Page 1 of 2
Invite a Philosopher to SD.Net
Posted: 2004-01-21 04:08pm
by SyntaxVorlon
If you had your pick of all philosophers who ever lived, which one would you find most suited for an account on SD.Net?
I personally would invite Wittgenstein, mostly because of his intense knowledge of logic, his interesting viewpoints on art, culture and religion, and his skeptical view of the world in general. And I am most certain that he would fit in nicely, though he may at some point be labeled an attention whore.
Posted: 2004-01-21 04:12pm
by El Moose Monstero
I fear Wittegenstien wouldnt last long, as he'd probably get sick of the drunken python song references being trotted out every time he got on someones nerves...
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Posted: 2004-01-21 04:12pm
by Admiral Valdemar
The Wachowskis so I can observe so many varieties of flamefest.
Posted: 2004-01-21 04:18pm
by General Zod
Nietzsche might be fun to have on here. either him or Machiavelli, one of my personal favorites.
Posted: 2004-01-21 06:50pm
by Alyrium Denryle
Locke would be great in N&P...
Posted: 2004-01-21 06:54pm
by SirNitram
Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
Posted: 2004-01-21 06:55pm
by Dahak
I'd like to see Hobbes.
Leviathan is just a classic.
Kant might be interesting, too.
And Any Rand, just for flaming fun
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:12pm
by Howedar
I agree with Locke.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:22pm
by Rye
Bertrand Russel would be cool.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:27pm
by DPDarkPrimus
Admiral Valdemar wrote:The Wachowskis so I can observe so many varieties of flamefest.
You are implying that they are philosophers. DIE!
![Kill them all! :kill:](./images/smilies/kill.gif)
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:34pm
by Alyrium Denryle
SirNitram wrote:Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
Aistotle would be interesting.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:35pm
by Rye
Alyrium Denryle wrote:SirNitram wrote:Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
Aristotle would be interesting.
Aye, he'd probably be a bit shocked with female equality though.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:37pm
by Alyrium Denryle
Probably, but then again he would have no problem with the scientific rationalists here, and would love to see his logic put to good use.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:48pm
by Durandal
SirNitram wrote:Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
I can just imagine Mike calling Socrates a fucking shitstain.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:51pm
by Alyrium Denryle
I can imagine the mike banning him for trolling
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Calling socrates on logical fallacies would kick so much ass.
Posted: 2004-01-21 07:51pm
by haas mark
Durandal wrote:SirNitram wrote:Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
I can just imagine Mike calling Socrates a fucking shitstain.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
ROFL..
I wonder which one, though, would be least shocked by the continuous references to anal sex, masturbation, toys, fetishes and the like?
~ver
Posted: 2004-01-21 08:01pm
by Mayabird
Thomas Paine would probably fit in pretty well.
Posted: 2004-01-21 08:16pm
by Mr Bean
Carl Marx would be fun in S&L
Posted: 2004-01-21 08:57pm
by Rogue 9
Mr Bean wrote:Carl Marx would be fun in S&L
Yes, so we could break out the flamethrowers and flame him massively.
Posted: 2004-01-21 09:20pm
by General Zod
at least nobody's suggested ayn rand yet. *flee*
Posted: 2004-01-21 09:30pm
by SirNitram
verilon wrote:Durandal wrote:SirNitram wrote:Socrates would rock. He'd probably cause endless flamewars with the empiricists here, but it'd be great to watch.
I can just imagine Mike calling Socrates a fucking shitstain.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
ROFL..
I wonder which one, though, would be least shocked by the continuous references to anal sex, masturbation, toys, fetishes and the like?
Socrates, probably. They were pretty open about that stuff back then.
Posted: 2004-01-21 09:41pm
by SeebianWurm
Was Descartes the one that said he could concieve of something perfect, therefore it exists?
If so, I choose him.
Posted: 2004-01-21 09:51pm
by haas mark
SirNitram wrote:Socrates, probably. They were pretty open about that stuff back then.
Probably true there.. wonder if he could handle how in depth it's all discussed, though..
~ver
Posted: 2004-01-21 09:58pm
by The Aliens
Emmanuel Kant wrote 'The logic of Pure Reason", correct? He'd be interesting to have around.
Posted: 2004-01-22 06:13am
by Dahak
Darth_Zod wrote:at least nobody's suggested ayn rand yet. *flee*
*points to a post above*
I did
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Just for flaming purposes, of course
And for nitpicking of the day:
It is:
Karl Marx and
Immanuel Kant, and he wrote "Critique of Practical Reason" (Kritik der reinen Vernunft)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)