US Army acronym question
Posted: 2003-03-08 02:28am
All right, I've seen it used officially both ways now -
Is it "HMMWV" or "HMMMV"?
Is it "HMMWV" or "HMMMV"?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=14578
Humvee sounds cool. As does the Hummer.Vympel wrote:Worst. Jeep. Name. Ever.
They shoulda just called it a jeep.
That would have worked well, except for the decade in which both the orginal and Hummer where in service alongside each other.Vympel wrote:Worst. Jeep. Name. Ever.
They shoulda just called it a jeep.
Easily solved- Jeep II.Sea Skimmer wrote:
That would have worked well, except for the decade in which both the orginal and Hummer where in service alongside each other.
You where saying somthing about bad names?Vympel wrote:Easily solved- Jeep II.Sea Skimmer wrote:
That would have worked well, except for the decade in which both the orginal and Hummer where in service alongside each other.
Officially, it would be Jeep II. Unofficialy, just call it jeep.You where saying somthing about bad names?
A lot of files from the 1950's and 60's are still classified.Vympel wrote:
And besides, the M48 and M60 served alongside each other and their names were Patton, and no one's head exploded.
ROFL. Imagine the GRU offices during THAT one!Sea Skimmer wrote:
A lot of files from the 1950's and 60's are still classified.
Vympel wrote:Civilian Hummers. For people with more money than sense (TM).
Of course, all that matters to the dumbass consumers is size, rather than any capability.Sea Skimmer wrote: The new H2 is just stupid. While the price is down to about 50,000 dollars, in order to make it slightly practical they removed just about all of the of road capability. Little is left but the frame and name of the original.
Nah, I think it is more about the coolness factor, a big ass hummer does look cool and if you can spare the money to buy one why the hell wouldn't you? I mean is there any practical reason for owning a Ferrari (other then getting chicks)?Vympel wrote:Of course, all that matters to the dumbass consumers is size, rather than any capability.Sea Skimmer wrote:The new H2 is just stupid. While the price is down to about 50,000 dollars, in order to make it slightly practical they removed just about all of the of road capability. Little is left but the frame and name of the original.
Nope. But it's coolness is derived from it's appearance and heritage- wheras the Hummer gets it from sheer size and the false 'it's safe' reasoning.Sir Sirius wrote:I mean is there any practical reason for owning a Ferrari (other then getting chicks)?
The Hummer does have that "military feel" to it, about the same end result as the Ferrari's heritage. Never heard of the 'safety factor'.Vympel wrote:Nope. But it's coolness is derived from it's appearance and heritage- wheras the Hummer gets it from sheer size and the false 'it's safe' reasoning.
I think he's referring to the fact that most people associate size with safety in cars. Though unlike your average SUV the Hummer isn't prone to roll over because of its wide wheelbase and low center of gravity. Though I'm sure both where ruined in the H2.Sir Sirius wrote:The Hummer does have that "military feel" to it, about the same end result as the Ferrari's heritage. Never heard of the 'safety factor'.Vympel wrote:Nope. But it's coolness is derived from it's appearance and heritage- wheras the Hummer gets it from sheer size and the false 'it's safe' reasoning.