And I was in the Smithsonian and they had this one exhibition where they recorded earthquakes that happened in mainland US. The display would go through years very quickly and dots, with varying sizes, would fill up the screen, representing each individual quake.
Well, for about half a minute the display went through about 30 or so years and the East coast had maybe one or two. The New York and DC area had not a single earthquake.
California, on the other hand, was riddled with more dots that you'd find after you empty a gattling gun into a wooden box. And one bystander looked at the display and motioned his friend over to see it. He then said, "Now I know where I won't be living."
What's with that? California receives over a HUNDRED AND FORTY earthquakes per year, yet most are so miniscule you can hardly feel them. Additionally, most of the big ones are 3 or 4 pointers, which nearly all Californians will simply shrug off as if they were nothing.
Yet, East Coast people seem to have this view that California is a dangerous place, where neighborhoods topple and fall to ruin from earthquakes and all.
Ironicly, hurricanes wreak FAAAAARR more damage to a modern city than a earthquake can ever do, and hurricanes and other similar thunderstorms populate the East Coast.
So to you Easterners: earthquakes are VASTLY overrated, so stop looking at us Californians as if we're lunatics for living in a place that's far safer and far more pleasant weather-wise than where you guys live!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
To the board: What do you think?