Page 1 of 2
'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...
Posted: 2003-10-26 01:45am
by Superman
My god, my girl rented and is watching this piece of trash right now. This is absolutely horrible and beyond stupid. I really think you have to have an IQ in the negative range to enjoy this tripe.
Have you seen it?
Posted: 2003-10-26 01:46am
by Joe
What were you expecting, Shakespeare?
I've seen it, and I hate myself for it. The worse thing about it, is just about everyone in the movie is completely above the material.
Posted: 2003-10-26 01:47am
by Darth Wong
When I saw them advertising it with pictures of the three actresses wearing skimpy clothes in Maxim magazine, I realized what a shit movie it must be. You don't pull out the stops like that to advertise a film that you already think is going to do well at the box office.
If I want to see T&A in bad plots, I'll watch a selection from my extensive collection of pornography.
Posted: 2003-10-26 01:52am
by Superman
I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.
Posted: 2003-10-26 02:01am
by SyntaxVorlon
Superman wrote:I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.
You ought to realize that half of them are dumber than that!
Posted: 2003-10-26 09:03am
by Ghost Rider
I've seen it...more glad then not I knew the manager at the theatre so I got free tickets.
It was pretty much low end porn tease...nothing more.
Posted: 2003-10-26 09:47am
by Demiurge
I might watch it if it had more attractive women. As it is, Drew Barrymore's ass is not enough to warrant a rental.
Don't get me wrong, they're not ugly. I just don't think that they're as great as most say.
Posted: 2003-10-26 09:52am
by MKSheppard
THey must die for besmirching the name of the Ka-52
Posted: 2003-10-26 09:58am
by 2000AD
So it had a predictable pot, not too good action and a crap soundtrack, but it also had Cameron Diaz in a bakini!!! That on it'self redeemed the whole movie for me
Posted: 2003-10-26 10:03am
by Vympel
When I saw the preview and saw it, it looked like the movie rode the 'short bus' so to speak- seriously, it looked retarded. I couldn't understand what was going on. Even the presence of a Ka-52 couldn't get me to watch it.
Posted: 2003-10-26 11:37am
by Montcalm
Well one more movie to my list of movies i will not waste money to see,if i ever watch it i`ll wait for it to air on tv,just like the first Charlie`s angels that airs this week on a FC network.
Posted: 2003-10-26 12:26pm
by InnerBrat
Saw it, loved it. So there
Posted: 2003-10-26 01:10pm
by YT300000
The only good thing about that piece of shit was that it had a .50 Desert Eagle. Come to think of it, it had two.
Still sucked, though.
Posted: 2003-10-26 07:35pm
by DPDarkPrimus
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Posted: 2003-10-27 01:55am
by EmperorMing
It was cheap entertainment when a friend of mine rented it.
And I have seen worse.
Posted: 2003-10-27 02:25am
by DPDarkPrimus
EmperorMing wrote:
And I have seen worse.
Which is shining testamount to a movie's quality, considering how crappy so many movies are.
Re: 'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...
Posted: 2003-10-27 02:44am
by Kuja
Superman wrote:Have you seen it?
I haven't, but I can still virtually guarantee that House of the Dead was worse.
Posted: 2003-10-27 04:59am
by InnerBrat
DPDarkPrimus wrote:InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
Posted: 2003-10-27 06:20am
by EmperorMing
InnerBrat wrote:DPDarkPrimus wrote:InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
You're forgiven...
Posted: 2003-10-27 09:17am
by Crown
I enjoyed the movie.
Posted: 2003-10-27 09:22am
by Darth Fanboy
InnerBrat wrote:Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
.........SIGGED!
Posted: 2003-10-27 03:54pm
by Death from the Sea
Ok,
Demi Moore= sexy
Lucy Lui= sexy
Cameron Diaz= sexy(except when she was in the CSI disguise)
Drew Barrymore= NOT sexy, I don't think she looked good in a single part of that movie.
the movie was crap but it was good for some eye candy.
Posted: 2003-10-27 04:16pm
by DPDarkPrimus
InnerBrat wrote:DPDarkPrimus wrote:InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there
Possible bias note: You're a girl.
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
Can't argue with that.
Posted: 2003-10-27 04:47pm
by Montcalm
Last night i watched the first Charlie`s Angels movie,and the action was mildly interesting some scenes were too unrealistic others plain stupid,the girls have too much knowledge of weaponry to be believable.
and Bosley (Bill Murray) carving a gun in soap with his teeth
come on
Posted: 2003-10-27 04:49pm
by aphexmonster
i fell asleep both times i tried to watch the first one.... i didn't bother going to see the second one. putting " smack my bitch up" in a movie doesn't improve it, but most action movie directors seem to think it does ....
( lets pump up the crowd )