Page 1 of 2

P-90

Posted: 2003-08-04 11:55pm
by Agent Fisher
is this a good firearm info on it

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:05am
by Vympel
No. Magazine jams like a bitch.

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:10am
by Sea Skimmer
It's also lightly constructed and its performance has been greatly over hyped. Only three nations bought a significant number, and one has trashed them in favor of G36K's.

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:43am
by Striderteen
PDWs like the P90 are designed to be last-ditch self-defense weapons for vehicle crews and/or rear-echelon personnell, not true combat weapons; they're a lot better than nothing, but you'd almost always be infinitely better off using an assault carbine or at least a full size submachine gun.

If you must have a PDW, the the Heckler & Koch MP7 completely trashes the P90 in every possible way -- it's smaller, longer-ranged, more accurate, penetrates better, doesn't jam as easily, doesn't get all the bullets in the magazine scrambled up if dropped, and even looks much cooler.

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:47am
by Agent Fisher
got a pic :?:

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:49am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
P90: http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg13-e.htm

HK-MP7: http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg49-e.htm

And it looks like a high-tech Uzi, too. ;)

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:05am
by TrailerParkJawa
Striderteen wrote: If you must have a PDW, the the Heckler & Koch MP7 completely trashes the P90 in every possible way -- it's smaller, longer-ranged, more accurate, penetrates better, doesn't jam as easily, doesn't get all the bullets in the magazine scrambled up if dropped, and even looks much cooler.
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:11am
by Sea Skimmer
TrailerParkJawa wrote:
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?
The P90 also uses a non-standard round, 5.7x28mm. Only one other FN weapon, a handgun, uses it. And that gun is also quite rare.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:15am
by TrailerParkJawa
Sea Skimmer wrote:
TrailerParkJawa wrote:
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?
The P90 also uses a non-standard round, 5.7x28mm. Only one other FN weapon, a handgun, uses it. And that gun is also quite rare.
Do you think these will catch on with NATO forces?

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:28am
by Pablo Sanchez
TrailerParkJawa wrote:Do you think these will catch on with NATO forces?
Perhaps the pistol, in very limited numbers. It has a large magazine and exceptional performance for a handgun. NATO forces are unlikely to use something that would require an entirely new round to be put into production and issued.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:37am
by weemadando
Damnit, just use the HK53 with a box magazine (40 or 50 rnds) and have the MP-7 as a backup.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:42am
by Lt. Dan
I don't know how I feel for either of them. They both look cool but looks aren't everything. Much less when you under fire.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:44am
by Sea Skimmer
Pablo Sanchez wrote:
Perhaps the pistol, in very limited numbers. It has a large magazine and exceptional performance for a handgun. NATO forces are unlikely to use something that would require an entirely new round to be put into production and issued.
Its stopping power is to low to get adapted; it really is and will remain a specialist weapon. Though with 95% of personal more likely to shoot them self then the enemy low powered handguns have an advantage. Evidently that was a major factor in convincing some armies to drop down to 9mm.
Damnit, just use the HK53 with a box magazine (40 or 50 rnds) and have the MP-7 as a backup.
You forgot the "use multi billion dollar budget to bring an infantry platoon on every mission" part.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:47am
by Lt. Dan
BTW, who uses the mp7?
And thanks for the site, I like it. :D

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:54am
by Sea Skimmer
Lt. Dan wrote:BTW, who uses the mp7?
And thanks for the site, I like it. :D
...You might try reading the appropriate page on the site in question.
The MP-7, first announced in 2000, entered production in 2001 and, according to some sources, is adopted by some German special units, such as KSK, and also offered for export sales and for NATO-trials as an another could-be NATO PDW (the only other competitor is FN P-90).



New guns often take several years to be evaluated and accepted into a nations military service so its unlikely that there have been many other customers buying more then a few examples for trials.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:56am
by Trytostaydead
Lt. Dan wrote:BTW, who uses the mp7?
And thanks for the site, I like it. :D
Stormtroopers at a Star Wars convention determined to set matters straight once and for all about the "rebel matter"

Posted: 2003-08-05 03:04am
by Howedar
The P90 is an interesting design project, but it is not and should not be considered a weapon suitable for combat.

Posted: 2003-08-05 10:57am
by Vympel
The entire PDW concept is a dumbfuck idea. It's just an excuse to give gun manufacturer's something to do. The HK 53 or any other small weapon using 5.56x45mm is fine for the job, the AKS-74U has been the gold standard in PDW on the other side of the fence for over two decades.

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:09pm
by Zed Snardbody
Unfortunately the West is in need of a PDW. The berata 9mm just doesn't have the stopping power or the penetration to deal with regular troops. It works fine for taking out your average street thug or militia man, but against proper troops with decent body armor, its just not going to cut it.

Posted: 2003-08-05 12:35pm
by Vympel
Zed Snardbody wrote:Unfortunately the West is in need of a PDW. The berata 9mm just doesn't have the stopping power or the penetration to deal with regular troops. It works fine for taking out your average street thug or militia man, but against proper troops with decent body armor, its just not going to cut it.
I don't dispute that, I'm saying that the concept for some new weapon with new ammo is stupid.

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:41pm
by Agent Fisher
okay. I didn't want this thread to be hijacked into a SGC thread. Please start your own thread and stop SPAMMING MINE!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil:

Posted: 2003-08-05 01:44pm
by Vertigo1
Agent Fisher wrote:okay. I didn't want this thread to be hijacked into a SGC thread. Please start your own thread and stop SPAMMING MINE!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil:
But its so fun! :D

Seriously though, both use p-90's so its somewhat on-topic. :)

Posted: 2003-08-05 02:15pm
by StarshipTitanic
You already got a ton of them...

Posted: 2003-08-05 06:29pm
by Howedar
Sea Skimmer wrote:The P90 looks futuristic to many and that likely a major reason why the SCG uses them, but then they say that about the AUG as well and I'd argue its the definition of an ugly gun.
Couldn't agree more. The AUG is butt-fucking-ugly.

Posted: 2003-08-05 06:32pm
by weemadando
Howedar wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:The P90 looks futuristic to many and that likely a major reason why the SCG uses them, but then they say that about the AUG as well and I'd argue its the definition of an ugly gun.
Couldn't agree more. The AUG is butt-fucking-ugly.
The AUG is a very nice weapon though. Once you fix the barrel melting, magazine warping and the IDIOTS who shoot with their face jammed up to the sight...