cheating
Posted: 2003-05-08 06:42am
if you thot you could get away with cheating on a paper, would you?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=19720
one is tests and one is people.Vympel wrote:Whats the difference between this thread and the part 2 thread?
Heh, UGA kicked out a girl from programming Chemistry information onto her TI-83 calculator for a test, no questions asked. They're pretty serious about it, too.RedImperator wrote:No, no, absolutely fucking not. What the hell kind of would-be academic passes off somone else's work as his own? I don't cheat and I fully support policies (such as Villanova's) that prescribe automatic failure of a class for cheating and expulsion for plagarism.
In my book that's not cheating, that's being prepared. In the real world, you're not going to have to do academic shit without having a bunch of references in front of you. Why should I have to know my shit better in school than I will in the work force?Durran Korr wrote:Heh, UGA kicked out a girl from programming Chemistry information onto her TI-83 calculator for a test, no questions asked. They're pretty serious about it, too.RedImperator wrote:No, no, absolutely fucking not. What the hell kind of would-be academic passes off somone else's work as his own? I don't cheat and I fully support policies (such as Villanova's) that prescribe automatic failure of a class for cheating and expulsion for plagarism.
They have to be. If a university gets a reputation for tolerating cheating, the value of its degrees drops for everybody. I'd be mad as hell if I found out my $80,000 BA was worth less than it should be because my college had a reputation for cheating. This is why I'm all for throwing them out and keeping them out--not to mention the resentment that comes when I work my ass off to write a paper and some shithead buys his off a website the night before it's due and gets a good grade on it.Durran Korr wrote:Heh, UGA kicked out a girl from programming Chemistry information onto her TI-83 calculator for a test, no questions asked. They're pretty serious about it, too.RedImperator wrote:No, no, absolutely fucking not. What the hell kind of would-be academic passes off somone else's work as his own? I don't cheat and I fully support policies (such as Villanova's) that prescribe automatic failure of a class for cheating and expulsion for plagarism.
Because the test was SPECIFICALLY testing her knowledge of the formulas she had put in the calculator. By that logic, if I take a history exam and keep a little notecard with all the important names and dates on it, that's not cheating either because after college, I could look those up in an almanac.Iceberg wrote:In my book that's not cheating, that's being prepared. In the real world, you're not going to have to do academic shit without having a bunch of references in front of you. Why should I have to know my shit better in school than I will in the work force?
Which is just another way of saying "rote memorization." History doesn't rely on rote memorization; it relies on analyzing and interpreting what happened. If a professor can't create a test that forces students to think even though they have the formulae right in front of them, then he's just not a very good professor.RedImperator wrote:Because the test was SPECIFICALLY testing her knowledge of the formulas she had put in the calculator. By that logic, if I take a history exam and keep a little notecard with all the important names and dates on it, that's not cheating either because after college, I could look those up in an almanac.Iceberg wrote:In my book that's not cheating, that's being prepared. In the real world, you're not going to have to do academic shit without having a bunch of references in front of you. Why should I have to know my shit better in school than I will in the work force?
Um...yes?Zaia wrote:I'm a teacher. What do you think?