StarDestroyer.Net BBS

If I had my way, I'd have the entire breast implant industry put
on trial for crimes against humanity regarding the porno industry...

Nothing ruins a good porno faster than tits the size of fucking beachballs.

Agreed.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Here Here! It's fucking nasty to see a good looking woman with a pair of jugs on her that would easily rival two normal (yet good looking) ones. It looks really, really painful, and it really doesn't make me horny.

I happen to be a fan of particularly petite(sp?) Breasts. Like they say, anything more than a handful is overflow. Not attractive at all, as a matter of fact, I don't understand why guys are so obsessed with large breasts (OTHER guys, not us. We're a board full of perverts who want to see mary poppins and Trinity having Hot, Lesbian sex, to coin a phrase.

Balloon boobs bounce but they don't change shape!!??

Fake breasts are a dehumanizing trait, which I suspect were invented to prepare society for androids (which will unlikely ever appear completely human, so the industry and media has opted to 'meet in the middle', so to speak). I also hear they have the added bonus of feeling horrible.

Why some people think that breasts larger than the woman's head is sexy, I don't know.

Yeah, super-sized breasts are fucking nasty....I absolutely abhor that shit.

heh. I much prefer natural to synthetic. if I want a barbie doll, I can go to toysrus.

When I was at college, I saw a porno with an "actress" who obviously had fake breasts. I could tell because they were squares.

I haven't a clue why anyone considers that attractive.

Maybe some people like seeing balloons bounce up!

If so

*gets two ballons and stuffs them down his shirt*

totally babilscious.

MKSheppard wrote:Maybe some people like seeing balloons bounce up!

If so

*gets two ballons and stuffs them down his shirt*

*Pops balloons for the sake of humanity*

The grossest part of implants is they practically hang farther out when the woman is lying on her back than if she's standing or bending over. Those damn implants simply don't move, it's creepy, especially when they're only connected to their body by an area half as big as the breast itself, and it has a lot of underside skin because it's simpyl too big to hold on their chest. It's all part of a dellusion, I'd guess.

I also find the obvious infection marks really disgusting and gross, and why haven't some monkeys stolen this thread yet?

Darth Utsanomiko wrote: *Pops balloons for the sake of humanity*

NOOO my MANTITS! NOOO

Ummm, WHAT? Look, if I can touch them they are real in my book. I would rate breast implants right up there with Guttenburg's printing press in terms the best inventions in history.

As for preferring smaller breasts... What do you do with those? I've tried titty F&@*ing smaller ones, and the big ones are MUCH better. And what the hell are you supposed to hold on to? Her nipples?

Ok, natural are indeed the best. I would still take implants over feeling up or screwing a table top though.

Yosemite Bear, I heard your monkey call and came running...

[walks into thread... reads first post... walks out of thread...]

Though.. you do have a point, Shep.

~ver

*supplies Shep the guns 'n' ammo*

I think I made my stance on breast implants clear...

They have no place in the human body. The only case I could think of is for breast reconstruction after a mastectomy, and I'm not even sure they're used for that purpose.

Well what about my sister, Dolly Parton and Adrianne B. (Escape from New York, Swamp Thing, Batman the Animated Series), they are at the natural upperlimits for humans, and still look better then those crotesqueres that show up, because at least there is an actual SYMMETRY to woemn who have big tit's in nature. they usually aren't just "Top heavy".

The Yosemite Bear wrote:Well what about my sister, Dolly Parton and Adrianne B. (Escape from New York, Swamp Thing, Batman the Animated Series), they are at the natural upperlimits for humans, and still look better then those crotesqueres that show up, because at least there is an actual SYMMETRY to woemn who have big tit's in nature. they usually aren't just "Top heavy".

Exactly: there's a natural set of proportions to the body. Aesthetically, (sp?) fake boobs look... fake. You can tell from the woman's form that they're not natural. Aside from that, they don't move right and the breast tissue hardens. That's before you even get into the issue of leakage, infections, loss of sensitivity in the nerves or lower back problems. There's no good reason for them and a lot of good reasons against them.

*edit*: added the word "right after move

Not to mention I have yet to see somone show women with big breasts and the Botticelli-esq hips that would naturally go with that.

mind you I am found of the Botticelli look....

I am not a fan of breasts implants. They hardly ever look realistic, and I find them aesthetically unappealing in the extreme for pretty much the same reasons as Uts.

I'm also not much of a fan of larger breasts in general. Generally B size and tops out at about upper C. Smaller breasts are a personal fetish, so it's not like I would turn a woman down just because she had Ds or such, unless they were implants...

Of course this is the same distorted frame where you have to starve actresses concentration camp thin....