Page 1 of 1
Moderators and Admins READ NOW!
Posted: 2002-08-18 02:58am
by RayCav of ASVS
Just testing to see if that avatar is allowed. Yes its porn, but I blocked out the "offensive" parts
Posted: 2002-08-18 03:07am
by Kolinar Romanov
I prferred your Yuri pic....... tch...tch....pornography is da BAD, comrade.
I suggest ya clean up ya act, yes ?
Posted: 2002-08-18 03:16am
by RayCav of ASVS
Hey it's just an experiment. Considering most people's attitudes here and especially Wong's, and considering how I covered the offensive parts anway, I don't really expect too bad of a response. But I don't know, so that's why this is just an experiment. If any of the mods don't like it I'll put my Yuri one back up. I tried to create another account for this specific purpose but I guess SD.net doesn't like multiple accounts on single ISPs. Oh well.
Posted: 2002-08-18 03:37am
by XaLEv
TEH WIN!!1
Posted: 2002-08-18 04:26am
by Cpt_Frank
Nice but remove the stupid block.
Posted: 2002-08-18 10:05am
by Mr Bean
Since the avatar is ment to represent you does this mean your a poor hooker? Or just a porn fanatic I don't know
Personaly I'd go with no even with offense parts blocked off because there are a few Pre 1990s Rush photes floating around that even with the naughtey parts blocked off would make you scream in pain
Posted: 2002-08-18 10:18am
by XaLEv
How about you provide us all with access to a full size, uncensored version?
Posted: 2002-08-18 10:49am
by Pablo Sanchez
I don't think so, but I don't make policy.
Posted: 2002-08-18 11:07am
by Anarchist Bunny
Allowing that would allow me to use the infernal Mr. Bean pic as my avatar. Who wants that? Sorry Ray I just may have killed that for you.
Re: Moderators and Admins READ NOW!
Posted: 2002-08-18 12:09pm
by LordChaos
RayCav of ASVS wrote:Just testing to see if that avatar is allowed. Yes its porn, but I blocked out the "offensive" parts
I, personaly, would say no. However, it's Wong's site.
Posted: 2002-08-18 12:34pm
by AdmiralKanos
To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what to think of it. If it violates any obscenity laws then it's out because I don't want legal trouble. However, I'm not sure if it violates any obscenity laws. Does anyone else know?
Posted: 2002-08-18 12:47pm
by Mr Bean
To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what to think of it. If it violates any obscenity laws then it's out because I don't want legal trouble. However, I'm not sure if it violates any obscenity laws. Does anyone else know
Depends on whos Law you want to use US or Canadian
In the US it is still obsene even if its been edited, If you orgional was it does not matter what editing was done after the fact it still is obsene
Canadian
If it was made in Quebec its Completly legal anywhere else no
(Just kidding no idea about Candian law)
Posted: 2002-08-18 01:18pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Well after reading what seems to be mixed reaction and indecision on Wong's part I've just changed it back.
Posted: 2002-08-18 01:36pm
by Kolinar Romanov
Pity, da comrade, cos' as much as me doenot like porno, me think ye got good idea, yes ?
Posted: 2002-08-18 01:58pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Kolinar Romanov wrote:Pity, da comrade, cos' as much as me doenot like porno, me think ye got good idea, yes ?
heh
anyway, about that girl: her name is Fanny, she may or may not be an actual, um, "star", and she can be found here: masturbation-passion.com/masturbation.htm
She's probably in her early 20's and she lives somewhere in France.
Other than that I do not know, all my attempts to find out more info (READ: stalk) have been thwarted, ironically mostly because of lack of info to start out with. There is one contact that does no (the person that runs the site) but she ain't talking. Don't bother e-mailing her, she never answers e-mail. Typical French whore.
Posted: 2002-08-18 02:16pm
by XaLEv
sweet