this does beg the question of how dealers and retailers add value. Clearly, there is a cost as the dealer has to make more than enough money to cover the costs of operating the dealership. Why do not all manufacturers simply sell direct to the end consumer?William A. Levinson wrote:• It cuts out the salesman’s commission and salary. The only sales cost is the cost of processing the order.
• It cuts out the expensive showroom (a fixed asset). The service station can warehouse one of each model for test drives. Compare this to a parking lot-full of inventory.
• It avoids ending the model year with inventories of cars with colors and options no one wanted. Every car that leaves the factory has a buyer.
• Customers get exactly what they want, not what the dealer wants to push off his lot.
The truth is, however, that Henry Ford introduced this concept more than 100 years ago. The Ford Motor Co. sold directly to the public during its early days, and in My Life and Work (Doubleday, Page & Co., 1922), Ford points out the problems with inventory:
“We make cars to sell, not to store, and a month’s unsold production would turn into a sum the interest on which alone would be enormous.... We can no more afford to carry large stocks of finished [goods] than we can of raw material. Everything has to move in and move out.”
Here are a few ideas of how dealers and retailers sometimes add value.
• A dealer is better able to market to build a relationship with a niche of customers.
• (For physical retailers) the customer can obtain possession of the good immediately upon purchase. (It is impractical for most manufacturers to have factories even across a continent, let alone the whole world,. just they that they can have same-day direct sales.)
• Dealers and retailers can offer products from multiple manufacturers, thus being a one-stop to browse and compare, rather than customers having to contact every manufacturer.