Page 1 of 1
Furry erotic art lacks biological consistency
Posted: 2003-04-05 04:14am
by Spyder
Anyone ever notice that anthropomorphic non mammals seem to have mammary glands?
I mean, shit, how the hell do people get off on something that's not supposed to have tits anyway?
Posted: 2003-04-05 04:32am
by Brother-Captain Gaius
I believe there is only one proper response to this:
...
Posted: 2003-04-05 04:39am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I think he's testing us.
Posted: 2003-04-05 04:44am
by XaLEv
No, I can't say that I have.
But then, I can't say that I've seen any non-mammalian furry porn at all.
Posted: 2003-04-05 05:04am
by Spanky The Dolphin
He's trying to see how we react to stuff like this. So just ignore it.
Posted: 2003-04-05 05:30am
by Spyder
Actually, I was having a look at today's
sluggy and the name of the sucubus reminded me of a few
Something Awful ALoD's, and mammory glands. It seemed like an interesting idea for a thread, might get a *snicker* or two. At worst a "..."
Posted: 2003-04-05 08:58am
by Vympel
Riiigggghhhht. Thread locked. Nah- Hall of Shame.
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:00am
by Stormbringer
It's stranger than hell but it doesn't deserve the Hall of Shame.
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:04am
by Sea Skimmer
Another fine use of bandwidth by the stardestroyer.net forums....
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:16am
by RedImperator
Of all the problems with furry erotic art you could have come up with, you picked, "Why do snake-women have boobs?", or whatever the hell else they draw that's "non-mammalian furry"?
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:20am
by Cpt_Frank
.......
*sigh*
the board's decaying.
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:22am
by Xenophobe3691
What the hell...
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:35am
by Vympel
Stormbringer wrote:It's stranger than hell but it doesn't deserve the Hall of Shame.
What do you think now, mate ?
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:35am
by Stormbringer
Just nuke it.
Posted: 2003-04-05 10:50am
by Vympel
SS-25 SICKLE fired, and thread locked.