P-90
Posted: 2003-08-04 11:55pm
is this a good firearm info on it
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=27171
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?Striderteen wrote: If you must have a PDW, the the Heckler & Koch MP7 completely trashes the P90 in every possible way -- it's smaller, longer-ranged, more accurate, penetrates better, doesn't jam as easily, doesn't get all the bullets in the magazine scrambled up if dropped, and even looks much cooler.
The P90 also uses a non-standard round, 5.7x28mm. Only one other FN weapon, a handgun, uses it. And that gun is also quite rare.TrailerParkJawa wrote:
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?
Do you think these will catch on with NATO forces?Sea Skimmer wrote:The P90 also uses a non-standard round, 5.7x28mm. Only one other FN weapon, a handgun, uses it. And that gun is also quite rare.TrailerParkJawa wrote:
That HP-7 does look pretty cool. However, do you think non-standard ammo would be a concern?
Perhaps the pistol, in very limited numbers. It has a large magazine and exceptional performance for a handgun. NATO forces are unlikely to use something that would require an entirely new round to be put into production and issued.TrailerParkJawa wrote:Do you think these will catch on with NATO forces?
Its stopping power is to low to get adapted; it really is and will remain a specialist weapon. Though with 95% of personal more likely to shoot them self then the enemy low powered handguns have an advantage. Evidently that was a major factor in convincing some armies to drop down to 9mm.Pablo Sanchez wrote:
Perhaps the pistol, in very limited numbers. It has a large magazine and exceptional performance for a handgun. NATO forces are unlikely to use something that would require an entirely new round to be put into production and issued.
You forgot the "use multi billion dollar budget to bring an infantry platoon on every mission" part.Damnit, just use the HK53 with a box magazine (40 or 50 rnds) and have the MP-7 as a backup.
...You might try reading the appropriate page on the site in question.Lt. Dan wrote:BTW, who uses the mp7?
And thanks for the site, I like it.
The MP-7, first announced in 2000, entered production in 2001 and, according to some sources, is adopted by some German special units, such as KSK, and also offered for export sales and for NATO-trials as an another could-be NATO PDW (the only other competitor is FN P-90).
Stormtroopers at a Star Wars convention determined to set matters straight once and for all about the "rebel matter"Lt. Dan wrote:BTW, who uses the mp7?
And thanks for the site, I like it.
I don't dispute that, I'm saying that the concept for some new weapon with new ammo is stupid.Zed Snardbody wrote:Unfortunately the West is in need of a PDW. The berata 9mm just doesn't have the stopping power or the penetration to deal with regular troops. It works fine for taking out your average street thug or militia man, but against proper troops with decent body armor, its just not going to cut it.
But its so fun!Agent Fisher wrote:okay. I didn't want this thread to be hijacked into a SGC thread. Please start your own thread and stop SPAMMING MINE!!!!
Couldn't agree more. The AUG is butt-fucking-ugly.Sea Skimmer wrote:The P90 looks futuristic to many and that likely a major reason why the SCG uses them, but then they say that about the AUG as well and I'd argue its the definition of an ugly gun.
The AUG is a very nice weapon though. Once you fix the barrel melting, magazine warping and the IDIOTS who shoot with their face jammed up to the sight...Howedar wrote:Couldn't agree more. The AUG is butt-fucking-ugly.Sea Skimmer wrote:The P90 looks futuristic to many and that likely a major reason why the SCG uses them, but then they say that about the AUG as well and I'd argue its the definition of an ugly gun.