StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Behold...

THE PATRICAUST!

It's all a big feminist conspiracy or something.

There's a mens movement?

Do they burn jockstraps or underwear?

However, if it should come to the point that men, too, have to wear a cloth patch to mark them, it could well be designed to look like the one shown above.

I think men already have a mark like that. It's called a penis.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:

However, if it should come to the point that men, too, have to wear a cloth patch to mark them, it could well be designed to look like the one shown above.

I think men already have a mark like that. It's called a penis.

If we walked around naked that might help.

Well that was. . .interesting. While I will admit that I have seen men discriminated against in some ways, I don't really feel it was done in the spirit of the "patricaust" as that site claims. In the cases I have seen it happen, the offender was simply so afraid of appearing to discriminate against women that they discriminated in women's favor instead.

Hmmmm.... the SOS haven't posted any denials yet. I wonder.

SyntaxVorlon wrote:Hmmmm.... the SOS haven't posted any denials yet. I wonder.

Give them time, perhaps they're plaaning the best way to assault this thread.

What a crackpot.

I especially love the bit about women controlling the military. Isn't it still overwhemlingly male?

Stormbringer wrote:What a crackpot.

I especially love the bit about women controlling the military. Isn't it still overwhemlingly male?

THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK!!!

This isn't just insane, it's disgustingly hypocritical. If there's any mass-murder based on sex going on, it's of women, since selective abortion based on sex and quite possibly exposure of female infants as well is quite commonplace in some third-world and developing countries, leading to huge imbalances between men and women like the one in China; where there is an excess of men that will sooner be greater than the combined populations of several surrounding countries.

Stormbringer wrote:What a crackpot.

I especially love the bit about women controlling the military. Isn't it still overwhemlingly male?

LESBIANS!! THEY'RE ALL MUSCLY, BULGING, TESTOSTERONE .. filled.. hot.. sexy .. lesbians..

This reminds me a little too much of that ASVS post someone showed me by the 'pro-rapist'.

Ugh, the rest of that site makes me retch.

The real leaders of the movement are female-homosexuals. Their militarism make them extremists: they want to push their anti-male and pro-homosexuality on all females, starting in grade schools. There seems to be a deep hatred or fear of males in them.
In reality the word 'homosexual' is self-contradictory. Sexual behavior can only happen between two biologically different (dyadic) but complimentary individuals, not two similar individuals. The extremists of radical feminism are really HeteroPhobics, not homosexuals. They hate, fear, or despise males.

(emphasis mine)

InnerBrat wrote:Ugh, the rest of that site makes me retch.

The real leaders of the movement are female-homosexuals. Their militarism make them extremists: they want to push their anti-male and pro-homosexuality on all females, starting in grade schools. There seems to be a deep hatred or fear of males in them.
In reality the word 'homosexual' is self-contradictory. Sexual behavior can only happen between two biologically different (dyadic) but complimentary individuals, not two similar individuals. The extremists of radical feminism are really HeteroPhobics, not homosexuals. They hate, fear, or despise males.

(emphasis mine)

There comes a point when stoicism is the only possible response to that madness. Anyone who tries to compare possible systemic injustices in the USA's child support and child custody systems with the holocaust is simply insane, a tinfoil hat wearer, and their words can, however closely barbed and however vicious, slide off relatively easily, or at least so I first personally. A different story from people who have real influence, because you know that others will listen to them--and that's disturbing.

Y'know, that article actually started out interesting but at some point it veered off into the same territory as David Icke's claim about Kris Kristofferson being a space alien.

megamoron wrote:The total of all men and boys in the world alive
in the year 2000 falls short by 278 million.

erm... is he saying that in the year 2000 were only 278 million men or that by 2000 there would be 278 million less men?

Everybody knows that behind every great man is a woman pulling his strings.

He's saying there's 278 million less men than there should be, though where he pulled those numbers from I have no idea..though his ass would be a good place to start. How can one even know how many men there should be? Goddamn the guy's a fruitcake. I thought it was a parody site at first but after the 1st page or 2 he sounds like a complete fruitloop.

I'm almost entirely sure that that page is a joke guys. Simmah down.

Hmm nice idea, I would not mind if there was ten women for every man

You sure this isn't a joke, like the chicken holocaust stuff?

Cherchez la femme!