Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=15007
Seriously. I almost feel sorry for Gephardt and Daschle (but not really), I can only imagine what they're thinking when they a member of their party doing something like this.Sokar wrote:Bunch of horse shit...all this would do is cost the Democrats seats during the next election.
Remember how the impeachment of Clinton turned into a farce? This would be a bigger farce. Even presidents doing things somewhat unpopular with a segment of the populace can usually make their detractors look real bad when they're jumped on. The office of the President has a certain aura which demands a standard of sorts for impeachment which is a bit higher than, well, dislike. How exactly could the support be mustered, anyway?Frank_Scenario wrote:Legislation is being drafted to impeach Bush.
Edited to add brief thoughts on the matter: It would be great if it happened, but that's a long shot.
The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Remember how the impeachment of Clinton turned into a farce? This would be a bigger farce. Even presidents doing things somewhat unpopular with a segment of the populace can usually make their detractors look real bad when they're jumped on. The office of the President has a certain aura which demands a standard of sorts for impeachment which is a bit higher than, well, dislike. How exactly could the support be mustered, anyway?Frank_Scenario wrote:Legislation is being drafted to impeach Bush.
Edited to add brief thoughts on the matter: It would be great if it happened, but that's a long shot.
No. If a Democrat lies, it's called a delayed campaign promise.Durran Korr wrote:Perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury. Even if you're a Democrat.
I know it won't happen, and if Bush is impeached, he won't be kicked out of office, and if he is kicked out, Cheney (who is no better in my estimation) will just step in. But a man can dream, can't he?The Duchess of Zeon wrote: Remember how the impeachment of Clinton turned into a farce? This would be a bigger farce. Even presidents doing things somewhat unpopular with a segment of the populace can usually make their detractors look real bad when they're jumped on. The office of the President has a certain aura which demands a standard of sorts for impeachment which is a bit higher than, well, dislike. How exactly could the support be mustered, anyway?
Oh yeah, because we all know the fact that he perjured and obstructed justice had nothing to do with it.Enlightenment wrote:<LOL!>
Long overdue payback for the Republicans impeaching Clinton for the crime of being a Democrat.
*cough* and raped Juanita Broderick *cough*Stormbringer wrote:Oh yeah, because we all know the fact that he perjured and obstructed justice had nothing to do with it.Enlightenment wrote:<LOL!>
Long overdue payback for the Republicans impeaching Clinton for the crime of being a Democrat.
I don't know and I'd hesitate to condemn him on something like that without a trial. Clinton was a sleazy guy and one debauched, adulterous, perv but I'd hesitate to call him a rapist on any one person's charge with out a trial.Col. Crackpot wrote:*cough* and raped Juanita Broderick *cough*Stormbringer wrote:Oh yeah, because we all know the fact that he perjured and obstructed justice had nothing to do with it.
that's true. but there was one thing i always found fishy. It had always been the policy of NOW to force an investigation on behalf of any woman who cried rape. Where were they then? Was their legislative agenda more important than their core values? i guess so.Stormbringer wrote:I don't know and I'd hesitate to condemn him on something like that without a trial. Clinton was a sleazy guy and one debauched, adulterous, perv but I'd hesitate to call him a rapist on any one person's charge with out a trial.Col. Crackpot wrote:*cough* and raped Juanita Broderick *cough*Stormbringer wrote:Oh yeah, because we all know the fact that he perjured and obstructed justice had nothing to do with it.
LOL!! So true...jegs2 wrote:No. If a Democrat lies, it's called a delayed campaign promise.Durran Korr wrote:Perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury. Even if you're a Democrat.
Part of it was Clinton was a smarmy bastard that managed to lie his way out of a jam time and time again. Since they couldn't win they didn't want to get lumped in with the conservatives.Col. Crackpot wrote:that's true. but there was one thing i always found fishy. It had always been the policy of NOW to force an investigation on behalf of any woman who cried rape. Where were they then? Was their legislative agenda more important than their core values? i guess so.Stormbringer wrote:I don't know and I'd hesitate to condemn him on something like that without a trial. Clinton was a sleazy guy and one debauched, adulterous, perv but I'd hesitate to call him a rapist on any one person's charge with out a trial.Col. Crackpot wrote:*cough* and raped Juanita Broderick *cough*
Don't these fucktards realize that to impeach the President, you have to have evidence that he's broken a law?House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers (D-Mich.) assembled more than two-dozen prominent liberal attorneys and legal scholars on Tuesday to mull over articles of impeachment drafted against President Bush by activists seeking to block military action against Saddam Hussein.
I'd imagine they're going to try and challenge him on the War Powers Act or something along those lines. It'll never work but that isn't likely to deter them.IG-88E wrote:Don't these fucktards realize that to impeach the President, you have to have evidence that he's broken a law?House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers (D-Mich.) assembled more than two-dozen prominent liberal attorneys and legal scholars on Tuesday to mull over articles of impeachment drafted against President Bush by activists seeking to block military action against Saddam Hussein.
Impeach (def): To accuse a public official of misconduct.
Wow, Bush has been acting pretty lawlessly, huh?
Maybe that's because Juanita is a known liar, even among her own familyStormbringer wrote:Col. Crackpot wrote:that's true. but there was one thing i always found fishy. It had always been the policy of NOW to force an investigation on behalf of any woman who cried rape. Where were they then? Was their legislative agenda more important than their core values? i guess so.Stormbringer wrote: I don't know and I'd hesitate to condemn him on something like that without a trial. Clinton was a sleazy guy and one debauched, adulterous, perv but I'd hesitate to call him a rapist on any one person's charge with out a trial.You have it completely backwards. If Clinton did half the stuff Bush has done, he would've been impeached a thousand times over. Every bogus story on Clinton was treated as fact by the media. No one got on Newt Gingrich for his madness. No one cared that the bastard left his wife for another woman even when she was on her deathbed.Part of it was, indeed the fact that Clinton was a liberal. Any conservative that did half of what he did affair and affair-cover up-wise have been raked over the coals until he resigned. But since NOW and other are in bed with the Democrats they chose to shut up.
I don't recall the press spying on republican dick.
This ridiculous crap didn't stop with Clinton. The media has had quite the anti-democrat bias. Case in point : Gary Condit. Condit, despite the lack of evidence tying him with Chandra Levy's dissapearance, was considered guilty by the press.
However, this same media never covered the dead intern found in republican congressman Joe Scarborough's office.
And btw, Clinton's policies reflected those of a moderate republican.
I find it more than fishy that there wasn't something substantial for an investigation. Any serious charge of rape should damn well be investigated, President or not.
LMAO!jegs2 wrote:No. If a Democrat lies, it's called a delayed campaign promise.Durran Korr wrote:Perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury is perjury. Even if you're a Democrat.