Funny 'toy'..
Posted: 2002-08-30 08:18am
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1756
*cough*When my 12 year old daughter asked for this for her birthday, I kind of wondered if she was too old for it, but she seems to LOVE it. Her friends love it too! They play for hours in her bedroom with this great toy. They really seem to like the special effects it offers (the sound effects and vibrating). My oldest daughter (17) really likes it too! I reccomend this for all children.
Okaaay..My 12 year old daughter is a big Harry Potter fan, and loved the part with the Nimbus 2000, so I decided to buy her this toy. I was afraid she would think it was too babyish, but she LOVES this toy. Even my daughter's friends enjoy playing with this fun toy. I was surprised at how long they can just sit in her room and play with this magic broomstick! A great buy for any Harry Potter fan!
This toy was #1 on my daughter's Christmas list. So what the heck, although it has no educational value I figured it would be good for imaginative play. It wasn't until after she opened her gift and started playing with it that I realized that the toy may offer a more than sensational experience. The broomstick has cute sound effects and ***VIBRATES*** when they put it between their legs to fly. Come on---what were the creators of this toy thinking? She'll keep playing with the Nimbus 2000, but with the batteries removed.
I wonder why.......?My oldest daughter (17) really likes it too!
Wow, thats pretty sad. Didn't notice the vibrating feature at first.Cpt_Frank wrote: That's..... disturbing.
This guy must be very.... naive.
17 year old daughter.
vibrating phallic object.
Holy mother of fuck.
That's so.... unreal. Like some kind of sick joke from a bad comedy.
Heh heh ... a 17 year old is above the age of consent. It's not pedophilia. Besides, that brooom is going to be a lot more effective than her fingers; it's not as if she can't masturbate without assistance.Captain Lennox wrote:Well, all I can say is Ewwwwwwww Sick bastards, giving vibrators to kids and about the 17 yeard year old, which that's pretty frigging obvious.*Think these reviews came from a Pedofile Site* Thats just wrong*shakes head*
When my 12 year old daughter asked for this for her birthday, I kind of wondered if she was too old for it, but she seems to LOVE it. Her friends love it too! They play for hours in her bedroom with this great toy. They really seem to like the special effects it offers (the sound effects and vibrating). My oldest daughter (17) really likes it too! I reccomend this for all children.
*Nodnod* Yes, the fundamental right is a right we should all practice , but I didn't want to know about their broom fantasies:lol:Darth Wong wrote:Heh heh ... a 17 year old is above the age of consent. It's not pedophilia. Besides, that brooom is going to be a lot more effective than her fingers; it's not as if she can't masturbate without assistance.Captain Lennox wrote:Well, all I can say is Ewwwwwwww Sick bastards, giving vibrators to kids and about the 17 yeard year old, which that's pretty frigging obvious.*Think these reviews came from a Pedofile Site* Thats just wrong*shakes head*
As for the 12 year old, well, it's still not pedophilia if she's just doing it to herself and no adults are participating or watching.
The freedom to play with yourself is a fundamental human right
Public school.Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:What ever happened to imagination?
You talkin about christianity?What ever happened to imagination?