ROTFLOLOL! Japanese tell NK that...
Moderator: Edi
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2003-02-09 09:16pm
ROTFLOLOL! Japanese tell NK that...
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/ ... 00992.html
We'll attack, Japan tells North Korea
February 15 2003
By Shane Green
Japan Correspondent
Tokyo
Japan has warned that it is prepared to launch a strike against North Korea if it believes the communist state is preparing a ballistic missile attack on it.
In Tokyo's most robust military stance since the end of World War II, Defence Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Japan would be prepared to strike if it detected North Korea was fuelling ballistic missiles in preparation for an attack.
"It is too late if (a missile) flies towards Japan," Mr Ishiba said. "Our nation will use military force as a self-defence measure if (North Korea) starts to resort to arms against Japan."
Mr Ishiba was at pains to portray a Japanese strike against North Korea as an act of self-defence, in line with Japan's post-war constitution, which forbids military aggression.
But his warning pushes constitutional restraint to the limits, and sends a clear message that Japan will not be a passive target.
As the crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program worsens, Pyongyang has issued increasingly
strident warnings that it is prepared to strike against US forces in the region and their allies. Japan, a chief ally, is within easy missile range.
North Korea maintained its strong line yesterday, rejecting this week's decision by the United Nations nuclear watchdog to refer the nuclear crisis to the UN Security Council.
The North's official Korean Central News Agency dismissed the International Atomic Energy Agency as "America's lapdog", saying Pyongyang had no obligations to the IAEA since its withdrawal from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty last month.
On Wednesday the IAEA declared North Korea in breach of atomic safeguards, sending the crisis to the 15-nation Security Council.
It was not immediately clear exactly what form any Japan strike against North Korea could take. The country has well-equipped forces but is more geared towards self-defence.
Mr Ishiba's warning will further raise tension in the crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program.
The US yesterday reaffirmed that it would not immediately push for UN sanctions following the IAEA decision, instead continuing to pursue a diplomatic solution.
The Japanese defence chief also gave his strong support to the development of a missile defence shield with the US, part of Washington's push for a national missile defence system for US forces and allies in Asia.
Japan is extremely vulnerable to a missile attack. In 1998 North Korea test-fired a missile over Japan that landed in the Pacific. Since then, Tokyo and Washington have been researching a missile defence system.
Mr Ishiba foreshadowed a boosting of Japan's own forces to lessen its reliance on US forces based in the country, saying there was no "free ride" in the post-Cold War era.
The North Korean crisis is also certain to provide impetus to push special emergency legislation through the Diet, Japan's parliament, designed to prepare the country for an attack.
The legislation was bogged down in the Diet last year, but the Government is making a renewed push to have it passed in the current session.
Mr Ishiba's comments came as the the US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, James Kelly, said he believed the North Korean crisis could prompt Japan to rethink its position as a non-nuclear weapons state.
"Certainly, this is a problem that is of a very serious impact on Japan and will cause Japan to rethink all of its positions," he told the House of Representatives International Relations Committee.
But Mr Kelly - the official to whom North Korea confessed to having a nuclear arms program last September - said he believed Japan would stay non-nuclear while it remained under the US nuclear umbrella.
Separately, US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld signalled a possible overhaul of US forces in South Korea, which could include a reduction in the 37,000 troops stationed there.
He told a congressional hearing that he would like to see forces moved away from the heavily fortified border and the South Korean capital, Seoul.
- with agencies
We'll attack, Japan tells North Korea
February 15 2003
By Shane Green
Japan Correspondent
Tokyo
Japan has warned that it is prepared to launch a strike against North Korea if it believes the communist state is preparing a ballistic missile attack on it.
In Tokyo's most robust military stance since the end of World War II, Defence Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Japan would be prepared to strike if it detected North Korea was fuelling ballistic missiles in preparation for an attack.
"It is too late if (a missile) flies towards Japan," Mr Ishiba said. "Our nation will use military force as a self-defence measure if (North Korea) starts to resort to arms against Japan."
Mr Ishiba was at pains to portray a Japanese strike against North Korea as an act of self-defence, in line with Japan's post-war constitution, which forbids military aggression.
But his warning pushes constitutional restraint to the limits, and sends a clear message that Japan will not be a passive target.
As the crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program worsens, Pyongyang has issued increasingly
strident warnings that it is prepared to strike against US forces in the region and their allies. Japan, a chief ally, is within easy missile range.
North Korea maintained its strong line yesterday, rejecting this week's decision by the United Nations nuclear watchdog to refer the nuclear crisis to the UN Security Council.
The North's official Korean Central News Agency dismissed the International Atomic Energy Agency as "America's lapdog", saying Pyongyang had no obligations to the IAEA since its withdrawal from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty last month.
On Wednesday the IAEA declared North Korea in breach of atomic safeguards, sending the crisis to the 15-nation Security Council.
It was not immediately clear exactly what form any Japan strike against North Korea could take. The country has well-equipped forces but is more geared towards self-defence.
Mr Ishiba's warning will further raise tension in the crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program.
The US yesterday reaffirmed that it would not immediately push for UN sanctions following the IAEA decision, instead continuing to pursue a diplomatic solution.
The Japanese defence chief also gave his strong support to the development of a missile defence shield with the US, part of Washington's push for a national missile defence system for US forces and allies in Asia.
Japan is extremely vulnerable to a missile attack. In 1998 North Korea test-fired a missile over Japan that landed in the Pacific. Since then, Tokyo and Washington have been researching a missile defence system.
Mr Ishiba foreshadowed a boosting of Japan's own forces to lessen its reliance on US forces based in the country, saying there was no "free ride" in the post-Cold War era.
The North Korean crisis is also certain to provide impetus to push special emergency legislation through the Diet, Japan's parliament, designed to prepare the country for an attack.
The legislation was bogged down in the Diet last year, but the Government is making a renewed push to have it passed in the current session.
Mr Ishiba's comments came as the the US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, James Kelly, said he believed the North Korean crisis could prompt Japan to rethink its position as a non-nuclear weapons state.
"Certainly, this is a problem that is of a very serious impact on Japan and will cause Japan to rethink all of its positions," he told the House of Representatives International Relations Committee.
But Mr Kelly - the official to whom North Korea confessed to having a nuclear arms program last September - said he believed Japan would stay non-nuclear while it remained under the US nuclear umbrella.
Separately, US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld signalled a possible overhaul of US forces in South Korea, which could include a reduction in the 37,000 troops stationed there.
He told a congressional hearing that he would like to see forces moved away from the heavily fortified border and the South Korean capital, Seoul.
- with agencies
Why is this a funny thing? You would think after being the only nation to have actually suffered a nuclear attack, not once but twice, that it wouldn't want another one.
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2003-02-09 09:16pm
The Japs have said that they could make about 1000~ nukes in a few monthsCrown wrote:Why is this a funny thing? You would think after being the only nation to have actually suffered a nuclear attack, not once but twice, that it wouldn't want another one.
using the plutonium from their nuclear power program.....
And...? They have been using Nuclear power for a very long time you know. Are you saying that they don't have the weapons grade material for it? That they don't have the skilled knowledge to do so? Or that they haven't demonstrated the ability to mass-produce anything?
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
No he's saying that NK will get glassed.Crown wrote:And...? They have been using Nuclear power for a very long time you know. Are you saying that they don't have the weapons grade material for it? That they don't have the skilled knowledge to do so? Or that they haven't demonstrated the ability to mass-produce anything?
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2003-02-09 09:16pm
My apologise, its 3am here and miss-comunication obviously took place.
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
Nice to see that the Japs have finally found their balls again.
You know less than a percent of their GNP goes to the military... yet because Japan is so fabulously wealthy, it's still $40 billion. That's more than the Brits spend ($35 bil or so) and the Brit military budget is at least 2-3% of their GNP.
If Japanese military spending was in line with that of the US (as a % of their GNP) they could build a military that was in the entire world second only to the US.
NK is fucked.
You know less than a percent of their GNP goes to the military... yet because Japan is so fabulously wealthy, it's still $40 billion. That's more than the Brits spend ($35 bil or so) and the Brit military budget is at least 2-3% of their GNP.
If Japanese military spending was in line with that of the US (as a % of their GNP) they could build a military that was in the entire world second only to the US.
NK is fucked.
This is your butt on the street: (_*_)
This is your butt when you get arrested: (_._)
This is your butt in jail: (_O_)
Don't go to jail!
This is your butt when you get arrested: (_._)
This is your butt in jail: (_O_)
Don't go to jail!
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
That would be an interesting attack, since Japan has a marginal PGM capability and that’s mostly anti ship missiles that have secondary ground attack mods. I'm not sure they have any form of SEAD capability at all.
Don't be suprised if a plane load of JDAM kits suddenly deverts to Japan.
Don't be suprised if a plane load of JDAM kits suddenly deverts to Japan.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
- Warlock
- Posts: 10285
- Joined: 2002-07-05 02:28am
- Location: Boston
- Contact:
I thot there were second largest already. lol.
I wonder if we will bring nk to heel in a few months as well.
I wonder if we will bring nk to heel in a few months as well.
This day is Fantastic!
Myers Briggs: ENTJ
Political Compass: -3/-6
DOOMer WoW
"I really hate it when the guy you were pegging as Mr. Worst Case starts saying, "Oh, I was wrong, it's going to be much worse." " - Adrian Laguna
- Uraniun235
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13772
- Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
- Location: OREGON
- Contact:
How is this funny at all? Now not only has NK stated they're willing to preemptively attack US military targets, but Japan just said they're willing to attack if they see NK fueling their missiles... without any knowledge of who's getting hit!
Tensions are going up, and I'd really rather not see any nukes flying around.
Tensions are going up, and I'd really rather not see any nukes flying around.
- ArmorPierce
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 5904
- Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
- Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey
Methinks that you missed the couple of posts afterwards.
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
- The Yosemite Bear
- Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
- Posts: 35211
- Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
- Location: Dave's Not Here Man
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Japan has demonstrated the ability to execute a rapid military buildup before.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
No, they really couldn't. Sinking a bunch of 50's warships is easy enough, but Japans naval land attack capability is limited to gunfire and they might be able to use SSM's and SAM's against shore targets with big distinctive radar signatures like oil tanks.jegs2 wrote:Japan could not attack N. Korea with ground units as the JGSDF currently is dispositioned (and at its relatively small strength), but the Japanese Naval forces could put a hurting on N. Korea with near impunity.
However they'd face a heavy threat from mines, and costal artillery, missiles are a lesser threta becuaseo f there age. Without heavy USAF cover, I'd rather be manning the shore guns though.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Japan would not and could not commit ground forces on its own,. They have something of a gator fleet, but it can only move brigade-sized forces. Their Army, while having good equipment has shit for training. There they have few training areas, and live fire and maneuvers are very restricted and only small scale.
However, while this wont be happening anytime soon, If South Korea was invaded its convincible Japanese forces could be sent. As it is, and as it's likely to be for decades more, a North South war would be over before the Japanese could ship in anything. And the South's reserves can deal with any counter offensive.
IIRC, Japans constitution currently only allows for about 1500 troops with light weapons to be out of the country, and only then on peacekeeping missions.
However, while this wont be happening anytime soon, If South Korea was invaded its convincible Japanese forces could be sent. As it is, and as it's likely to be for decades more, a North South war would be over before the Japanese could ship in anything. And the South's reserves can deal with any counter offensive.
IIRC, Japans constitution currently only allows for about 1500 troops with light weapons to be out of the country, and only then on peacekeeping missions.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: 2002-09-30 06:32pm
No way. SK will not want to see Japanese troops land on the peninsula.kojikun wrote:Red Sun Rising..
I think SK will actually like it if Japan occupies part of the peninsula this time. Not like itll happen tho. LOL
XPViking
If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might if they screamed all the time for no good reason.
I'm not plenty impressed with Japan's modern military, to be honest. Their last venture into fighters, for example, the F-2, turned out to be an underpowered F-16 copy with an unreliable radar, that to boot was ridiculously expensive.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
At that point the North is a nuclear wasteland, there would be no need for Japanese troops. Even a few nukes used tactically would destroy any hope the North would have for a successful offensive. And by successful I mean reach Seoul, they don't have the fuel to even encircle it.kojikun wrote:does that stand even after Seoul has been nukified?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Don't know. But many Koreans don't like the Japanese and are reluctant to have Japanese troops land on the peninsula. In my opinion, if Japanese troops were to land (either by themselves or as part of a UN coalition) then the Koreans would want them to leave first after all is said and done.kojikun wrote:does that stand even after Seoul has been nukified?
XPViking
If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might if they screamed all the time for no good reason.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Yes Japan really should have just bought or produced the F-16 Block50/52.Vympel wrote:I'm not plenty impressed with Japan's modern military, to be honest. Their last venture into fighters, for example, the F-2, turned out to be an underpowered F-16 copy with an unreliable radar, that to boot was ridiculously expensive.
The F-2 not bad that bad for anti shipping though, against the threat warships anyway. And that was its main mission. But I agree, Japan has some good equipment but overall there military is not fit for anything but defensive air and naval actions.
They do have whats likely the worlds best SSK class though, in the form of the Oyashio's. Of course why bother when a mobile minefield when you can just lay hundreds of the fixed kind.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956