StarDestroyer.Net BBS

After class today, I was walking through the hallway towards the parking lot, when I see a friend of mine being hassled by some chick wearing about as much as a bathing suit in term of clothing. Eager to help my friend out (and equally eager for a closer look at this female), I went over to see what was going on.

I got as far as asking what was going on when this chick says: "he was staring at my tits!"

A bit taken aback, I looked her over REAL OBVIOUSLY and said "Lady, with the way you're dressed, a dwarf could stare at your tits. You have no right to complain." At which point, I nodded to my friend and we walked away, leaving her staring after us.




I think I'm gonig to like this college.

For the hypocritical whores or the lively conversation?

Stormbringer wrote:For the hypocritical whores or the lively conversation?

Yes.

Funny some chicks wear almost nothing on,and when we look they call us pervert.

Very good, comrade. You must now go and enjoy the sweet nectar of the gods for this brilliant achievement.

Oh yeah, see if you can get me a piccie of the perp.

Don't advertise if you don't want seen.

Stupid whore

LadyTevar wrote: Don't advertise if you don't want seen.

Stupid whore

If they're there, we're gonna stare.

Reminds me of a very relevant comedy skit from Dave Chapell.

He talks about women complaining that just because I dress like this doesn't make me a whore.

David responds thusly: I could put on a police officers uniform with badge and gun, walking down the street and you could run up to me screaming that someone is trying to mug you and I just say "Hey, lady, just because I'm dressed like a police officer doesn't mean I am one." The moral of this tale ladies? You may not be a whore, but you're certainly wearing a whore's uniform.

Boobs were made for men to stare at. Well, that and to dispense beverages.

Demiurge wrote:Boobs were made for men to stare at. Well, that and to dispense beverages.

No, breasts were made for touching.

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:

Demiurge wrote:Boobs were made for men to stare at. Well, that and to dispense beverages.

No, breasts were made for touching.

That can be dangerous. Women seem to dislike having men touch their breasts. No idea why.

I only recall a girl saying "stop looking at me!!" in a really annoyed way to me once and that time, I was looking primarly at her face.

Demiurge wrote: That can be dangerous. Women seem to dislike having men touch their breasts. No idea why.

Hmmm. They never dislike it when I touch them....perhaps you're doing something wrong.

Demiurge wrote:

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:

Demiurge wrote:Boobs were made for men to stare at. Well, that and to dispense beverages.

No, breasts were made for touching.

That can be dangerous. Women seem to dislike having men touch their breasts. No idea why.

You have to treat it nice and softly...think of how you'd want a woman to handle your balls.

that always happens to me... some girls don't like to be looked at, period.

Other dress to be looked at and then complain, makes em feel better about themselves, like they have some kind of control over us

or atleast... thats the only conclusion i can come up with

Oh look, barely a dozen posts and it's sexville already.

This forum loves it, mwahaha!

I wish I had some breats with me now.

I had a simular incident at my last school, but with a different out come.

During a frech class i got accused of looking at cleavage while in a conversation. Given that the girl was attractive, was dressed more revealingly than normal (non-uniform day) and i'm male she was probably right. She then asks if i'd like it if she stared at my genitals (not in a joking way but in a condesending /sarcastic/ <can't think of the exact word> way) , to which i said OK. So we spend the rest of the conversation with her staring at my crotch and me at her breasts. We laughed it off afterwards.

If there hadn't have been the rumours that i was gay and me being a complete nerd i reckon i might have had a very very very slim chance with her.

*stares misty eyed back into the past*

Ah who am i kidding, i didn't have a cat in hells chance!

edit: the complete nerd part wasn't a rumour, i did act like a geek!

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Oh look, barely a dozen posts and it's sexville already.

This forum loves it, mwahaha!

I wish I had some breats with me now.

Well, with the original topic it was kinda inevitable, but considering there's some 1400 individuals on this board it DOES have something of a one-track mind. I wonder if we're turning into some kind of collective...

'We are the sd.netizens. We will add your depravity and sexual distinctiveness to our own. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile, but DO try- we love it when they struggle'

i think its the age of the majority of the posters... hormones do scary things

At least it hasn't turned into Jmac's cereal box thread yet.

Stormbringer wrote:At least it hasn't turned into Jmac's cereal box thread yet.

bah! thats nothing. need i remind you of the Zaia-fication of the 'boys don't cook' thread a while back?

Col. Crackpot wrote:

Stormbringer wrote:At least it hasn't turned into Jmac's cereal box thread yet.

bah! thats nothing. need i remind you of the Zaia-fication of the 'boys don't cook' thread a while back?

Yeah. But that didn't have people wanking of in their cereal.

Col. Crackpot wrote:

Stormbringer wrote:At least it hasn't turned into Jmac's cereal box thread yet.

bah! thats nothing. need i remind you of the Zaia-fication of the 'boys don't cook' thread a while back?

I missed that one. Did it go totally Trinity-on-Poppins?

Stormbringer wrote:

Col. Crackpot wrote:

Stormbringer wrote:At least it hasn't turned into Jmac's cereal box thread yet.

bah! thats nothing. need i remind you of the Zaia-fication of the 'boys don't cook' thread a while back?

Yeah. But that didn't have people wanking of in their cereal.

WTF.... that sounds wrong on so many levels....

Zac Naloen wrote:

Stormbringer wrote:Yeah. But that didn't have people wanking of in their cereal.

WTF.... that sounds wrong on so many levels....

Because it is. Just so utterly wrong.