StarDestroyer.Net BBS

I'm "AndyHan".

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthrea ... 821&page=2



Basically, "forum.bodybuilding.com" isn't the best place to go to if you want to converse with intelligent people, but it's nonetheless hilarious.

For those who don't know, "forum.bodybuilding.com" is a notorious board populated with openly racist, misogynist, homophobic steroid abusers who run around throwing bizarre mispronunciations of the English language and beating their chests in alphagasms (this despite recent polls showing the vast majority are virgins).

Didn't they invade this board years ago?

Literally all my brain can glean from most of the other posts is "DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR". It's great how your simple requests for evidence of any kind is met entirely with "Lol troll".

" I post a contention, and you ask for statistics. That's not moving the discussion forward."

madd0ct0r wrote:Didn't they invade this board years ago?

Before my time, but I think that was elitefitness.

Luke Skywalker wrote:

madd0ct0r wrote:Didn't they invade this board years ago?

Before my time, but I think that was elitefitness.

This is a totally different hive (not to mention generation, at this point) of knuckle dragging nerf-herders

How many female presidents have we had?

How many indian presidents have we had?

The U.S.A MUST BE RACIST AGAINST INDIANS

wow.... I think someone doesn't understand the argument he's trying to take part in.

The funniest thing about this is that I clicked on the link and got a Malware warning from Chrome.

My personal viewpoint is. Don't bother. It's just not worth the heartache.

My own personal story involved the woman charter here in Singapore. There's a lot of men who feel it gives women too much privileges,ignoring the history of discrimination and disempowerment women had in Singapore. It's just mind boggling how people fear the threat of rape accusations for marital rape,ignoring certain celebrity cases that show the need for such protection.

It's just a totally different perspective. Even when we aligned on actions, we disagree on the reasons why.(I felt that the woman charter focus on male as the sole source of alimony is a construct of the patriarchy and ignores the social milieu of Singapore, this while knowing full well that only a minute percentage of men are wronged by this, compared I the numerous women who need aid and support.... They simply argued it was unfair.

Were they seriously discussing women's suffrage? Holy fuck.

Spekio wrote:Were they seriously discussing women's suffrage? Holy fuck.

Guess there's probably some Rush Limbaugh listeners in there then. Saw this yesterday, terrifying to think this man is popular.