Page 1 of 1

Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Posted: 2003-09-02 09:26pm
by Tosho
today thirty years ago September 2, 1973 John Ronald Reul Tolkien passed away :cry: :cry: :cry:

Image

Posted: 2003-09-02 09:36pm
by LordShaithis
Perhaps his carcass will rise from the dead to strangle Gygax.

Re: Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Posted: 2003-09-02 09:46pm
by Shrykull
Tosho wrote:today thirty years ago September 2, 1973 John Ronald Reul Tolkien passed away :cry: :cry: :cry:

I Will Not Quote Pics
it says 71 on the stone not 73

Re: Tolkien we hardly knew thee:(

Posted: 2003-09-02 10:35pm
by Mark S
Shrykull wrote:it says 71 on the stone not 73
Maybe that's Edith.

Posted: 2003-09-02 10:37pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Yes. Edith died in 71, while Tolkien died in 73.

Posted: 2003-09-02 10:38pm
by Anarchist Bunny
71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.

Posted: 2003-09-02 11:28pm
by Gandalf
Earlier this year would have been his eleventy first birthday too. :(

Posted: 2003-09-03 10:30am
by Peregrin Toker
GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Perhaps his carcass will rise from the dead to strangle Gygax.
I'd rather like to see him strangle Terry Goodkind.

And, for that matter, Edgar Rice Burrough's carcass do something really nasty to John Norman.

Posted: 2003-09-03 10:53am
by Admiral Valdemar
anarchistbunny wrote:71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.
That much is obvious as I finally get around to reading The Salmon Of Doubt. :(

I wonder if Tolkien would approve of the latest incarnation of his famous fantasy tale.

Posted: 2003-09-03 11:19am
by Perinquus
Admiral Valdemar wrote:
anarchistbunny wrote:71?!?!?! Douglas Adams died too young.
That much is obvious as I finally get around to reading The Salmon Of Doubt. :(

I wonder if Tolkien would approve of the latest incarnation of his famous fantasy tale.
I suspect Tolkien would not have approved of the emasculation of King Theoden, and the transformation of the noble and strong-willed Faramir into just two more weak-willed men. The whole point was to show that though men might be weaker and more corruptible than elves, there were yet some truly noble ones among them, who were fit to stand beside the greatest elven heroes, and thus that men could be truly worthy heirs of Middle Earth. That's why it really pissed me off that Faramir became just another warrior greedy for the Ring. I can't for the life of me see why Peter Jackson made that change. It certainly doesn't improve the story any.

Posted: 2003-09-03 01:06pm
by Vendetta
Tolkien commented when the first radio adaptation of The Hobbit was made that his work was "eminently unsuitable" for adaptation.

As for the movie, I can hear him whirling in his grave from here,

Posted: 2003-09-04 09:59am
by Peregrin Toker
Vendetta wrote:Tolkien commented when the first radio adaptation of The Hobbit was made that his work was "eminently unsuitable" for adaptation.

As for the movie, I can hear him whirling in his grave from here,
That's probably just because of all the hacks ripping him off.