Which would you choose?
- Sex, rock 'n roll, and welfare-level poverty
- Lawyers, guns, money, ... and no sex ever again
Moderator: Edi
Neither extremist society is going to involve gender based discrimination for the purposes of this question?Darth Wong wrote:OK, the "sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll" vs "lawyers, guns, and money" thread is totally one-sided and far too easy. Let's up the ante:
Which would you choose?
- Sex, rock 'n roll, and welfare-level poverty
- Lawyers, guns, money, ... and no sex ever again
I'm sure such a totally business oriented society would have cloning or something like that. In fact, that would probably explain why there was no sex.Dalton wrote:Sex, rock 'n roll, and welfare-level poverty, of course. Since it actually allows for the propagation of the human race.
Hmmmm....Crayz9000 wrote:I just can't fucking stand clean, sterile environments.
Sex? Fun? Yay.Darth Wong wrote:OK, the "sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll" vs "lawyers, guns, and money" thread is totally one-sided and far too easy. Let's up the ante:
Which would you choose?
- Sex, rock 'n roll, and welfare-level poverty
- Lawyers, guns, money, ... and no sex ever again
Phobia of sex? I am curious, but I also find it very disturbing.Pu-239 wrote:Lawyers, Guns, and money- my personality is so shitty I won't be able to get sex anyways, and I have a phobia of sex- due to reasons I will not mention.
Depends. Keith Richards has lived into his sixties, I believe (ignore the fact he's officially the ugliest man on the face of the Earth). Jimi Hendrix didn't didn't take nearly so many drugs as Keith and he died young.Zoink wrote:With the "drugs" part, what is my expected life-span for option #1?