Page 1 of 2

'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...

Posted: 2003-10-26 01:45am
by Superman
My god, my girl rented and is watching this piece of trash right now. This is absolutely horrible and beyond stupid. I really think you have to have an IQ in the negative range to enjoy this tripe.

Have you seen it?

Posted: 2003-10-26 01:46am
by Joe
What were you expecting, Shakespeare?

I've seen it, and I hate myself for it. The worse thing about it, is just about everyone in the movie is completely above the material.

Posted: 2003-10-26 01:47am
by Darth Wong
When I saw them advertising it with pictures of the three actresses wearing skimpy clothes in Maxim magazine, I realized what a shit movie it must be. You don't pull out the stops like that to advertise a film that you already think is going to do well at the box office.

If I want to see T&A in bad plots, I'll watch a selection from my extensive collection of pornography.

Posted: 2003-10-26 01:52am
by Superman
I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.

Posted: 2003-10-26 02:01am
by SyntaxVorlon
Superman wrote:I just looked at the reviews for this on Yahoo. The average watcher gave it a 'B.' I am officially giving up hope for the human race. The average person is an idiot. I always knew it, but this really drives it home.
You ought to realize that half of them are dumber than that!

Posted: 2003-10-26 09:03am
by Ghost Rider
I've seen it...more glad then not I knew the manager at the theatre so I got free tickets.

It was pretty much low end porn tease...nothing more.

Posted: 2003-10-26 09:47am
by Demiurge
I might watch it if it had more attractive women. As it is, Drew Barrymore's ass is not enough to warrant a rental.

Don't get me wrong, they're not ugly. I just don't think that they're as great as most say.

Posted: 2003-10-26 09:52am
by MKSheppard
THey must die for besmirching the name of the Ka-52

Posted: 2003-10-26 09:58am
by 2000AD
So it had a predictable pot, not too good action and a crap soundtrack, but it also had Cameron Diaz in a bakini!!! That on it'self redeemed the whole movie for me :D

Posted: 2003-10-26 10:03am
by Vympel
When I saw the preview and saw it, it looked like the movie rode the 'short bus' so to speak- seriously, it looked retarded. I couldn't understand what was going on. Even the presence of a Ka-52 couldn't get me to watch it.

Posted: 2003-10-26 11:37am
by Montcalm
Well one more movie to my list of movies i will not waste money to see,if i ever watch it i`ll wait for it to air on tv,just like the first Charlie`s angels that airs this week on a FC network.

Posted: 2003-10-26 12:26pm
by InnerBrat
Saw it, loved it. So there :P

Posted: 2003-10-26 01:10pm
by YT300000
The only good thing about that piece of shit was that it had a .50 Desert Eagle. Come to think of it, it had two.

Still sucked, though.

Posted: 2003-10-26 07:35pm
by DPDarkPrimus
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there :P
Possible bias note: You're a girl. :P

Posted: 2003-10-27 01:55am
by EmperorMing
It was cheap entertainment when a friend of mine rented it. :P

And I have seen worse. :wink:

Posted: 2003-10-27 02:25am
by DPDarkPrimus
EmperorMing wrote: And I have seen worse.
Which is shining testamount to a movie's quality, considering how crappy so many movies are. :roll:

Re: 'Charlie's Angels 2' Kill me now...

Posted: 2003-10-27 02:44am
by Kuja
Superman wrote:Have you seen it?
I haven't, but I can still virtually guarantee that House of the Dead was worse. :D

Posted: 2003-10-27 04:59am
by InnerBrat
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there :P
Possible bias note: You're a girl. :P
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

Posted: 2003-10-27 06:20am
by EmperorMing
InnerBrat wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there :P
Possible bias note: You're a girl. :P
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
You're forgiven... :twisted: :twisted: :P

Posted: 2003-10-27 09:17am
by Crown
I enjoyed the movie.

Posted: 2003-10-27 09:22am
by Darth Fanboy
InnerBrat wrote:Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore

.........SIGGED!

Posted: 2003-10-27 03:54pm
by Death from the Sea
Ok,
Demi Moore= sexy
Lucy Lui= sexy
Cameron Diaz= sexy(except when she was in the CSI disguise)
Drew Barrymore= NOT sexy, I don't think she looked good in a single part of that movie.

the movie was crap but it was good for some eye candy.

Posted: 2003-10-27 04:16pm
by DPDarkPrimus
InnerBrat wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:
InnerBrat wrote:Saw it, loved it. So there :P
Possible bias note: You're a girl. :P
Additional possible bias note: I want to have hot steamy sex with Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore
Can't argue with that. :P

Posted: 2003-10-27 04:47pm
by Montcalm
Last night i watched the first Charlie`s Angels movie,and the action was mildly interesting some scenes were too unrealistic others plain stupid,the girls have too much knowledge of weaponry to be believable.

and Bosley (Bill Murray) carving a gun in soap with his teeth come on :roll:

Posted: 2003-10-27 04:49pm
by aphexmonster
i fell asleep both times i tried to watch the first one.... i didn't bother going to see the second one. putting " smack my bitch up" in a movie doesn't improve it, but most action movie directors seem to think it does ....



( lets pump up the crowd )