Page 1 of 1
Wait a second...
Posted: 2003-08-27 07:49pm
by YT300000
My Mom asked me who owned SD.net. I replied truthfully: An engineer in Toronto.
Then, a few minutes later, I stumbled across one of Wong's posts in which he mentioned that he has sex with his wife. A lot.
An engineer with a sex life. That's not right. Then the cognitive dissonance kicked in, and I rationalized that Wong must be some sort of engineer god, because otherwise the engineer stereotype would be shattered.
So, what's true, is Michael Wong some sort of super1337enginner, or do I get too little sleep?
Posted: 2003-08-27 07:52pm
by Col. Crackpot
oh he's an engineer all right! he suffers from "i'm right because i'm an engineer dammit" syndrome. i see that everyday.
Posted: 2003-08-27 07:54pm
by StimNeuro
Sounds like you've been reading too much Dilbert. Just remember, no one wants to date an engineer, but everyone wants to marry them and get engineer-like offspring.
Posted: 2003-08-27 08:04pm
by Colonel Olrik
An engineer with a sex life. That's not right. Then the cognitive dissonance kicked in, and I rationalized that Wong must be some sort of engineer god, because otherwise the engineer stereotype would be shattered.
So, what's true, is Michael Wong some sort of super1337enginner, or do I get too little sleep?
Hey, watch it!
Col. Crackpot wrote:oh he's an engineer all right! he suffers from "i'm right because i'm an engineer dammit" syndrome. i see that everyday.
It's not a belief, it's the perfect truth.
Posted: 2003-08-27 08:08pm
by Mitth`raw`nuruodo
I think he's the super1337engineer. He probably looks something like
this, minus the weapon.
Posted: 2003-08-27 08:15pm
by Col. Crackpot
Colonel Olrik wrote:An engineer with a sex life. That's not right. Then the cognitive dissonance kicked in, and I rationalized that Wong must be some sort of engineer god, because otherwise the engineer stereotype would be shattered.
So, what's true, is Michael Wong some sort of super1337enginner, or do I get too little sleep?
Hey, watch it!
Col. Crackpot wrote:oh he's an engineer all right! he suffers from "i'm right because i'm an engineer dammit" syndrome. i see that everyday.
It's not a belief, it's the perfect truth.
great. another friggin' engineer
Posted: 2003-08-27 08:55pm
by Mark S
And here's another. And my wife and I have plenty of sex too. Dilbert is only true in so far as bosses.
Posted: 2003-08-27 11:42pm
by aerius
Engineers get laid lots, well, the well adjusted ones do. I may be in computers but I'm in the faculty of engineering and know quite a few engineers. The dorky ones are like Dilbert, the normal ones are like Mike.
Posted: 2003-08-27 11:46pm
by neoolong
aerius wrote:Engineers get laid lots, well, the well adjusted ones do. I may be in computers but I'm in the faculty of engineering and know quite a few engineers. The dorky ones are like Dilbert, the normal ones are like Mike.
When you say like Mike, do you mean have sex, or have a preoccupation with anal sex?
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:03am
by Utsanomiko
neoolong wrote:When you say like Mike, do you mean have sex, or have a preoccupation with anal sex?
If you think about it, it's more ironic than anything else; that an engineer is using a system for a task it's not even remotely designed for.
That reminds me, I still need to find a spare car battery to use with my old microwave oven and rifle stock to make that raygun I've been itching to build...
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:05am
by neoolong
Well, engineers seem to have a knack for using what they got. Even if it isn't what it was made for.
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:06am
by Darth Wong
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:neoolong wrote:When you say like Mike, do you mean have sex, or have a preoccupation with anal sex?
If you think about it, it's more ironic than anything else; that an engineer is using a system for a task it's not even remotely designed for.
That's why it requires active lubrication. Nothing that can't be solved with an expedient workaround.
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:08am
by HemlockGrey
That's why it requires active lubrication. Nothing that can't be solved with an expedient workaround.
'Expedient workaround'. That's one for the euphemism books.
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:08am
by kojikun
Darth Utsanomiko wrote:If you think about it, it's more ironic than anything else; that an engineer is using a system for a task it's not even remotely designed for.
Engineers don't care about what it's meant for, they care about whether it works or not for the purpose. Mmm buttsex.
Posted: 2003-08-28 12:15am
by Nathan F
Hey, us engineers and engineers-in-training are quite the ladies-men (or whatever you choose). We have just spread that rumor among the other males to keep the women to ourselves.