is.

Posted: 2003-02-11 02:59pm
by Zaia
Kelly Antilles wrote:I must be reading it wrong, but doesn't it say that women base on looks?
It says that it won't work in the other way around because most women take into account things other than looks. It can't say that all women do that, because gross generalizations don't work either, but it says that a fembot judging masculine attractiveness won't work because too many chicks have too many other factors to figure into what makes a guy attractive.

I still don't like the idea of it, though. Oh well, they didn't ask me for my input... *shrug*

Posted: 2003-02-11 03:32pm
by Darth Servo
So does this mean that beauty is a measurable quantity after all?

Posted: 2003-02-11 03:40pm
by BlkbrryTheGreat
Darth Wong wrote:It's no secret that the female body is a work of art, while the male body is not. Women can't be as obsessed with looks as men, or they would all be lesbians.
Look at Michangelo's David and tell me that. The male body can be a sculpted work of art just as much as a woman's body can be. Mind you I'm not saying that every man or woman is beautiful, but they both can be in there own way.