StarDestroyer.Net BBS

What is in Marsellus' breifcase in Pulp Fiction?
I've heard some really wierd suggestions so now I'm wondering what you think.
I think it is gold, but what do you think?

Only delicious Hostess Twinkies emit such a beautiful golden hue!

I've never seen the movie, but I heard somebody say he thought it was that one guy's soul.

If you want to be mundane, the prop contained a lightbulb.

or a bunch of pixeled after effects.

Baby Ramoth.

I think it was gold. I used to think it was drugs, but I've since changed my mind.

It's the same thing as in the briefcase in Ronin.

mmm, Irish Chicks

Dooey Jo wrote:What is in Marsellus' breifcase in Pulp Fiction?
I've heard some really wierd suggestions so now I'm wondering what you think.
I think it is gold, but what do you think?

"A lightbulb." -Quentin Tarantino

Dooey Jo wrote:What is in Marsellus' breifcase in Pulp Fiction?
I've heard some really wierd suggestions so now I'm wondering what you think.
I think it is gold, but what do you think?

You know I should really slap you for just bringing this up. This is the Outrageous Okona arguement of movies.

Why on earth does Galvatron have a custom rank? Is he another incarnation of DW again? A friend of DW? His wife?

I think Wong bestowed it upon him as a reward for choosing that particular name.

weemadando wrote: You know I should really slap you for just bringing this up. This is the Outrageous Okona arguement of movies.

Yes, you should slap me... But you can't, now can you? Mohahaha!!
I'm to far away for you!! Haahaa

BTW, what's an "Outrageous Okona argument of movies"? Does this question make me undereducated?

Don't push your luck, I will be in Europe for a significant amount of time over the next two years, so I'll be sure to come and hunt you down and bitchslap you. And then take all your women and go to Austria for a party.

*edit* The Outrageous Okona is an episode of TNG that every new Trekkie brings up as incontrivertable proof that ST would defeat SW. And everyone is sick of rebutting it. Hell, the next time one comes through they might just live.

So make a sticky for newbs to read that says "If Outrageous Okona arguments are made, read this first!" in regards to this argument...or something to that effect where there is a simple permanent post that everyone sees and will read so that noone else has to hear it. Make sense? You get the jist of it though.

weemadando wrote:Don't push your luck, I will be in Europe for a significant amount of time over the next two years, so I'll be sure to come and hunt you down and bitchslap you. And then take all your women and go to Austria for a party.

Oh no!! Please don't slap me!! Noo!! Not in the face!!

*edit* The Outrageous Okona is an episode of TNG that every new Trekkie brings up as incontrivertable proof that ST would defeat SW. And everyone is sick of rebutting it. Hell, the next time one comes through they might just live.

But what has that to with Marsellus' briefcase?

verilon wrote:So make a sticky for newbs to read that says "If Outrageous Okona arguments are made, read this first!" in regards to this argument...or something to that effect where there is a simple permanent post that everyone sees and will read so that noone else has to hear it. Make sense? You get the jist of it though.

You can't do that in usenet. And most every new Trekkie thinks that they have the new ultimate arguement. Though I do propse we do this in SD.net

Draw it up and I will make it sticky in SW vs ST