StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Well, was he? I hope not, He's excellent cannon fodder for us logical straight thinkers.

THEHOOLIGANJEDI wrote:Well, was he? I hope not, He's excellent cannon fodder for us logical straight thinkers.

He asked to be banned after Lord Wong relegated him to the HOS, partially because he started being obnoxious to Kelly

Well, if he asked ot be banned, I don't think he'll be coming back. He brought it on himself.

If he showed up again, I would ban him on the spot. The fucker sent those elitefitness trolls after us.

Now that is an intersting bit of information. Well, if anyone wants to exact revenge, seek punishment, or simply wants to imitate the actions of a tyrannical warlord such as myself, I say we allow him back onto the boards. Let him get in a few arrogant posts then bash the hell out of him. If you want to go any furthur start bombing his email address.

Darth Wong wrote:If he showed up again, I would ban him on the spot. The fucker sent those elitefitness trolls after us.

Do you know that for a fact? What I mean is how did you get that information out of the relative parties concerned? I can't imagine anyone of them would admit it.

Crown wrote:

Darth Wong wrote:If he showed up again, I would ban him on the spot. The fucker sent those elitefitness trolls after us.

Do you know that for a fact? What I mean is how did you get that information out of the relative parties concerned? I can't imagine anyone of them would admit it.

The day after he leaves, somebody shows up on Elitefitness and tells them to go after a bunch of "hypersensitive communists" at bbs.stardestroyer.net. If that doesn't sound like Azeron, I don't know what does.

Not that I am a lawer but a little circumspect eh? Mind you it could have been any number of our past 'posters', Arminius etc. Oh well the board held together and that's all that matters.

Fucking fascists. I hope those elite fitness faggots assrape him.

Crown wrote:Not that I am a lawer but a little circumspect eh?

True, it is only circumstantial evidence (very strong circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence nonetheless). But this is not a court of law, and he's not being put in prison. There is no uneven burden of proof, and no deliberate weighting of the decision-making process in the defendant's favour. If we must choose the most likely conclusion instead of being asked to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, then I'd say yes, he obviously did it.

Darth Wong wrote: True, it is only circumstantial evidence (very strong circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence nonetheless). But this is not a court of law, and he's not being put in prison. There is no uneven burden of proof, and no deliberate weighting of the decision-making process in the defendant's favour. If we must choose the most likely conclusion instead of being asked to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, then I'd say yes, he obviously did it.

I don't remember and now they've closed the forum, but how many posts the guy who pointed to us had? If he's a newbie, then it would point more to Azeron, or someone with a grudge against us.

If he's not a newbie, then it's simple. Check out his other posts. Azeron's opinions are.. easily identifiable..

I never got an account, but GAT or somebody else could check it out with ease, if they didn't get banned.