StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Find out! SD.net rates at 88% evil, 12% good.

Been posted before, I believe. MR = 99% good.

All short phrases come out as 99% good. All my Internet aliases came out as 99% good. You need to rate a long ass string of words before it does anything else.

Mine is 31% evil, 69% good. 69 is considered a good number by lots of people.

Ah, ok, well, most of the Moose Rebellion text (a good seventeen thousand words or so) comes out at 34% evil.

Well, I take it back. Apparently Diet Coke comes out as 50% evil.

Did you do the website? Because according to it, the BBS itself (bbs.stardestroyer.net) is only 37% evil.

I did the website. I also just got back from doing the BBS and it came to 40% evil for me. Must have been some evil posts made between our two testing times. And it won't rate EZBoards for some reason.

LOL, www . drdino . com is 71% evil, 29% good, and DITL is 67% evil and 33% good.

Hehehe, the website to my shooting club is 62% evil, 38% good, whilst my homepage is 52% evil, 48% good.

Weird...there's nothing 'bad' about either site.

My site only rates a 48%. I feel a bit pissed. Maybe I should go kick a couple of puppies to raise the rating.

It's a worthless calculator, since Luke Skywalker is 99% evil, 1% good, and Darth Vader is the exact opposite.

DPDarkPrimus wrote:It's a worthless calculator, since Luke Skywalker is 99% evil, 1% good, and Darth Vader is the exact opposite.

Well, yeah. Its using numerology and Luke's name has 13 letters. That'll do it under they're system.

Of course its worthless, but its fun!

But I thought Lord Vader was a great man?!

There's something wrong with this thing... it rates CJ at 11% evil.

CJ is WAAAAY more evil than that.

My website is 11% evil, 89% good.

Given the test criteria, this is unsurprising. Marathon is peppered with references to the number 7, which determines the goodness of a website.

My website (don't ask) is 64% evil, 36% good.