A series of questions
Posted: 2002-12-01 02:49am
I first posted this in the HOS but decided to move here.
1. What would a single 200GT blast do to a planet?
1. What would a single 200GT blast do to a planet?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7095
Hyperion wrote:that's one question, not a series of questions.
neoolong wrote:Carve out a huge chunk of rock. Can't you use the asteriod calculator thing for this?
Doing a quick and dirty calc. using that calculator I got 58480m. diameter gets you a 200 gigaton fragmentation energy. I don't know if that is how you use it though.Shinova wrote:neoolong wrote:Carve out a huge chunk of rock. Can't you use the asteriod calculator thing for this?
You talking about the one on sd.net? That offers an input value of diameter. Or are you supposed to play around with that until a figure of 200GT shows up in one of the calculated values?
a) Make a big hole in the ground.Shinova wrote:I first posted this in the HOS but decided to move here.
1. What would a single 200GT blast do to a planet?
Look on the "Planet Killers" portion of the "Essays" page. First one is for a large asteroid. While not exactly equivalent to a turbolaser, a 10^5 MT asteroid should give you a pretty good approximation of what will happen.Shinova wrote:neoolong wrote:Carve out a huge chunk of rock. Can't you use the asteriod calculator thing for this?
You talking about the one on sd.net? That offers an input value of diameter. Or are you supposed to play around with that until a figure of 200GT shows up in one of the calculated values?
Don't you mean astronomically.C.S.Strowbridge wrote:Not that much Astrologically speaking.
Big earthquake (9.1). although, not the biggest recorded.
Big crater (18 km), although not the biggest found. Gosses Bluff, Australia has a bigger one.
The Earth has big hit by thousands of asteroids with bigger impacts.
So while the locals aren't going to like it, globally there's little to concern yourself with.
It would need to be about 40 times more powerful before you need to pack you bags and find a new planet.
No, he mans astrologiaclly. After all, a 200 GT blast could make your horiscope even more inaccurate than it already is.neoolong wrote:Don't you mean astronomically.C.S.Strowbridge wrote:Not that much Astrologically speaking.
Big earthquake (9.1). although, not the biggest recorded.
Big crater (18 km), although not the biggest found. Gosses Bluff, Australia has a bigger one.
The Earth has big hit by thousands of asteroids with bigger impacts.
So while the locals aren't going to like it, globally there's little to concern yourself with.
It would need to be about 40 times more powerful before you need to pack you bags and find a new planet.
Oops. At least you know what I meant.neoolong wrote:Don't you mean astronomically.C.S.Strowbridge wrote:Not that much Astrologically speaking.
Big earthquake (9.1). although, not the biggest recorded.
Big crater (18 km), although not the biggest found. Gosses Bluff, Australia has a bigger one.
The Earth has big hit by thousands of asteroids with bigger impacts.
So while the locals aren't going to like it, globally there's little to concern yourself with.
It would need to be about 40 times more powerful before you need to pack you bags and find a new planet.
Not really. if your horoscope said "Today is a bad day for you. Basically you're fucked." And a 200 GT hit blew up your city, that would be a pretty accurate prediction, no?data_link wrote:
No, he mans astrologiaclly. After all, a 200 GT blast could make your horiscope even more inaccurate than it already is.
But your horiscope would more likely be, 'Today is a good day for business. Look out for the beginnings of a new romantic relationship with a Virgo, or possibly a Tarus. Travel is in your future!'Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Not really. if your horoscope said "Today is a bad day for you. Basically you're fucked." And a 200 GT hit blew up your city, that would be a pretty accurate prediction, no?data_link wrote:
No, he mans astrologiaclly. After all, a 200 GT blast could make your horiscope even more inaccurate than it already is.
Yeah. They're always vague about such things. Although the last part is somewhat correct. YOu're on a one way trip.C.S.Strowbridge wrote:
But your horiscope would more likely be, 'Today is a good day for business. Look out for the beginnings of a new romantic relationship with a Virgo, or possibly a Tarus. Travel is in your future!'
Probably.And the Astrology freaks would probably point to that last part as proof astrology works.
Yeah, as bits of you fly away from the planet.C.S.Strowbridge wrote:But your horiscope would more likely be, 'Today is a good day for business. Look out for the beginnings of a new romantic relationship with a Virgo, or possibly a Tarus. Travel is in your future!'Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Not really. if your horoscope said "Today is a bad day for you. Basically you're fucked." And a 200 GT hit blew up your city, that would be a pretty accurate prediction, no?data_link wrote:
No, he mans astrologiaclly. After all, a 200 GT blast could make your horiscope even more inaccurate than it already is.
And the Astrology freaks would probably point to that last part as proof astrology works.
You do realize that Loser099 is completely wrong, right? It's not clear from your post.Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:A 200 GT blast, or as Lord Edam called it in his debate with Mike, a Base Delta Zero, is explained in his part. Of course, his deals with several smaller blasts spread throught the surface of a planet, instead of one concentrated blast.
Or, to be simple, use that famous quote from Loser099: "That much power would be able to destroy a planet in a single shot"