Kerry proposes new CV Class
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:26pm
StarDestroyer.Net BBS
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
Kerry proposes new CV Class
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=46497
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:31pm
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:32pm
Shep, is this threat in any way somehow constructive, or is that simply a "useless-thread"? Apart from shitting on Kerry, this threat is brainless, and even the humor is not so great.
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:38pm
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:42pm
True story, I was typing in this thread, and I've been up for 22 hours
straight now, and I was reading a story on McCain
and I typed in McCain proposes a new CV class and posted it before
realizing my error. I edited it to Kerry right away
straight now, and I was reading a story on McCain
and I typed in McCain proposes a new CV class and posted it before
realizing my error. I edited it to Kerry right away
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:52pm
Bush responds by allocating 500 billion dollars to converting this into a dedicated US aircraft carrier.
Posted: 2004-06-02 03:59pm
Uh oh, Shep. Looks like a moderator isn't happy with--oh, wait a minute.Tribun wrote:Shep, is this threat in any way somehow constructive, or is that simply a "useless-thread"? Apart from shitting on Kerry, this threat is brainless, and even the humor is not so great.
Posted: 2004-06-02 04:19pm
What a whiny little bitch. Good God.Tribun wrote:Shep, is this threat in any way somehow constructive, or is that simply a "useless-thread"? Apart from shitting on Kerry, this threat is brainless, and even the humor is not so great.
Posted: 2004-06-02 04:22pm
I...um...I don't get it.
Posted: 2004-06-02 04:24pm
It's meant to be an aircraft carrier but, hilariously, it's so ickle that not even Italy would buy it.HemlockGrey wrote:I...um...I don't get it.
Posted: 2004-06-02 04:28pm
Change Italy to "Royal Navy" and it's more accurate 
Posted: 2004-06-02 04:38pm
Pfft, 3 ASW carriers is enough for now anyway, we don't need a carrier force when the USN has theirs going around blowing shit up free of charge.MKSheppard wrote:Change Italy to "Royal Navy" and it's more accurate
I actually like the Giuseppe Garibaldi to be honest.
Posted: 2004-06-02 06:57pm
Well, the IDF packed a heilcopter and hanger onto a missile boat that only displaced a couple hundred tons. Escort such craft with Streetfighter and we have the basis for the worst naval force ever created.
Posted: 2004-06-02 07:17pm
Hahahahahaaa!!! 
It would be so like Kerry.
It would be so like Kerry.
Posted: 2004-06-02 08:21pm
hehe Shep you are funny despite yourself.
Posted: 2004-06-02 08:53pm
That is funnier than hell!
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
*gasp for breath*
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Posted: 2004-06-02 09:06pm
Well at least it's not as bad as Bush landing on the aircraft carrier - I almost threw up when I saw that jackass... 
Posted: 2004-06-02 09:29pm
But it could be useful for the Quebec Separatists NavyAdmiral Valdemar wrote:It's meant to be an aircraft carrier but, hilariously, it's so ickle that not even Italy would buy it.HemlockGrey wrote:I...um...I don't get it.
Posted: 2004-06-02 09:39pm
I name the carrier: JB Burgles
Posted: 2004-06-02 09:44pm
Haha, thats funny Shep. I'm still voting for Kerry though.
You know what's cool, that is San Francisco Bay. From the angle it looks like they are near or at the former Alameda NAS. Do you know when that pic was taken?
You know what's cool, that is San Francisco Bay. From the angle it looks like they are near or at the former Alameda NAS. Do you know when that pic was taken?
Posted: 2004-06-02 11:51pm
Nuclear wessels!TrailerParkJawa wrote:Alameda
Posted: 2004-06-02 11:55pm
TrailerParkJawa wrote:Haha, thats funny Shep. I'm still voting for Kerry though.
You know what's cool, that is San Francisco Bay. From the angle it looks like they are near or at the former Alameda NAS. Do you know when that pic was taken?
You sure? It looks like SD to me.
Posted: 2004-06-03 12:27am
So anyone know why the plane was on that thing anyway? 
And Montcalm, that QSN is pretty tricksy....Thank God for the Canadian Shadow Military for keeping things under control.
And Montcalm, that QSN is pretty tricksy....Thank God for the Canadian Shadow Military for keeping things under control.
Posted: 2004-06-03 12:47am
Look at the left side of the picture in the background and you can see Sutro Tower on the hills. It is a big radio/tv attenae for the area.Lonestar wrote:TrailerParkJawa wrote:Haha, thats funny Shep. I'm still voting for Kerry though.
You know what's cool, that is San Francisco Bay. From the angle it looks like they are near or at the former Alameda NAS. Do you know when that pic was taken?
You sure? It looks like SD to me.
Posted: 2004-06-03 03:43am
It might prove of some use if VSTOL aircraft are used.Admiral Valdemar wrote:It's meant to be an aircraft carrier but, hilariously, it's so ickle that not even Italy would buy it.HemlockGrey wrote:I...um...I don't get it.