StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Spoilers for WILLARD:
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..

Willard, a social misfit, is constantly humiliated and
squeezed out of the family business by his boss. His
only friends consist of a new temp in the office and a
couple of rats he raises at home. But when one of the
rats is killed at work, Willard unleashes his rage and
his army of rats on his tormentors.

*********

Now, who does this remind me of?

Hmmmm....you don't say...?

My friends called me Willard when I had a pet rat...

But when one of the rats is killed at work,

How does this happen? Does the rat crash his fork-lift into a load of pallets or something?

Willard unleashes his rage and his army of rats on his tormentors.

But he only had a couple of rats a second ago!
What a promising film. Let me guess:

Victim killed by rat swarm on couch while engrossed on TV
Victim killed by rat swarm on toilet
Victim killed by rat swarm while in bed, so camera can show rats disappearing under the bedclothes and thus remain unseen to the viewer as they cause havoc
Victim killed by rats while on a loft-ladder - rats savage face while the victim's legs kick hysterically

jmac wrote:Hmmmm....you don't say...?

You like rats?

I've got 9 of 'em.

One of them had to have a hysterectomy though. Mumified fetus.

Ted wrote:... Mumified fetus.

Someday Wong should make that someone's custom title.

Oops wrong thread.

How is this a new movie? Willard came out in 1971. Oh wait you mean the Crispin Glover remake. Seriously, not a new idea though.

neoolong wrote:I would say Joe Millionare. It is the only one that is based on a lie. The rest are at least honest about what they are.

*points and laughs at Neoolong, he posted in the wrong thread!!!*

I think somebody posted to the wrong thread.

Or perhaps it's a clever way to boost post count.

neoolong wrote:Or perhaps it's a clever way to boost post count.

No, this is.

Mark S wrote:

Ted wrote:... Mumified fetus.

Someday Wong should make that someone's custom title.

Am I the only one who thinks that is piss-in-your-pants funny? Bwahahaha!

IG-88E wrote:

neoolong wrote:Or perhaps it's a clever way to boost post count.

No, this is.

I'm going to have to say that's the funniest thing I've heard today (that'd be as in Friday, as I'm still up for the evening, you Eight-Fingered Smartasses out there ).

Perhaps it really does relate to the thread, and we have to simply analyze it enough to find the hidden meaning...

IG-88E wrote:

neoolong wrote:Or perhaps it's a clever way to boost post count.

No, this is.

It's not that clever if you're obvious about it .

The Dark wrote:It's not that clever if you're obvious about it .

But thats just it, its so blantantly obvious, its clever. Instead of saying something clever like anyone else, we've got this. And I am in awe.

But enough incoherent rambling, good night all.

Frank Hipper wrote:

Mark S wrote:

Ted wrote:... Mumified fetus.

Someday Wong should make that someone's custom title.

Am I the only one who thinks that is piss-in-your-pants funny? Bwahahaha!

I thought it was funny.

Darth Pounder wrote:http://www.ianai.net/jokes/forumpix/spamsign.jpg

SP at M? What does that mean?

I do think it is kind of dumb when people use symbols in the place of letters.


How's that for a pointless reply?

Spam detected. Acquiring target...

Does that mean hes gonna lock it?

Will I beat it if he does?

EDIT: Hooray!

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

*sighs* I was gonna give it a chance to get back on what little topic there was, but it was not to be.