Making beer.
Posted: 2003-10-20 10:37pm
How would one go about this properly, then proceed to remove the alcohol so it's not toxic?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32439
Yeah, I figured as such. I want to make bread-beer, but not sure about the actually process.Exonerate wrote:IIRC, alcohol has a lower boiling temperature than water, so you could try distilation.
You sure that works with non-alcholic bread?kojikun wrote:Yeah, I figured as such. I want to make bread-beer, but not sure about the actually process.Exonerate wrote:IIRC, alcohol has a lower boiling temperature than water, so you could try distilation.
Oh, I thought when you said bread-beer, you meant bread made from beer. Also known as beer-bread.kojikun wrote:.. You use the bread as the base from which to ferment.. .. ....................
Oh, you are intersted in non-alcholic beer? Well that actually isn't too difficult, it is just a matter of not using sugars or yeast. It is still possible to create the same flavor and actually the process itself should be slightly easier. The book I recommended has some info on this (I've never done it) but why wouldn't you want beer without alchohol? If you don't like getting drunk, make yourself a nice 3% beer and don't drink very much but the fermentation and yeast adds to the flavor of the beer so unless you plan on loading it up with hops, I would recommend you keep at least SOME alchohol.kojikun wrote:How would one go about this properly, then proceed to remove the alcohol so it's not toxic?
I want the flavor and everything, minus the alcohol. Because alcohol is toxic. And toxic is bad. Even 3% is bad. Thats why I figure I would distill it.The Kernel wrote:snip
You don't "distill" beer, you brew it. If you are interested, pick up the book to get you started. Distillation is the process used to make hard alchohol and it is illegal in most places for a very good reason: you can kill or blind yourself if you don't know what you are doing.kojikun wrote:I want the flavor and everything, minus the alcohol. Because alcohol is toxic. And toxic is bad. Even 3% is bad. Thats why I figure I would distill it.The Kernel wrote:snip
I mean distill it afterwards. And not even collecting the alcohol, just allowing it to evaporate into the atmosphere. Perhaps having a match over the thing would be better so it burns and theres no stray alcohol in the air, but whatever.The Kernel wrote:You don't "distill" beer, you brew it. If you are interested, pick up the book to get you started. Distillation is the process used to make hard alchohol and it is illegal in most places for a very good reason: you can kill or blind yourself if you don't know what you are doing.
I'd rather not add to the number of toxins i take it, thanks. If I ever brew some of this shit, I'll tell you how it works out. It'll be interesting, to say the least.As for your feelings about alchohol being toxic...well you probably get more toxins from the air you breathe or solar radiation...in any case, 3% beer isn't going to kill you. However, it sounds like you have your mind made up about it so I won't try to convince you.
Why? Does the alcohol add the much of the flavor?Frank Hipper wrote:koji, why on Earth would you want non-alchoholic beer? Surely not the flavor, because even the finest beer in the world is absolutely vile without the alchoholic content.
But wheres the fun in that? Theres no pride to take in creating anything, no accomplishment, nothing to hold and say "I made this", the fact of which makes it taste all the better.If you're that curious, and that afraid of booze, go buy a six-pack of O'Douls. So much easier, and quicker.
Frank's exagerating some. But non-alcoholic beer isn't very good.kojikun wrote:Why? Does the alcohol add the much of the flavor?Frank Hipper wrote:koji, why on Earth would you want non-alchoholic beer? Surely not the flavor, because even the finest beer in the world is absolutely vile without the alchoholic content.
My point was that beer isn't very good. Even the best beer is an aquired taste, because it's a bad taste. It's not something people taste for the first time and think, "Delicious!".Stormbringer wrote:Frank's exagerating some. But non-alcoholic beer isn't very good.kojikun wrote:Why? Does the alcohol add the much of the flavor?Frank Hipper wrote:koji, why on Earth would you want non-alchoholic beer? Surely not the flavor, because even the finest beer in the world is absolutely vile without the alchoholic content.
My point was that beer isn't very good. Even the best beer is an aquired taste, because it's a bad taste. It's not something people taste for the first time and think, "Delicious!". [/quote]Frank Hipper wrote:Frank's exagerating some. But non-alcoholic beer isn't very good.
But would you really want to say "I made this beer" When it's all chunky, frothy, and disgusting, and not have any alchohal to make it better?kojikun wrote:But wheres the fun in that? Theres no pride to take in creating anything, no accomplishment, nothing to hold and say "I made this", the fact of which makes it taste all the better.If you're that curious, and that afraid of booze, go buy a six-pack of O'Douls. So much easier, and quicker.
I aint makin' nasty chunky beer, fuck no.Straha wrote:But would you really want to say "I made this beer" When it's all chunky, frothy, and disgusting, and not have any alchohal to make it better?
I rest my case