Page 1 of 1

Ok....

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:14pm
by RayCav of ASVS
This is for the "Would" thread, but I just felt like starting my own thread.

China's military.....

Image

F-7: MiG-21 knockoff with Western electronics. Most numerous fighter.

Image

F-8 Finback. Advanced interceptor with Western electronics. This was the one "shot down" by the EP-3 ARES a while back.

Image

J-9: F-7 replacement. Pakistan is to order some to replenish F-16 fleet.

Image

Possible J-10. The caption pretty much sums it up nicely.

Image

J-11: what they call the Flanker

J-12: Rumored JSF "copy"

Image

JH-7: failed domestic competitor to J-11 Flanker

Image

K-8: Standard trainer

Image

Q-5: Obsolete but still potent ground attack aircraft based on MiG-19 Farmer. Most numerous ground attacker.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:15pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Image

Theretical Chinese AWACS

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:16pm
by Master of Ossus
So, basically what you're saying is that China doesn't even have the ability to conquer Taiwan, and that it would stand no chance against the US if it ever tried to invade. Right?

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:18pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Image

Z-5 Hound

Image

Yep, same Dauphin. Used as both ASW and troop transport in PLA and PLAN

Image

D-4 drone

Image

All of their transports are knockoffs of early Soviet stuff. They have yet to appear to have an indiginous transport.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:19pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Image

Type 90, a completely indigenous tank despite its obvious resemblence to the T-80. They have far too many armor types to list, so this will just serve as a general example.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:20pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Master of Ossus wrote:So, basically what you're saying is that China doesn't even have the ability to conquer Taiwan, and that it would stand no chance against the US if it ever tried to invade. Right?
Not at all. If all the rumors are to be believed, China stands a good chance rivalling us in the near future.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:25pm
by Mr Bean
Yes China has about this many Anhip assets


0

Bulding any signfies they want to take Tawian which is why we have Satalites checking thier Navel Yards and Coats every few hours to see if they are trying to build anything

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:26pm
by IRG CommandoJoe
Well, it just depends on whether or not their air force is better than ours. Anything else is irrelevant. As soon as we gain air superiority, the war is ours.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:30pm
by Azeron
If you mean in say 20-30 years, if they don't

1) get themselves involved in a nuclear exchange
2) or break up in a civil war,
3) or go through a major financial
4) get involved in a major war

I consider the probablity of all happening high. As in each and every one happening. some more than once.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:30pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Now most importantly, PLAN assets:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/plan/cv.htm

Read the above. And think real hard....

Image

The Chinese bought two fully functional Sovremennies from the Russians

Image

Luhai destroyer, their most modern. Complete with French and German weapons and electronics.

Image

Luhu, a slightly differently armed version of the Luhai.

Image

Luda, their most numerous destroyer. Obsolete, but most have been upgraded with French systems.

Image

Jiangwei, their most powerful frigates. Very modern, and built with Western assistance.

Image

Jingwui, their most numerous frigate.

Image

Houjain class large missile boat.

Image

Houxin class missile boat

Image

The rest of their missile boats are Russian Osa knockoffs, but they have friggin many of them.

Image

Image

If your eyes are working, you know what those are.

Image

Han, their own version of the 688

Image

And of course the Russians have sold them Kilos up the wazoo.

And they do have amphib forces

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship ... /yukan.htm

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:34pm
by Mr Bean
Exuse me, EFFECTIVE Landing Assets, Thier current Ahibious assets besides being very poorly armored(Some Merchant ships are better armored) they simply are not very effective LD, Yukans are NOTRIOUS for swamping and flipping in a Storm and if you think they can make it from China to the US without running through a Storm NTM whatever we throw at them in-between here and there you are smoking somthing

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:37pm
by IRG CommandoJoe
Yes, but could any of that get here without being destroyed by our fighters and bombers???

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:38pm
by Azeron
as for the FAS, although they may seem credible, they have made some really big partisan blunders in the past. I would count them credible.

As for the PLAN, All the ships are at least 20 years behind ours. Soviet vessels were and always will be roundly inferior to ours.

There is nothing wester about the chinese vessels. Yes hey have a sleek exterior, but the tech is defintely from the 70's. Rusisan tech is for show, not fighting.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:39pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Mr Bean wrote:Exuse me, EFFECTIVE Landing Assets, Thier current Ahibious assets besides being very poorly armored(Some Merchant ships are better armored) they simply are not very effective LD, Yukans are NOTRIOUS for swamping and flipping in a Storm and if you think they can make it from China to the US without running through a Storm NTM whatever we throw at them in-between here and there you are smoking somthing
I actually was in the process of making that post when the others were discussing amphib assests. Yes, they suck, but they're working on it....

...though what they oughta do is by some Ivans from the Russkies.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:41pm
by IRG CommandoJoe
Actually...when you look my my original post, I said could they invade us successfully with their CURRENT military.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:41pm
by Mr Bean
Espcially the Subs, To say they would die like Red-shirts to Rangers is a bit of a understatment

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:43pm
by RayCav of ASVS
Mr Bean wrote:Espcially the Subs, To say they would die like Red-shirts to Rangers is a bit of a understatment
They have SSBNs. They could probably lob SLBMs at the US from port if they have to. And they're trying to build them like crazy (key word: TRYING)

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:44pm
by phongn
RayCav of ASVS wrote:Now most importantly, PLAN assets:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/row/plan/cv.htm

Read the above. And think real hard....
[/b]

Ah, so the PLA(N) is thinking of getting a few CVs, with no previous experience running them. It'll take years for them to get up to speed with carrier operations even after they're comissioned. In addition, it seems that they're planning on 40-kton ships. I'd take a CVF or the CdG over them, nevermind a modern USN CVN.
The Chinese bought two fully functional Sovremennies from the Russians
IIRC, Aegis should do pretty well against them, and if not a bunch of submarines will, as PLA(N) ASW doesn't seem too good.
Houjain class large missile boat.

Houxin class missile boat

The rest of their missile boats are Russian Osa knockoffs, but they have friggin many of them.
Missile boats are almost useless. They lack the sensors to effectively use their armament.
If your eyes are working, you know what those are.
IIRC, the Chinese boomers don't work very well, nor are they quiet enough to escape enemy fast-attack boats.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:47pm
by phongn
RayCav of ASVS wrote:
Mr Bean wrote:Espcially the Subs, To say they would die like Red-shirts to Rangers is a bit of a understatment
They have SSBNs. They could probably lob SLBMs at the US from port if they have to. And they're trying to build them like crazy (key word: TRYING)
FAS (whose information I take with large grains of salt) estimates an 8000-km range CSS-NX-4 (JL-2) with IOC in 2003, but there aren't any boomers in the PLA(N) capable of handling them. Their current CSS-N-3 (JL-1) only has a range of 1700-km.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:50pm
by phongn
IRG CommandoJoe wrote:Actually...when you look my my original post, I said could they invade us successfully with their CURRENT military.
Who is "us"? Taiwan? They don't have the amphibious assets to do that. Japan? Same problem. United States? Ditto.

Russia? They get nuked. SE Asia? They tried that in 1979 and got a beat-down. India? Yeah, right.

Posted: 2002-09-22 07:53pm
by IRG CommandoJoe
You can CLEARLY see I said us, meaning the u.s. :P