Page 1 of 2
"Equilibrium" [Spoilers]
Posted: 2003-11-24 10:04am
by Warspite
Saw this last night. [Neo]Woah![/Neo]
The movie portrays a dystopian society in the future after a global war (a globe appears during the movie, showing the new face of Earth) where emotion (the cause of all evils of Mankind) is brutally quelched under the boots of repression, and where everyone has to take daily doses of a drug called "Prozium" in order not to feel any kind of emotion. Those that violate this rule are called sense offenders, and are properlly "processed", usually with a great amount of lead in their bodies, but there is also high pressurized fuel.
So, suspension of disbelief is the order of the day, as usual in all depictions of utopian/dystopian societies. Everyone wears the same type of garment and colour tone, cars are only for official authorities (police on airport firefighting vehicles and bikes, Clerics (enforcers) in non-descript white cars), apartements monasthical, indoctrination is present everywhere. In fact, one of the requirements for "suspension of disbelief" in this movie is for the characters to forget about the use of coverage of grenades, it seems nobody uses either method for room clearing in the future.
The main character is a Gramaton (sp) Cleric, the enforcers of "sense control", which during the movie will understand the existence of emotions (due to a small accident, he doesn't take his daily dose of Prozium, and forfeits anymore dosages), and ends up kicking ass, liberating humanity from the clutches of drug addiction (sorta).
During this process there is a lot of lead flying through the air, the writer/director inventing an interesting way for gunfights in the form of the martial art known as Gun-Kata, that is, lots of fancy moves with the bad guys getting killed. The coreography is incredible, and a lot of thought was put into it, the final battle between the bad guy and the hero being the best example.
Overall, the movie is great, it isn't as heavy (read, thought provoking) as 1984 or Brasil, the fight scenes are cleverly thought out with an excellent coreography, the editing and photography is good, and the special effects are top-notch, helping to tell the story instead of making the story.
Oh, yes, one final thing: Gun-Kata!
Posted: 2003-11-24 10:06am
by Oberleutnant
It rocks, doesn't it?
We've talked about it here on few occasions and it's really nice to see that more and more people see it. It received way too little attention when it came out, much less than it deserved. Thank God for the DVD.
Posted: 2003-11-24 10:57am
by Warspite
Yeah, I think it suffered from too many comparasions with the Matrix... When in fact, it has absolutely nothing similar to the Matrix, story-wise, or even FX-wise.
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:14am
by Admiral Valdemar
Christian Bale = 0wnage.
Pity Sean Bean carries on his tradition recently of dying very early on.
Posted: 2003-11-24 11:41am
by Zoink
Can you edit the title to put *SPOILER* in it?
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:01pm
by Warspite
@ Zoink: No problem!
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Christian Bale = 0wnage.
Pity Sean Bean carries on his tradition recently of dying very early on.
Yeah, what's up with that guy?
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:02pm
by Zac Naloen
i love this film
i hope kurt wimmer makes more films with the gun kata
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:08pm
by neoolong
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Christian Bale = 0wnage.
Pity Sean Bean carries on his tradition recently of dying very early on.
He didn't seem to reference that anything was sharpe though.
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:10pm
by Admiral Valdemar
neoolong wrote:Admiral Valdemar wrote:Christian Bale = 0wnage.
Pity Sean Bean carries on his tradition recently of dying very early on.
He didn't seem to reference that anything was sharpe though.
Bad pun.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:32pm
by ClaysGhost
I'm probably alone in thinking that the "still sharp" line that Sean Bean has in LoTR is a comedy classic.
Posted: 2003-11-24 12:58pm
by Sam Or I
I think it is in Sean Beans contract that he must have a cool death scene, in everyone of his movies.
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:07pm
by Admiral Valdemar
ClaysGhost wrote:I'm probably alone in thinking that the "still sharp" line that Sean Bean has in LoTR is a comedy classic.
It wasn't missed by me or my bro either.
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:26pm
by Tolya
I never watched the whole movie. Thanks to my friend (DivX on his comp) I only saw the fight/action sequences - and thats why I never want to see this movie again. Never ever. Fight scenes were so stupid, so lame, so unbelievably idiotic that I can't find proper words to describe it.
1) Elite regime guards? Goddamn soldier wanna-be's, wearing motorcycle helmets, shooting their G36 from hip and only hitting something when the screenplay tells them so. And the rebel assault on the end of the film? Damn, my english vocabulary is way to small to describe how stupid it was.
2) And the main character? Wow, Neo wouldnt have stood a chance against that guy. C'mon, he killed 6 elite superkatana guys (this is one of those films - if someone has a katana sword he must be a super cool ninja character) in a matter of seconds, and they were standing all around them. 3) Fight with that black guy? Took him 15 seconds to cut his face clean off...and it looked like he used a laser gun rather than a sword made of steel.
About the screenplay and overall idea behind this movie - well, Orwellian society - depicted pretty nicely, but I think I saw better...in other movies, older movies. This could have been a great film if they would have employed a decent fight choreographer who wouldnt force the main character to end every fight with some idiotic poses, like he's a model for Benetton.
This film suffers from Matrix syndrome - and people think they can make cash by ripping off someone's philosophy (Baudrillard in case of Matrix) or ideas (Orwell) and making some cool fight scenes. In Matrix (only in the first and the second part tho) fights were really good looking and cool. Equilibrium made me laugh. If you want to praise the philosophy this movie presents, then better read the real thing - 1984 by Orwell.
For me, the best film that touched the subject of controlling human lives was 13th Floor.
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:32pm
by Zac Naloen
This could have been a great film if they would have employed a decent fight choreographer who wouldnt force the main character to end every fight with some idiotic poses, like he's a model for Benetton.
you should really actually watch the film... then you wouldn't jump to stupid ass conclusions and come off sounding really stupid
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:34pm
by Admiral Valdemar
EmKay wrote:*SNIP*
So you're judging a movie you never saw? Ohhhkay...
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:43pm
by Sam Or I
EmKay wrote:I never watched the whole movie. Thanks to my friend (DivX on his comp) I only saw the fight/action sequences - and thats why I never want to see this movie again. Never ever. Fight scenes were so stupid, so lame, so unbelievably idiotic that I can't find proper words to describe it.
1) Elite regime guards? Goddamn soldier wanna-be's, wearing motorcycle helmets, shooting their G36 from hip and only hitting something when the screenplay tells them so. And the rebel assault on the end of the film? Damn, my english vocabulary is way to small to describe how stupid it was.
2) And the main character? Wow, Neo wouldnt have stood a chance against that guy. C'mon, he killed 6 elite superkatana guys (this is one of those films - if someone has a katana sword he must be a super cool ninja character) in a matter of seconds, and they were standing all around them. 3) Fight with that black guy? Took him 15 seconds to cut his face clean off...and it looked like he used a laser gun rather than a sword made of steel.
About the screenplay and overall idea behind this movie - well, Orwellian society - depicted pretty nicely, but I think I saw better...in other movies, older movies. This could have been a great film if they would have employed a decent fight choreographer who wouldnt force the main character to end every fight with some idiotic poses, like he's a model for Benetton.
This film suffers from Matrix syndrome - and people think they can make cash by ripping off someone's philosophy (Baudrillard in case of Matrix) or ideas (Orwell) and making some cool fight scenes. In Matrix (only in the first and the second part tho) fights were really good looking and cool. Equilibrium made me laugh. If you want to praise the philosophy this movie presents, then better read the real thing - 1984 by Orwell.
For me, the best film that touched the subject of controlling human lives was 13th Floor.
Watch the film as a whole first. then come back and talk.
Posted: 2003-11-24 01:59pm
by PeZook
I did watch the entire movie. The premise and story arc were moderately well done (for people with no emotions, everybody displayed a lot of them, like greed, satisfaction, contempt, anger...i expected a plot twist at the end, where it would become apparent that no one really took Prozium anymore, and the system just kept sustaining itself. Too bad it never came.). I absolutely can't agree with the majority about the fight scenes, though.
They were drawn out, boring and repetitive. The main character was standing still sorta waving his guns around while all the bad guys died, repeat ad nauseum. All right, if I suspend disbelief then perhaps I can subscribe to this entire "Gun-Kata" crap - too bad that when a fucking ANGRY MOB attacked the supposedly elite guards at the end, while waving their rifles around frantically and spraying on full-auto, the ultra-elite guards simply died without doing anything. It looked like a scene from Hot Shots 2.
Other than the stupid fight scenes, I have no real beef with "Equilibrium". If all the shooting and clubbing and maiming was SHORTER, it would even be watchable!
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:01pm
by Zac Naloen
They were drawn out, boring and repetitive.
um... the only long fight is the one at the end, the rest are less than 2 minutes long each...
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:12pm
by PeZook
Zac Naloen wrote:They were drawn out, boring and repetitive.
um... the only long fight is the one at the end, the rest are less than 2 minutes long each...
Are they? I've had an impression most of them lasted longer. It seems to be directly corellated with the amount of repetetiveness in every action scene.
For example, fina fight at Father's palace was pretty balanced. The ones where the cleric was just standing between some elite guards, clubbing them with pistol grips over and over and over and over and over, from different angles and with different zooms, or when he was dealing with guards in the main lobby of the palace (again...the main hero waves his guns around...once...twice...different angles, different zooms...oh, he does it a third time, too!) were agonizing.
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:14pm
by Tolya
-EDIT
I told you why I never watched the whole film. Action scenes threw me against the wall. And I was commenting about the things I have seen, in case you didnt notice. And I can pass judgements on that what I have seen. Note that Im not commenting on the other features of the movie, like screenplay, actors, music, scenes and special effects. Yes, I am commenting on something that I have seen partially. Anyone ever flew a real Mig29 fighter or took part in 1st World War? You can't really take opposite POV's well, don't you?
Actually I think I will watch the film - maybe Im wrong? I hardly think so. I'll post after I have seen it. Just for the sake of this thread and my own credibility.
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:38pm
by Death from the Sea
EmKay wrote:*SNIP*
For me, the best film that touched the subject of controlling human lives was 13th Floor.
Man was that movie boring, great concept for the movie, but the movie was slow and not done near as well as it could have been.
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:51pm
by Tolya
I disagree, it was a good example that a good movie can be made with 1/10 budget of the first Matrix. Too bad it never drew too much attention. No fancy fetish dresses, no fancy karate/kung fu fights made a nice difference after the first Matrix. Which one is better? I don't know, first matrix is also a great movie.
Posted: 2003-11-24 02:57pm
by Lord Pounder
Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups EmKay. Try watching the ENTIRE MOVIE before judging it. Sure you saw the action sequences but the movie explained why these things where happening. If you wanted mindless action get The Matrix Reloaded.
On another note Sean Bean has a very special agent. He either has lots of gratuitous sex (see Sharp) or he dies really nobely.
Posted: 2003-11-24 03:21pm
by Tolya
Oh, but in Matrix Reloaded everything was explained too *grin*. But yeah, it was basically loads of mindless action. As I said, I'll try and watch the movie.
Posted: 2003-11-24 03:31pm
by Sam Or I
IMHO the action was to brief. Yes it was over the top, but I found the action secondary to the story. The best part of the entire movie is John Prestons character development. For the plot and action I give it a B- , for being a charactor driven drama an A+.