Page 1 of 3
Movies and tv show screw-up
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:21pm
by Montcalm
This thread is for listing the movies and tv shows where the military airplanes and helicopters are not the type mentioned,i`ll start.
Top Guns: trying to pass F-5 for Mig 29.
Iron Eagle: same thing using Mirage.
Next.
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:23pm
by TrailerParkJawa
Top Gun: Migs carry Exocet missiles.
Magnum PI: F-4 Phantom's are portrayed as MIG's.
Not exactly the same topic, but dont forget the numerous WWII movies of the 60's and 70's where German Panzers where M-48 or M-60 tanks with Iron Crosses painted on the side.
Re: Movies and tv show screw-up
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:25pm
by Alyeska
Montcalm wrote:This thread is for listing the movies and tv shows where the military airplanes and helicopters are not the type mentioned,i`ll start.
Top Guns: trying to pass F-5 for Mig 29.
Iron Eagle: same thing using Mirage.
Next.
Iron Eagle 2 tried passing off F4s as Migs. Iron Eagle 3 (or was it 4?) tried passing off F5s on the ground as F16s on the ground.
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:25pm
by Tsyroc
Alyeska wrote:Iron Eagle 2 was the worst. For some reason US Airforce pilots thought F4s were Migs, and for some reason the Russians got a hold of F4s and decided to claim they built them as Migs...
I think all of the planes for that Iron Eagle movie were provided by the Israeli airforce which is why there were only F-16s and F-4s.
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:27pm
by Tsyroc
In The Hunt for Red October the flight deck camera video of the F-14 crashing into the flight deck was not of an F-14.
That kind of annoyed me because there had to have been footage of an F-14 crashing that they could have used or at least faked better than that.
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:28pm
by Montcalm
Iron Eagle 3 they try to make us believe that an unknown type of airplane was a Me 262.
Re: Movies and tv show screw-up
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:29pm
by Peregrin Toker
Montcalm wrote:Top Guns: trying to pass F-5 for Mig 29.
Passing off a F-5 as a MiG-29?? WTF??
Anyone with a knowledge of aircraft can tell those aircraft apart - they bear none or little resemblance to each other. (not to mention the difference in size)
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:30pm
by Tsyroc
One of the reasons I can't watch J.A.G. is because of some of the liberties they take. IRC one where this super advanced computer controlled destroyer looked like something from our mothball fleet. Way too many visible guns for one thing.
The F-14 flying lawyer also bugs me. Not so much that he maintains his quals since lots of officers do stuff like that so they can keep getting flight pay etc... but that Harm seems to go on missions. Not necessarilly flying missions but he's a lawyer and he's going on covert missions.
Re: Movies and tv show screw-up
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:31pm
by TrailerParkJawa
Simon H.Johansen wrote:Montcalm wrote:Top Guns: trying to pass F-5 for Mig 29.
Passing off a F-5 as a MiG-29?? WTF??
Anyone with a knowledge of aircraft can tell those aircraft apart - they bear none or little resemblance to each other. (not to mention the difference in size)
Well, you have to remember at the time they filmed the show using "real" aggressor aircraft. At least they could have said the F-5 was a Mig-21. That would be more reasonable.
Re: Movies and tv show screw-up
Posted: 2003-09-01 02:33pm
by Tsyroc
Simon H.Johansen wrote:Montcalm wrote:Top Guns: trying to pass F-5 for Mig 29.
Passing off a F-5 as a MiG-29?? WTF??
Anyone with a knowledge of aircraft can tell those aircraft apart - they bear none or little resemblance to each other. (not to mention the difference in size)
Actually I believe they called them Mig-28s a totally fictitional plane that was supposed to be the latest and greatest according to the film.
Once again they had to make do with what was available from the agressor squadrons. I understand that later the Top Gun school got some F-16s for the aggressor squadrons but they took such a beating from all of the dog fighting that they we grounded quite a lot because of microfractures.
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:23pm
by TrailerParkJawa
I watched about half of Patton on cable yesterday. They did a good job of making planes that resembled Ju-88's. I suppose they could have been real, this was filmed back when Warbirds were more common. Anyone know?
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:28pm
by StarshipTitanic
I was just going to mention Patton. I believe that the tanks they use for the American side are called "Patton I's" but I'm not certain. Check imdb.
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:37pm
by Stormbringer
TrailerParkJawa wrote:I watched about half of Patton on cable yesterday. They did a good job of making planes that resembled Ju-88's. I suppose they could have been real, this was filmed back when Warbirds were more common. Anyone know?
I don't think so. There aren't a lot of German warbirds. More likely they're another aircraft mocked up to look like ju-88s.
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:42pm
by Col. Crackpot
Irion Eagle III had P-38's and Zero's dogfighting F-4's and F-5's. I mean come on!
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:45pm
by TrailerParkJawa
Stormbringer wrote:TrailerParkJawa wrote:I watched about half of Patton on cable yesterday. They did a good job of making planes that resembled Ju-88's. I suppose they could have been real, this was filmed back when Warbirds were more common. Anyone know?
I don't think so. There aren't a lot of German warbirds. More likely they're another aircraft mocked up to look like ju-88s.
Your probably right, out side of a few in a museum Ive never seen a German Warbird in flying condition.
Posted: 2003-09-02 01:50pm
by Companion Cube
Pearl Harbor: Trying to pass of Spruance-class destroyers as WW 2-era ships indicates a low respect for the audience's historical knowledge. That really annoyed me.
Posted: 2003-09-02 02:01pm
by Tsyroc
3rd Impact wrote:Pearl Harbor: Trying to pass of Spruance-class destroyers as WW 2-era ships indicates a low respect for the audience's historical knowledge. That really annoyed me.
Okay, now I am really glad I've never seen that movie.
Posted: 2003-09-02 02:05pm
by Straha
StarshipTitanic wrote:I was just going to mention Patton. I believe that the tanks they use for the American side are called "Patton I's" but I'm not certain. Check imdb.
I thought they used Pershings...
Posted: 2003-09-02 02:09pm
by Stormbringer
TrailerParkJawa wrote:Your probably right, out side of a few in a museum Ive never seen a German Warbird in flying condition.
Neither have I. There are some, put they're fairly rare.
Posted: 2003-09-02 02:54pm
by The Third Man
Rambo First Blood Part (I forget. The one where he was in Afghanistan). Aerospatiale Puma passed off as a Soviet helicopter. And a pile of burning plywood passed off as the same thing after being shot down.
Posted: 2003-09-02 03:13pm
by Montcalm
The Third Man wrote:Rambo First Blood Part (I forget. The one where he was in Afghanistan). Aerospatiale Puma passed off as a Soviet helicopter. And a pile of burning plywood passed off as the same thing after being shot down.
Rambo III
Posted: 2003-09-02 03:18pm
by Sea Skimmer
TrailerParkJawa wrote:
Not exactly the same topic, but dont forget the numerous WWII movies of the 60's and 70's where German Panzers where M-48 or M-60 tanks with Iron Crosses painted on the side.
A Bridge to Far used a modified Leopold 1 as their WW2 German tank, and a couple M109A2's shown briefly with nothing but a paint job as German WW2 SPG's. T-34's have been passed off as WW2 German tanks as well, though that's slightly acceptable since the Germans did use captured models, but only on the Eastern front.
Rambo III also had a French Gazelle passed of as a Soviet helicopter without modifications.
AT-6's where modified to look like several different Japanese aircraft for Tora Tora Tora
Posted: 2003-09-02 03:31pm
by Frank Hipper
Stormbringer wrote:TrailerParkJawa wrote:Your probably right, out side of a few in a museum Ive never seen a German Warbird in flying condition.
Neither have I. There are some, put they're fairly rare.
The planes in
Patton were Spanish built He 111s. The organisiation formerly known as The Confederate Air Force recently crashed the last flying example here in Arizona, killing the crew of two. It was a former personal transport of Gen. Franco, and appeared in
Patton, as well as
The Battle of Britain.
Posted: 2003-09-02 05:06pm
by Sea Skimmer
Frank Hipper wrote:Stormbringer wrote:TrailerParkJawa wrote:Your probably right, out side of a few in a museum Ive never seen a German Warbird in flying condition.
Neither have I. There are some, put they're fairly rare.
The planes in
Patton were Spanish built He 111s. The organisiation formerly known as The Confederate Air Force recently crashed the last flying example here in Arizona, killing the crew of two. It was a former personal transport of Gen. Franco, and appeared in
Patton, as well as
The Battle of Britain.
Well when they filmed
The Battle of Britain the Spanish didn't exactly have a shortage of them, 47 being used for the inspections scenes and for a few shots of large German formations. Though they only flew two to England for the air combat which I think was really very limiting to some shots. Especially since German bombers flew in trios.
Posted: 2003-09-02 05:14pm
by Stravo
Does anyone foresee a time in the future when some WWII militray equipment might be CGI'd for real accuracy (particualrly planes I assume) As the technology improves we might see CGI hordes of T-34's charging through a snowy tundra at emplaced German positions. Or am I just dreaming? I can see some studio exec going "A tank's a tank, who's going to know the difference?"