Would you like SD.net updated more often?

Nova Andromeda · Post by **Nova Andromeda** » 2002-11-24 01:11pm

--Since this board came online there has been a tragic decline in updates to the rest of SD.net. The creation site has not been updated since March and the Star Wars vs. Star Trek site has not been updated since Oct. 19.
-Personally, I would like to see the poll updated every other week and the other two sites updated every one to two months. I'd be willing to help by proof reading stuff, doing research, finding poll questions, etc.

[EDIT]Added no updates option (Duh!).[/EDIT]

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-11-24 01:14pm

I don't know would I like free money? Yes I would silly Nova of course we want more updates

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2002-11-24 01:15pm

I say let Mike do it when he wants. The problem is once there's only so much to add. Other than the various canon databases (and those are a long term project) there isn't much more to add until the new movies come out. I suppose work some of the Nemisis and Attack of the Clones material.

Aside from the poll, the question for it at least could be left board members, there's not much he needs to upodate.

Tosho · Post by **Tosho** » 2002-11-24 01:17pm

In my opinion the best part of sd.net is the creationism vs. science site, in other words I'd like more updates for that part of sd.net

Pablo Sanchez · Post by **Pablo Sanchez** » 2002-11-24 01:18pm

It's Mike's prerogative. The Creationism site appears mostly complete, anyway. The Vs. site appears to be getting updates fairly soon, anyway.

Tosho · Post by **Tosho** » 2002-11-24 01:28pm

Pablo Sanchez wrote:It's Mike's prerogative. The Creationism site appears mostly complete, anyway. The Vs. site appears to be getting updates fairly soon, anyway.

True, but as long as the science curriculum in many nations in needs a massive overhaul creationists will keep making up even more "creative" bullshit. Hense the need to find and destroy their brand new arguments.

Hell, they'll keep making moronic arguments even if we overhaul the science curriculum.

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2002-11-24 01:47pm

Tosho wrote:
Pablo Sanchez wrote:It's Mike's prerogative. The Creationism site appears mostly complete, anyway. The Vs. site appears to be getting updates fairly soon, anyway.
True, but as long as the science curriculum in many nations in needs a massive overhaul creationists will keep making up even more "creative" bullshit. Hense the need to find and destroy their brand new arguments.

Hell, they'll keep making moronic arguments even if we overhaul the science curriculum.

Except they haven't produced any new arguements just subtle variations of the old ones. Look at all the fundies smited here and on his hating mail page. Only if there's a new and compelling need to whack a fundy should he really bother.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2002-11-24 01:52pm

I'd like to see both web sites to get more updates--especially the Creation web site that hasn't been updated since March. If Wong feels it's pretty much complete he could get out articles he finds that are full of shit that is happening today and offer arguments to it.

Tosho · Post by **Tosho** » 2002-11-24 01:54pm

Stormbringer wrote:
Tosho wrote:
Pablo Sanchez wrote:It's Mike's prerogative. The Creationism site appears mostly complete, anyway. The Vs. site appears to be getting updates fairly soon, anyway.
True, but as long as the science curriculum in many nations in needs a massive overhaul creationists will keep making up even more "creative" bullshit. Hense the need to find and destroy their brand new arguments.

Hell, they'll keep making moronic arguments even if we overhaul the science curriculum.
Except they haven't produced any new arguements just subtle variations of the old ones. Look at all the fundies smited here and on his hating mail page. Only if there's a new and compelling need to whack a fundy should he really bother.

Hmm... I grudgingly concede.

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2002-11-24 01:57pm

I would like to see the Vs site expanded to other universes besides ST, but I doubt Mike has time for that.

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2002-11-24 02:01pm

Cyril wrote:I would like to see the Vs site expanded to other universes besides ST, but I doubt Mike has time for that.

And he has no iclination. It's answered in the FAQ why he doesn't do that.

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2002-11-24 02:24pm

We'll the site need a massive overhaul thanks to ICS, but that will happen when Wong wants it to happen. By the same card, ICS, he doesn’t really need to update, one can jut quote pages of it.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-11-24 02:28pm

I would, of course, like to see the site updated more frequently, but I also recognize that that is simply not possible. Mike, like many other people, has many demands placed on his time. After a point, hobbies like this one are sacrificed so that more important issues can be dealt with. It would be nice if the site was updated more often, but we can't expect Mike to sacrifice his family for his website.

Nova Andromeda · Post by **Nova Andromeda** » 2002-11-24 02:30pm

--Well I was thinking a robust logical fallacies (logic in general) page would be a good addition to the creation site. Most of the components are there, but they are scattered and there is not one spot where people are "schooled" in logic.
-I would also like to see more battles in the Vs. site plus regular updates of the Imperial Poll.
-However, I put the Darth Wong veto in the poll for a reason. Darth Wong may have neither the time, the desire, or want others to add to his site.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-11-24 02:38pm

The vs. site needs a big update.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-11-24 03:38pm

If Mike has the time, he should add more to the Creationism vs. Science site, and some more content to the SW vs. ST section. I'd like to see more essays, more on science and debating fallacies, the OT violence page completed, and something like a history of sci-fi debating.

Ted · Post by **Ted** » 2002-11-24 04:02pm

I think he should institue a new poll, as this current one is pretty old.

And some updates to the site would be nice, but whenever Mike has time is fine by me.

Crazy_Vasey · Post by **Crazy_Vasey** » 2002-11-24 04:09pm

What's the point? Star Wars has effectively won with the advent of ICS.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2002-11-24 04:17pm

Update when Nemesis and SW3 come out....

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-11-24 04:24pm

Crazy_Vasey wrote:What's the point? Star Wars has effectively won with the advent of ICS.

But did it win everything? By how much has it won?

Crazy_Vasey · Post by **Crazy_Vasey** » 2002-11-24 04:54pm

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Crazy_Vasey wrote:What's the point? Star Wars has effectively won with the advent of ICS.

But did it win everything? By how much has it won?

Considering that by ICS a clone wars era troop transport is worth the entire federation fleet at least I'd say in military terms Star Wars has it sewn up in just about every single possible category.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2002-11-24 07:21pm

Yeah, there won't be no major offensive from the trekkies till nemesis comes out and they try to find something in that to support their delusion that the Federation could defeat the Empire.

Nova Andromeda · Post by **Nova Andromeda** » 2002-11-24 08:40pm

--I wonder, do people think that voting as if they were Darth Wong accomplishes anything? It only forces Darth Wong to post in this thread to clarify that he actually vetoed the poll (assumming he even cares).
-Perhaps they get off by fantasizing they were Darth Wong???

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2002-11-24 08:49pm

I'd like to see some more stuff in the Star Trek Canon Database, lately I've been looking for some S.8472 info, and their isn't much their.

GrandMasterTerwynn · Post by **GrandMasterTerwynn** » 2002-11-25 01:56am

Nova Andromeda wrote:--Since this board came online there has been a tragic decline in updates to the rest of SD.net. The creation site has not been updated since March and the Star Wars vs. Star Trek site has not been updated since Oct. 19.
-Personally, I would like to see the poll updated every other week and the other two sites updated every one to two months. I'd be willing to help by proof reading stuff, doing research, finding poll questions, etc.

[EDIT]Added no updates option (Duh!).[/EDIT]

Yeah, I suppose if we want the site updated more often we could be volunteering to help out with stuff, like the canon database.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Would you like SD.net updated more often?

What would you like to see.

Would you like SD.net updated more often?

Re: Would you like SD.net updated more often?