StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Michael Medved is just plain fun to listen to, in my opinion. Yesterday, I overheard an NCO talking about how Medved carved up an opponent on his radio show that held the argument that in jist said, "War never solved anything -- we must rely on negotiation."

What follows are some of his comments. Enjoy and discuss:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=29921

VERY good arguments!

He shoots down every anti-war argument I have ever heard.

Great article, anybody PM this to BoredShirtless, and Hammeru

theski wrote:Great article, anybody PM this to BoredShirtless, and Hammeru

<peace creep>Obviously, you're just a tool of the right-wing propaganda machine. Your silly "facts" can't hurt my unfalsifiable hypothesis!</peace creep>

LOFL!!!

In fact here is a secret link to our web site http://www.therightwing.com/conspiracy/

jegs2 wrote:Michael Medved is just plain fun to listen to, in my opinion. Yesterday, I overheard an NCO talking about how Medved carved up an opponent on his radio show that held the argument that in jist said, "War never solved anything -- we must rely on negotiation."

What follows are some of his comments. Enjoy and discuss:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=29921

where can I find more details that saddam likes al queda?

I'd say those are some pretty convincing arguments.

Enforcer Talen wrote:where can I find more details that saddam likes al queda?

Don't think you'll find that anywhere, although it's easy to prove he hates Osama less than he hates the US, and as the saying goes, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Ahhh....smell that? It's the breath of fresh air in the stale old arguments trotted out by peaceniks. Ah...prepare for the fingers in the ears manuever my freinds....

...stale arguments? Smells more like the smoke rising off the broken cogs of the Iraqi war machine...

Ever notice everyone seems to be getting tired of arguing over this issue anymore? The hawks have their threads, the doves have theirs, and never the twain shall meet.

I fall somewhere in the middle (don't much like war; dislike the hippies even more). But I guess I'm a little tired of it.

jegs2 wrote:Michael Medved is just plain fun to listen to, in my opinion. Yesterday, I overheard an NCO talking about how Medved carved up an opponent on his radio show that held the argument that in jist said, "War never solved anything -- we must rely on negotiation."

What follows are some of his comments. Enjoy and discuss:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=29921

Yeah yeah, and for every pro-war personality you can find a anti-war personality all trotting our their opinion like it held any relivance for anyone excepting their own audience. I love it how people preach to the converted and then proclaim themselfs the fount of wisdom on the matter to the acclaim of their own converts.

Interesting arguments, I shall ponder them.

jegs2 wrote:Michael Medved is just plain fun to listen to, in my opinion. Yesterday, I overheard an NCO talking about how Medved carved up an opponent on his radio show that held the argument that in jist said, "War never solved anything -- we must rely on negotiation."

What follows are some of his comments. Enjoy and discuss:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=29921

Michael Medved??? Isn't he the guy who claims to have been the template for Ned Flanders? "We're going to declare war against-iddly Sad-diddly-dam Hus-siddly-sein!"

LOL, CUT DOWN!

Gandalf wrote:LOL, CUT DOWN!

Flanders-ifying regular text is not that hard. Just tack "diddly-doodly" onto anything.

Enforcer Talen wrote:
where can I find more details that saddam likes al queda?

Nowhere, because it's absolute bullshit- in his latest recording Osama called Saddam a socialist heathen who's blood was halal. Oh feel the love.

There has never, ever, been any connection even tentatively shown between Saddam and Al-Quada. Won't stop 60% of Americans from thinking Saddam had something to do with 9/11 tho.

I didn't answer all the ones I've heard, and I've heard some dumbones, but it did go for the most common ones. I think the only really common one I hear that wasn't answered wasn't really anti-war, but used that way:

"Bush is an idiot" Ofcourse there are variants of it, like I heard one guy say in response "Do you think Saddam has WMD?" " I think Bush does" "Well, what about Saddam" "Thats nothing I'm concerned about".

An accual anti-war arguement that wasn't included in this is more likely conspiracy theorist bullshit, and not a valid arguement. That the point of this war is to aid Israeli expansionists so they can opress other Muslims like they do the Palastinians.

Ah, yes, we must invade Iraq for Israel, despite the fact that the IDF is one of the most powerful militaries in the Middle East, if not the most powerful.

The stupidest antiwar argument I've ever heard is 'America has no right to disarm Saddam! If I were the leader of a country and someone just came in and told me I couldn't defend myself, I'd fuck them over too!'

Simon H.Johansen wrote:

Gandalf wrote:LOL, CUT DOWN!

Flanders-ifying regular text is not that hard. Just tack "diddly-doodly" onto anything.

Flanders-ifying?

Gandalf wrote:

Simon H.Johansen wrote:

Gandalf wrote:LOL, CUT DOWN!

Flanders-ifying regular text is not that hard. Just tack "diddly-doodly" onto anything.

Flanders-ifying?

Making a sentence into what Flanders from The Simpsons would say.

As in, instead of "you suck" it would "you su-diddly-uck."

neoolong wrote:

Gandalf wrote:

Simon H.Johansen wrote: Flanders-ifying regular text is not that hard. Just tack "diddly-doodly" onto anything.

Flanders-ifying?

Making a sentence into what Flanders from The Simpsons would say.

As in, instead of "you suck" it would "you su-diddly-uck."

The sentence is something I would say, now I'm confused.

Have you even watched the Simpsons?