Ok....
Posted: 2002-09-29 09:01pm
just a question....
why isn't Lord Wong responding to my PM's anymore?
why isn't Lord Wong responding to my PM's anymore?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3209
Yeah, gotcha, should've caught that myselfDarth Wong wrote:I don't answer most of my PM's lately (kind of busy lately, what with some emergencies at work, a white-supremacist invasion, the Darkstar debate, etc).
Fighter mounted lasers triggering a small nuclear device is the clear and obvious solution.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:What sort of emergencies at work? Trying to figure out how to stop incoming asteroids that will destroy all life on Earth?
Ahem. A LARGE nuclear device.Sea Skimmer wrote:Fighter mounted lasers triggering a small nuclear device is the clear and obvious solution.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:What sort of emergencies at work? Trying to figure out how to stop incoming asteroids that will destroy all life on Earth?
Yes of course, a large nuclear device, which will be buried inside of a comet to knock it onto an intercepting course with the asteroid. That should work prefectlyDarth Wong wrote:Ahem. A LARGE nuclear device.Sea Skimmer wrote:Fighter mounted lasers triggering a small nuclear device is the clear and obvious solution.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:What sort of emergencies at work? Trying to figure out how to stop incoming asteroids that will destroy all life on Earth?
Stand-off explosion, actually. Detonate the nuke to one side of the asteroid. The intense ionizing radiation burst boils off the surface of the asteroid on that side, which acts like a rocket and pushes it aside, thus changing its trajectory. Rinse and repeat as necessary.Sea Skimmer wrote:Yes of course, a large nuclear device, which will be buried inside of a comet to knock it onto an intercepting course with the asteroid. That should work prefectly
I known, but that would actually work in real life, and does't require combined ideas for multiple bad anti physics movies into a impossibul plan.Darth Wong wrote:Stand-off explosion, actually. Detonate the nuke to one side of the asteroid. The intense ionizing radiation burst boils off the surface of the asteroid on that side, which acts like a rocket and pushes it aside, thus changing its trajectory. Rinse and repeat as necessary.Sea Skimmer wrote:Yes of course, a large nuclear device, which will be buried inside of a comet to knock it onto an intercepting course with the asteroid. That should work prefectly
The US and Russian militaries and civilian space agency's had a conference on this a few years ago. The plan called for using a 9-megaton B-53 bomb or a B-61 dial a yeild if the target was small. This would be launched by a Russian space booster to do just what you have described. IIRC they figured they needed at the very minimal six months of prep time to build the delivery vehicle for the actual interception.Darth Wong wrote:The trick is not nuclear armament; it is TIME. We need very early warning of an asteroid headed our way; preferably years. This way, we need only nudge it a tiny fraction of a degree to make it miss us.
This would also give us time to develop appropriate delivery devices; you can't just shoot an ICBM at an asterod which is millions of kilometres away; ICBM's don't have that kind of propulsive power. Similarly, the Space Shuttle isn't going to get the job done; we would need a remote-pilotable or well-guided missile which carries a large nuclear payload and has sufficient thruster power to reach the incoming rock and detonate with such precise timing and location that it accomplishes the objective. On short notice, I presume we would have to design and build something and then deploy it from orbit, presumably by taking it up there on the Space Shuttle or some similar orbital launch vehicle.
If it detonates directly ahead of the rock, it accomplishes nothing. If it detonates behind the rock, it accomplishes nothing. If it hits the rock, it won't even detonate properly. If we assume a +/- 5 km margin of error, it has to fly by the rock and detonate with 0.1 millisecond accuracy to efficiently redirect the asteroid.
Obviously, it would be good to have two cracks at this, so it would be nice to catch it on an earlier orbit where you have another year or two to correct and try again if you fuck up.
planetary shieldSea Skimmer wrote:Fighter mounted lasers triggering a small nuclear device is the clear and obvious solution.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:What sort of emergencies at work? Trying to figure out how to stop incoming asteroids that will destroy all life on Earth?
One less catastrophie to worry about. LOLThe US and Russian militaries and civilian space agency's had a conference on this a few years ago. The plan called for using a 9-megaton B-53 bomb or a B-61 dial a yeild if the target was small. This would be launched by a Russian space booster to do just what you have described. IIRC they figured they needed at the very minimal six months of prep time to build the delivery vehicle for the actual interception.
Uh, no. We've had big rocks streak by us with only a few weeks warning. Just enough time to put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:One less catastrophie to worry about. LOL
BFG?Cyril wrote:I like the planetary shield idea. Or, we could build a really BFG. Whichever.[/b]
D'OH!Uh, no. We've had big rocks streak by us with only a few weeks warning. Just enough time to put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye.