Will Islam survive the next few centuries?
Posted: 2002-10-16 10:16am
http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/10 ... index.html
I'm sorry to say this, but I sincerely hope not.
I'm sorry to say this, but I sincerely hope not.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4062
Especially when the majority of these people are poor, uneducated and isolated from the rest of the world.Stravo wrote:What everyone fails to come to terms with (perhaps intentionally) is that Islam has the most practiioners of any reliigons...A BILLION followers I beleive from PBS' documentary on Islam. The middle East and alot of the near east and southeast asia. That's alot of followers and you cannot ignore that. I can't beleive that a few centuries down the road such a vast follower base will simply disappear.
Guess that I should have actually read all your post before I repeated what you said!Stravo wrote:We may not like it (particularly when it comes to Fundamentalist Islam) but it is a fact. Other religions may fade away (doubtful) but Islam will still be going strong just by the fact that in the nations where Islam is strongest, you will always have a poor struggling underclass that is willing to accept the vision of this religion. Like most major religions Islam is most popular with those who are struggling and have little hope...why? because as much as you hate religion there is one thing it provides that makes it self perpetuatiing..that's hope. A false hope to be sure for many but hope nonetheless.
What?Dark Primus wrote:"SWEDEN: Two dead, the hospital said"
And 15 are missing from what i have heard.
Islam is popular among the poor and ignorant because it's s religion of hate rather than hope. Islam is popular among the likes of arabs and US blacks because it gives them someone to blame for their own plight. Islam provides a ready path for these people to channel their resentment not at eachother for failing to create decent lives and societies but rather at the Christian and Jewish infidels. It gives them someone else to blame.Stravo wrote:Like most major religions Islam is most popular with those who are struggling and have little hope...why? because as much as you hate religion there is one thing it provides that makes it self perpetuatiing..that's hope. A false hope to be sure for many but hope nonetheless.
The extremist sects are the fastest growing branches of the I-explode-for-Allah religion. It's the moderates who are dying out.Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:I'm quite sure the extremists will die out, but the religion will survive.
I'd rather see that, than the death of Religion. I just think it's sort of a cop out when ppl blame Religion for molding intolerance in the world, when it is quite the opposite in my opinion. Its what humans alway have done and will continue to do, even if religion never existed, because it's Human nature.Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:I'm quite sure the extremists will die out, but the religion will survive.
No, Man will think he needs religion, because religion claims to have the answers. The fact that its answers are just plucked out of thin air is its dirty little secret, and Man tries to ignore that.MattTheSkywalker wrote:Islam at approx 1400 years old is similar to Christianity at the same age: Embraced by the poor, sued by the powerful to subjugate people and direct hate elsewhere, etc.
As long as there are unanswered questions, man will need religion.
Almost every philosophical or secular system of morality says the same thing, with no superstitious baggage attached.THe Yosemite Bear wrote:ahh., but, sense of wonder, and loose all touch with the defining characteristics of our cultures that would be a BAD thing. Now let's face it. Almost every religion tells people to be good to each other, and be respectful of your fellow humans. These are basicly Good Things.
Yes, because it's a false dilemma; no one said that the removal of religion would cause instant utopia; we only implied that it would probably improve the situation. Those other motivations you spoke of would still exist, but if you take, say, 3 motivations for hate and intolerance and cut them down to 2, that is an improvement, is it not?It is not the belief in God that fucks this up, it's politics using religion as an excuse for Expansion and conquest. If they didn't have religion, they can commit atrocities in the name of State, Nationalism, "Race" etc.
Anyone want to argue with that?
I don't see any laws of physics being broken there, so I don't see why you must invoke the divine in order to explain what I would describe as a few lucky breaks mixed in with some bad ones (for example, was it a miracle that you survived some nutcase going postal, or was it shit luck that you were in the vicinity of some nutcase going postal in the first place?).THe Yosemite Bear wrote:I do believe (Irrationally) in some force I can not explain, because I have survived a number of things that for all purposes I really shouldn't have survived. Now childhood abuse, and international injustice caused me to embrace Existentialism, and Nilism when I was in High School (Fuck who didn't) however my return to spirituality, came as a result of huddling under a desk waiting for some idiot was shooting at my fellow Civil Service employees. At some point I counted how many times I should have died (Drunk driving parents, abuse, a sudden wind change on a fire, the fact that Kevin People's pistol jammed, etc. I could find no rational explanation for what happened. in any of those cases.)
"Excellent"? I beg to differ; most of those legends are rather hateful, intolerant, and war-mongering. They're typical of a civilization which has not yet grown up, and they're certainly not suitable for children. If someone made a movie with anywhere near as much violence and cruelty as the Bible and it did not have a religious basis, the MPAA would slap an NC-17 on it and all of the religious "family values" people would use it as an example of what's wrong with society today.I under stand that the moral rules apply, be it Religion, law, other forms of Philosphy Growing up with liberal Jewish and Catholic parents, I was encouraged to question authority. And I have. The hatred expressed by the fundamentalists is an inability to take a work created in Prose for oral tradition, and then taking a POLITICALLY MOTIVATED translation, that deletes many key passages at face value. The Talmud, Bible, Koran, and Bagata-Divita are excellent cultural epics, full of exactly the same legends that makes Cu-Culan, the Iliad and The Stories of Anchient Egypt.
Actually, most forms of organized religion encourage irrational thought. Irrational thought is behind a vast number of crimes and social problems.I don't think there is any thing wrong with religion or with any other philosphy.
Religion does not exist only for strife, but it deliberately engenders irrational thought, and certain specific religions (ie- Islam, Judaism, and Christianity) do explicitly encourage strife in their respective "holy books".They provide a nice basic set of rules, that provided people were to look at their simularities not their differences. The whole belief that Religon is a force existing only for strife is just as ludacrise. (Yes I know my spelling is awful. That is one of my neurological quirks)