War On War Toys
Posted: 2003-11-25 12:10am
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=34598
Be quiet don`t give them any ideas.neoolong wrote:I find it odd that Star Wars isn't on the list. Especially considering the violent nature of most of the characters that are released.
Why don't you dumbfucks shove a spoon up your collective ass and give kids some credit in figuring things out.This is yet another confusing story line for pre-schoolers who have enough fears of their own without adding imaginary ones.
I found it interesting that in their review of toys they often complained that toys were labled for ages below what the movies they were based on were labled. It seems to me that they are mixing things up to a certain degree. In some cases the age listings for toys have more to do with which age group of kids the toys are physically safe enough for and not whether the toy will mentally warp the kid for life.Lion & Lamb Project website wrote: Testimony
April 9, 2003
"There is a growing body of hard and verifiable evidence that suggests the violent and sexual content of entertainment media can be harmful to children's development," said Sen. Sam Brownback at a hearing on the Neurobiological Research and the Impact of Media. "Scientific research is clearly showing that watching violence makes people more violent – and not just at the time they watch the violence, that is, not just on the school yard as children, but years later, as adults. Many of us are already concerned about our society and our culture today – what happens when this generation grows up?" Additional testimony from this hearing is at http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/wit ... cfm?id=706
Funny that they don't even attempt to justify their claim that sex damages kidsTsyroc wrote:More crap from these people.![]()
I found it interesting that in their review of toys they often complained that toys were labled for ages below what the movies they were based on were labled. It seems to me that they are mixing things up to a certain degree. In some cases the age listings for toys have more to do with which age group of kids the toys are physically safe enough for and not whether the toy will mentally warp the kid for life.Lion & Lamb Project website wrote: Testimony
April 9, 2003
"There is a growing body of hard and verifiable evidence that suggests the violent and sexual content of entertainment media can be harmful to children's development," said Sen. Sam Brownback at a hearing on the Neurobiological Research and the Impact of Media. "Scientific research is clearly showing that watching violence makes people more violent – and not just at the time they watch the violence, that is, not just on the school yard as children, but years later, as adults. Many of us are already concerned about our society and our culture today – what happens when this generation grows up?" Additional testimony from this hearing is at http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/wit ... cfm?id=706
Also, just because a movie is PG-13 doesn't mean that no kids under 13 are going to see or enjoy the movie. The same goes for R rated movies and kids under 17. The ratings themself say stuff like "may not be appropriate for children under 13. The key word being "may".
Yeah, no kidding. I wonder if they ever heard of "Cop & robbers" and "Cowboys & Indians".....Gandalf wrote:If they ban the violent toys we'll just make our own. We used to just use metre long sticks and pretend they were rifles.
The second thing I learned is that children under the age of eight can not separate fact from fiction: That is why they believe in the Tooth Fairy, and worry about monsters under their beds. This is also the reason that children may not understand why it is acceptable for television characters to continually hit, kick and shoot each other -- but it is not acceptable for children to behave in this way on the playground.
About Transformers:What are the lessons that children learn from such "entertainment"? That violence and destruction are fun. That shooting doesn't kill ... or even hurt. That ruthless competition is a winning strategy.
The brand: This is another toy/TV program with a totally inappropriate story line for preschoolers. From the Razorclaw toy box: "In the distant future, the evil Unicron wages a final war for ultimate control of the Universe … As the enemy sides clash in the biggest war the Universe has ever seen, their bodies emit a powerful radiation known as Energon. Little do they know that Unicron is secretly harvesting this mysterious force to increase his own strength!" A tot prequel for The Matrix?
It actually looks blue when it's lit up.Gandalf wrote:I still have to ask, where did the black lightsabre come from?
I don't think there was an answer last time I asked.
Considering that nobody actually hit anybody with their guns, there really isn't that much to protest.DPDarkPrimus wrote:I remember a protest in the 80s about GI Joe and such.
Not that it did much.
Not to mention Yosemite Sam and his trigger happy ways with a six-shooter, and Elmer Fudd with his muzzle loading rifle, (brilliant examples of firearms safety there) and Wile E Coyote playing with dynamite, rockets, and improvised weapons. And throwing cats out of windows and beating animals with blunt objects was also a common occurence. Fact is there's few things more funny than senseless cartoon violence.Ghost Rider wrote:Times like these make me wonder how they came to be given that Looney Toons existed when they were children.
So I guess we should be looking at their generation to see if anyone is dropping Anvils on each other...damn the stupidity.
Case in point: Itchy and Scratchy.aerius wrote:Not to mention Yosemite Sam and his trigger happy ways with a six-shooter, and Elmer Fudd with his muzzle loading rifle, (brilliant examples of firearms safety there) and Wile E Coyote playing with dynamite, rockets, and improvised weapons. And throwing cats out of windows and beating animals with blunt objects was also a common occurence. Fact is there's few things more funny than senseless cartoon violence.Ghost Rider wrote:Times like these make me wonder how they came to be given that Looney Toons existed when they were children.
So I guess we should be looking at their generation to see if anyone is dropping Anvils on each other...damn the stupidity.
Although you must admit that when you were a kid, you too wondered just what kind of things you could really order from ACME.aerius wrote:Not to mention Yosemite Sam and his trigger happy ways with a six-shooter, and Elmer Fudd with his muzzle loading rifle, (brilliant examples of firearms safety there) and Wile E Coyote playing with dynamite, rockets, and improvised weapons. And throwing cats out of windows and beating animals with blunt objects was also a common occurence. Fact is there's few things more funny than senseless cartoon violence.