Hmm Am I evil for proposing this?
Posted: 2003-07-29 09:31am
Well, you see, Hipper and me last night were talking about
radio controlled warship combat:
Linky Here
and Here too
Hipper said that he couldn't do that, as they sink.
I said they look cheap because they're BB guns and they
can fire 4 pellets/second.
Anyway, Hipper and I started talking about realistic naval combat,
especially after I figured that in 1:72 scale, 406mm (16-inch) is
equal to 5.6mm, roughly about the size of a 5.56mm NATO round,
and that 40,000+ yards (about 23 miles) at 1:72 scale came out to
555 yards or just a quarter of a mile.
So it's theoretically possible to ballistically match a 5.56mm round
to a 16-inch shell at 1:72 scale.
And have your own mock naval gun duels between 1:72 ship targets
and a scale USS Iowa Gun turret....
Oh yeah, and this guy's model kicks ass
Behold the Graf Spee
radio controlled warship combat:
Linky Here
and Here too
Hipper said that he couldn't do that, as they sink.
I said they look cheap because they're BB guns and they
can fire 4 pellets/second.
Anyway, Hipper and I started talking about realistic naval combat,
especially after I figured that in 1:72 scale, 406mm (16-inch) is
equal to 5.6mm, roughly about the size of a 5.56mm NATO round,
and that 40,000+ yards (about 23 miles) at 1:72 scale came out to
555 yards or just a quarter of a mile.
So it's theoretically possible to ballistically match a 5.56mm round
to a 16-inch shell at 1:72 scale.
And have your own mock naval gun duels between 1:72 ship targets
and a scale USS Iowa Gun turret....
Oh yeah, and this guy's model kicks ass
Behold the Graf Spee