The Conspiracy Thread
Posted: 2003-04-27 02:21am
Are there any particular conspiacy theories or ideas that you find particularly interesting or possibly true?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=18791
[nodnod] Ditto, here.. just make sure you don't ever live there, btw. It's HELL ~ and only HALF because it's a tourist trap.. -__-;;Frank Hipper wrote:There is one, and ONLY one, thing about Roswell that makes me wonder.
How is it that the intelligence officer of the most important bomber wing of the USAF think that a radar target balloon was a flying saucer?
Where are you getting this information from?Frank Hipper wrote:There is one, and ONLY one, thing about Roswell that makes me wonder.
How is it that the intelligence officer of the most important bomber wing of the USAF think that a radar target balloon was a flying saucer?
Newspapers. From the 1940s.Durran Korr wrote:Where are you getting this information from?Frank Hipper wrote:There is one, and ONLY one, thing about Roswell that makes me wonder.
How is it that the intelligence officer of the most important bomber wing of the USAF think that a radar target balloon was a flying saucer?
I had this incredibly kickass book called Encyclopedia of the Strange that had a transcript of Jesse Marcell's(sp?)original press release stating that he claimed that a "flying saucer" had crashed outside of Roswell, NM. The latest government information states that there was indeed some cover-upish stuff done at the time do to the fact that what in fact was recovered was a radar target balloon, which was very much top-secret at the time.verilon wrote:Newspapers. From the 1940s.Durran Korr wrote:Where are you getting this information from?Frank Hipper wrote:There is one, and ONLY one, thing about Roswell that makes me wonder.
How is it that the intelligence officer of the most important bomber wing of the USAF think that a radar target balloon was a flying saucer?
Not to sound bragging but I think I started that.JediNeophyte wrote:Well, seeing as how a bit of Dr. Strangelove has creeped into everyone's sigs lately (ex: see above), an International Communist Conspiracy!
Ever since you turned 21 you seem to curse a lot more.weemadando wrote:All of them!
Bwhahaahhahaha!
All of them you hear me! Everything you fucking know is WRONG MOTHER FUCKER!
*stops playing Deus Ex and goes sits in the corner*
errrr.... not that I've noticed.Gandalf wrote:Ever since you turned 21 you seem to curse a lot more.weemadando wrote:All of them!
Bwhahaahhahaha!
All of them you hear me! Everything you fucking know is WRONG MOTHER FUCKER!
*stops playing Deus Ex and goes sits in the corner*
I guess it seems more blatant now. Then again I may have just missed it.weemadando wrote:errrr.... not that I've noticed.Gandalf wrote:Ever since you turned 21 you seem to curse a lot more.weemadando wrote:All of them!
Bwhahaahhahaha!
All of them you hear me! Everything you fucking know is WRONG MOTHER FUCKER!
*stops playing Deus Ex and goes sits in the corner*
I always swear. A LOT.
Well, that's not exactly a conspiracy theory, since for the official line to be true we have to throw out the laws of physics.The Yosemite Bear wrote:I do not believe that it was a "Lone gunman acting alone that killed kennedy.
You want to know who killed Kennedy,watch Babylon 5 that will give you an idea.Durran Korr wrote:Well, that's not exactly a conspiracy theory, since for the official line to be true we have to throw out the laws of physics.The Yosemite Bear wrote:I do not believe that it was a "Lone gunman acting alone that killed kennedy.
So Kennedy was killed by... the Psi-Corps????Montcalm wrote:You want to know who killed Kennedy,watch Babylon 5 that will give you an idea.Durran Korr wrote:Well, that's not exactly a conspiracy theory, since for the official line to be true we have to throw out the laws of physics.The Yosemite Bear wrote:I do not believe that it was a "Lone gunman acting alone that killed kennedy.
In 1943 and then again in 1950 USN fleets expended thousands of rounds of ammunition on what turned out to be radar ghosts. The third engagement in the Tonking gulf in 1964 is also now thought to have been against radar ghosts, low clouds made star shell useless.Frank Hipper wrote:There is one, and ONLY one, thing about Roswell that makes me wonder.
How is it that the intelligence officer of the most important bomber wing of the USAF think that a radar target balloon was a flying saucer?