Page 1 of 1

UN to set standards on use of the term 'elite'

Posted: 2003-04-08 09:28am
by Companion Cube

Posted: 2003-04-08 10:18am
by Vympel
I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a joke. The Republican Guards certainly aren't elite. They never were, by any objective standard.

Posted: 2003-04-08 10:22am
by neoolong
Now they just need to settle on what the exact standards are for the label, 1337.

Posted: 2003-04-08 03:34pm
by paladin
That article has to be a joke. But given how stupid politics can make some people, it could be true.

Reading more articles on that site, I sure its a joke.

Posted: 2003-04-08 03:38pm
by Dalton
BBSpot is a joke news site.

Posted: 2003-04-08 03:40pm
by Sea Skimmer
Vympel wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a joke. The Republican Guards certainly aren't elite. They never were, by any objective standard.

Well, it in part depends on your benchmark. At least some parts of the Republican guard might be considered elite, compared to the rest of Iraq's army. But if we use western troops as the standard there competent as best.

Posted: 2003-04-08 03:44pm
by neoolong
"Elite garbageman Kevin Jacobsen takes out the trash."

C'mon that just rocks.

Posted: 2003-04-08 09:39pm
by Exonerate
Heh, Iraqi Republican Guard should be referred to Pretty Good or Possibly elite... :lol:

Posted: 2003-04-08 09:43pm
by Master of Ossus
Vympel wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a joke. The Republican Guards certainly aren't elite. They never were, by any objective standard.
By my definition of the term "elite," the Republican Guard is an elite unit. I would term any unit into which top members of other units are permitted, but poor members of other units are excluded, as being elite.

The Republican Guard is also given additional training and equipment, when compared with the standard Iraqi military forces.