Page 1 of 2

A matter of personal preference

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:18am
by Alferd Packer
The question is simple: would you, in your life, prefer being an expert at one thing (say a master surgeon or engineer) or a so-called jack of all trades, but a master of none?

I, for one, currently want to be a renaissance man. My two majors are about as disparate as you can get (Computer Science and German) and I take Japanese history classes as sort of a personal interest. I peruse scientific websites, fantasy websites, read just about anything that isn't by Faulkner, and try to gain a little insight for maintaining my truck from time. Oh, and once in a while I write.

So yeah. I'm all over the place, but I like it. For now.

Howzabout you?

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:21am
by Gil Hamilton
I'd want to be an expert, since there is no reason why I can't be good at another things as well, and chances are, since i'm such a hotshot, I am. Besides, experts make much more money.

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:22am
by Tsyroc
So far my personal limitations have told me I'm a rather weak "Jack of All Trades" but if I really applied myself it'd probably work.

Unfortunately I don't think I'll ever be an expert at anything and that means I certainly couldn't do both.

I certainly wouldn't mind sleeping in the rest of my life. :)

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:22am
by BlkbrryTheGreat
How many jack of all trades are remembered in history for their accomplishments? None. Sorry, but if you really want to make any sort of signifigant, long lasting contrabution to soceity you have to specialize. If you want to be a jack of all trades just because you enjoy learning thats another matter. Don't delude yourself that becoming a "jack" is a big accomplishment though, its relativly easy to gain cursory knowledge of many areas.... mastery requires hard work.

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:26am
by Howedar
It depends on how inept I'd be at other subjects, I might go either way. I want to be competent at everything, certainly, but I want to be good at something too.

Posted: 2003-11-01 01:56am
by Agent R
Jack of all trades for me. I prefer being fairly useful in many areas over simply being asked to do a single thing because I'm so good at it. Besides, I don't really apply myself enough to gain any mastery.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:00am
by TrailerParkJawa
Im like Tsyroc , Im a weak Jack of all Trades. Id like to be more of an expert in one field but I suppose Id be changing who I am in doing so. What I would really like is to no longer be so damn forgetfull. I spent 20 minutes this morning looking for my glasses which I had set on my dresser. What I didnt notice or remember was placing Aviation Week on top of my glasses thus hiding them from view.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:04am
by Hethrir
I want to know a little about everything.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:04am
by Darth Wong
"Greatest in the world" at something is better than "OK at lots of things".

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:14am
by Howedar
Unless you're one of those math geniuses who can't tie their shoes.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:15am
by BrYaN19kc
I enjoy learning all sorts of new things, and try to learn as much as I can and bout different areas. Those who "think" they are an expert on one thing tend to be conceited and end up finding themselves outdated because they refuse to learn anything different or new.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:23am
by Spanky The Dolphin
In addition to immortality, another goal of mine is to know everything. :P

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:40am
by Cyborg Stan
Being an expert in one thing seems to be more useful in a complex society like our own, since one can concentrate on doing a very useful and intricate undertaking without worrying about other fields.

Mentally, I seem to prefer the jack-of-all-trades approach which seems to be more fun. Ideally of course it would be an expert in anything, with the goal of knowing/making the connections to everything in the Universe.

I'm wondering if we can predict how one would answer this question according to the J/P dimension of MBTI/Kiersey typing. (Incidently, I probably have a pretty strong P factor.)

.....Checking up on the typings I have archived, it actually did fall into the expected perference for me (INTP, thinks Jack-of-All fun despite the usefulness of expert) and Darth Wong (ENTJ, obviously expert-perfering), although Tsyroc and TrailerParkJawa are either ambigious or fall opposite of expected. (Both ISTJ, according to my archives. Hmmmmm......) Spanky The Dolphin (ISTP) I would say would have the expected result, although I can't really say since exact spread of knowing everything isn't specified : Is he talking about knowing everything about one subject, then moving on to another times infinity, or rapidly shooting tons of assorted facts in the brain and connecting them together?

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:41am
by Crayz9000
I tend to focus heavily on the sciences, but I enjoy doing stuff on the side. I can cook, repair most anything that's mechanical, write, etc...

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:42am
by Shinova
If I like it and want to do it, I can master it.


But barring that, I don't know. I'll have to give some deeper thought to it.

Posted: 2003-11-01 02:44am
by RedImperator
I'd gladly settle for being a lousy cook, a bad driver, a dancer with two left feet, and the singing voice of a dying hyena if I could be, say, the greatest writer ever in the history of the English language. Of course, I'm already three of those four things anyway.

Re: A matter of personal preference

Posted: 2003-11-01 03:34am
by jegs2
Alferd Packer wrote:Howzabout you?
An Army officer is a jack of all trades, master of none. NCOs and warrant officers are masters of their trades.

Posted: 2003-11-01 04:29am
by neoolong
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:How many jack of all trades are remembered in history for their accomplishments? None. Sorry, but if you really want to make any sort of signifigant, long lasting contrabution to soceity you have to specialize. If you want to be a jack of all trades just because you enjoy learning thats another matter. Don't delude yourself that becoming a "jack" is a big accomplishment though, its relativly easy to gain cursory knowledge of many areas.... mastery requires hard work.
Actually quite a few. Ben Franklin was a "jack of all trades." He invented, he wrote, he was a diplomat, etc. Back then a lot of people had many talents.

As for me, I'd be rather be an expert in something.

Posted: 2003-11-01 04:43am
by DPDarkPrimus
Da Vinci was a bona fide jack of all trades as well.

Posted: 2003-11-01 05:25am
by Gandalf
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:In addition to immortality, another goal of mine is to know everything. :P
Wouldn't that include the look of all naked people?

Posted: 2003-11-01 05:31am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Factual knowledge, you doorknob... :roll:

Unlike most of my gender, I think with my brain more often than I do with my penis.

Posted: 2003-11-01 05:40am
by Gandalf
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Factual knowledge, you doorknob... :roll:

Unlike most of my gender, I think with my brain more often than I do with my penis.
Forgive me, I'm 18, I'm a 6 foot tall hormone.

Posted: 2003-11-01 06:50am
by Sarevok
In today's society it is impossible to know everything. It is better to be an expert in one field.

Posted: 2003-11-01 07:11am
by salm
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:How many jack of all trades are remembered in history for their accomplishments? None.
Walter Gropius
Frank LLoyd Right
Sir Norman Foster
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

and about any other architect who is remembered. being an architect means being a jack of all trades and aplying it to designing buildings.

Posted: 2003-11-01 07:46am
by Gandalf
salm wrote:
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:How many jack of all trades are remembered in history for their accomplishments? None.
Walter Gropius
Frank LLoyd Right
Sir Norman Foster
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

and about any other architect who is remembered. being an architect means being a jack of all trades and aplying it to designing buildings.
How many people know any of those people though, I've only heard of Flank Lloyd Wright because he was mentioned on The Simpsons.