The World 2030: your prediction
Posted: 2003-09-05 11:38am
what do you think the world is going to be like in 27 years, In terms of technology, politics, and whatever else you can think of?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29455
Probably, since our politicians care more about getting votes from bluehairs than the long-term welfare of this country. I would take a dictatorship in a heartbeat if I felt it could fix the problems with Social Security and Medicare.Simon H.Johansen wrote:I've heard that if the USA don't pay their national debt, there won't go long time before China usurps their position as superpower...
I would not be surprised if they completely change the rules concerning retirement accounts in the future to futher fund Soc Security. My of my money for retirement ( not nearly enough at this point ) is in a Rollover IRA. That money will be taxed as normal income when I take it out , I would not be surprised if in the future the want to tax at least part of it while it is in the IRA.Durran Korr wrote: Although, I have heard it suggested that tax revenue from pensions, IRAs, and such may be enough to offset the Social Security and Medicare deficits that are causing the problem. What an ironic twist that would be; money from legitimate, wealth-generating investments ends up saving us from Social Security!
Although our politicians will probably just spend it and get us into even more debt.
*giggles like a schoolgirl*Simon H.Johansen wrote:I've heard that if the USA don't pay their national debt, there won't go long time before China usurps their position as superpower...
Yuk it up. If we don't take care of our shit at some point we're in for a world of shit in the future.Howedar wrote:*giggles like a schoolgirl*Simon H.Johansen wrote:I've heard that if the USA don't pay their national debt, there won't go long time before China usurps their position as superpower...
I'm surprised to see these words written by a guy who calls himself the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy's "Libertarian Auxiliary"... I thought that no libertarian would ever prefer an efficient dictatorship over an inefficient democracy.Durran Korr wrote:I would take a dictatorship in a heartbeat if I felt it could fix the problems with Social Security and Medicare.
Liberty is the first priority of libertarianism. And liberty and democracy are not always concurrent goals.Simon H.Johansen wrote:I'm surprised to see these words written by a guy who calls himself the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy's "Libertarian Auxiliary"... I thought that no libertarian would ever prefer an efficient dictatorship over an inefficient democracy.Durran Korr wrote:I would take a dictatorship in a heartbeat if I felt it could fix the problems with Social Security and Medicare.
it's sad to say the philosopher-king existed only, and will only ever exist, in Plato's mind.Durran Korr wrote: I would take a libertarian, benevolent dictatorship over the current government anyday. But that's pie-in-the-sky bullshit, since dictatorships have no real check on their power, unlike democracies.
just another thing to add to the weather forecast.SirNitram wrote:Highwire will complete it's first space elevator a mere ten years after the deadline, ushering in an era when lots of cheap satellites are in orbit. And when more crap falls down.
Maybe we should genetically engineer a philosopher-king : )Col. Crackpot wrote:it's sad to say the philosopher-king existed only, and will only ever exist, in Plato's mind.Durran Korr wrote: I would take a libertarian, benevolent dictatorship over the current government anyday. But that's pie-in-the-sky bullshit, since dictatorships have no real check on their power, unlike democracies.
We already have flying cars, although they're not being mass-produced and are expensive. http://www.moller.com/. Payload is crappy (800 lbs/363 kg max, IIRC counting passengers), but it has decent speed (375 mph/604 kph max, 300 mph/483 kph cruise), decent range (800 miles/1287 km, enough to travel one-way from Chicago to DC), and decent fuel economy (20+ miles/gallon, or about as much as my car gets on the freeway, and much better than an SUV). It needs a 35ft/10.7m diameter takeoff/landing pad, but is supposed to use automotive gasoline, and they're hoping to have FAA certification by end of 2005. Still kind of expensive, though (first few are expected to list for nearly $1 million USD, with later ones dropping down to $500k USD), but the only kink they have left seems to be the vertical takeoff and landing part...Zac Naloen wrote:FLYING CARS!!!!
and... and... we will all have genetically enhanced bodies and look like models cos thats really cool... and then some virus will appear that will kill everyone............ what?