Cult of the Wong

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-12-01 03:35pm

We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2002-12-01 03:36pm

NO. Trekkies aready accuse us of wacking it to wong, don't give them napalm to fuel their stupidity.

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 03:38pm

Mike is great and powerful, but my moral/Mad Dictator Codes require only me too worship myself and I worship no one else. It's an ok idea unless Wong uses his cult too take over.....

Canada! Muwhahaha.

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 03:39pm

Wait , nevermind AnarchistBunny has an intelligent idea. What a surprise indeed.

Cal Wright · Post by **Cal Wright** » 2002-12-01 03:42pm

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2002-12-01 03:43pm

Captain Lennox wrote:Wait , nevermind AnarchistBunny has an intelligent idea. What a surprise indeed.

Evil Sadistic Bastard · Post by **Evil Sadistic Bastard** » 2002-12-01 03:43pm

I worship nobody.

But i respect Wong.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2002-12-01 03:45pm

I fear what would happen if Mike became a Small God. He might, you know, start causing members of Canadian parliment to die from terminal stupidity.

Evil Sadistic Bastard · Post by **Evil Sadistic Bastard** » 2002-12-01 03:47pm

data_link wrote:We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?

Sounds like the Disciples of Wong.

But what rituals will there be? the ritual sacrifice and slaying of a troll to appease him? THe convocation to summon his aid against Darkstar clones?

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-12-01 03:48pm

Think of it this way: the more we deny that we worship Wong, the more DarkStar and his ilk claim that we do, and we lose credibility from it. On the other hand if we freely admit that we worship Wong, that takes the "deluded warsie" claims right out of his mouth, because we will be freely admitting it, and then it will no longer be an issue in debate, thus allowing us to focus on whowing everyone how utterly stupid he is.

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 03:49pm

anarchistbunny wrote:
Captain Lennox wrote:Wait , nevermind AnarchistBunny has an intelligent idea. What a surprise indeed.

You piss on Jango Fett! Infidel! I'll send the Clone Army, Boba Fett, and Jango Part 1 the Head, and Part 2 the Body toioo kick those squirrels' asses!

Evil Sadistic Bastard · Post by **Evil Sadistic Bastard** » 2002-12-01 03:50pm

data_link wrote:Think of it this way: the more we deny that we worship Wong, the more DarkStar and his ilk claim that we do, and we lose credibility from it. On the other hand if we freely admit that we worship Wong, that takes the "deluded warsie" claims right out of his mouth, because we will be freely admitting it, and then it will no longer be an issue in debate, thus allowing us to focus on whowing everyone how utterly stupid he is.

I personally prefer to show my appreciation for Darkstar's comments with a bunch of flowers.

Shoved up his nose.

And a nice healthy dose of burning petrol.

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2002-12-01 03:50pm

They are monkeys dumbass.

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-12-01 03:51pm

Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:
data_link wrote:We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?
Sounds like the Disciples of Wong.

But what rituals will there be? the ritual sacrifice and slaying of a troll to appease him? THe convocation to summon his aid against Darkstar clones?

Leave rituals out of it. We're forming a cult, not a religion.

Oh by the way - the ten commandments of the Cult of the Wong:

1. Thou shalt debate in a rational fashon
2. When thou art wrong, thou shalt concede defeat
3. Thou shalt support your arguments
4. Thou shalt not use fallacies
5. Thou shalt not blaspheme the LORD Wong
6. Thou shalt not defend nor hold the doctirine of creationism
7. Thou shalt have a love of Star Wars and anal sex
8. Thou shalt have a sense of humor
9. Thou shalt not spam
10. Thou shalt ruthlessy flame all those who do not keep these commandments.

What do you think?

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-01 03:52pm

It implies that we follow blindly without thinking for ourselves.

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-01 03:52pm

It implies that we follow blindly without thinking for ourselves. Something that is so annoying in rabid Trekkies.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-12-01 03:53pm

What the fuck are you guys smoking? You're going to blindly follow someone without evaluating what they say, first? Obviously, no human--including Mike Wong--is infallible. Besides, he probably doesn't even want people to be blindly worshipping him without examining his results, because to do so is to disregard the scientific principles that he believes in.

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-12-01 03:55pm

Master of Ossus wrote:What the fuck are you guys smoking? You're going to blindly follow someone without evaluating what they say, first? Obviously, no human--including Mike Wong--is infallible. Besides, he probably doesn't even want people to be blindly worshipping him without examining his results, because to do so is to disregard the scientific principles that he believes in.

Whoa now. I said we'd be worshipping him - nowhere did I say that we're going to blindly follow them without evaluating their statements. You can worship someone without believing them to be infallible.

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 03:56pm

anarchistbunny wrote:They are monkeys dumbass.

But they moderatly look squirrels. Anyways, squirrels would be more funny then monkeys.*Changes the tainted Avatar*

Evil Sadistic Bastard · Post by **Evil Sadistic Bastard** » 2002-12-01 03:58pm

data_link wrote:

Leave rituals out of it. We're forming a cult, not a religion.

Oh by the way - the ten commandments of the Cult of the Wong:

Be seated my children for we are gathered here to remember the tenets of our order.

1. Thou shalt debate in a rational fashon

For it is praise to Lord Wong, whose reason is impugnable.

2. When thou art wrong, thou shalt concede defeat

Let us not commit the sin of hanging on like stubborn pieces of shit.

3. Thou shalt support your arguments

For without support thine arguments are so much bullshit.

4. Thou shalt not use fallacies

For as Lord Wong speaks only Reason, so shall we, his disciples, speak only Reason.

5. Thou shalt not blaspheme the LORD Wong

For verily, the Lord Wong is the voice of Reason, and to blaspheme the Lord Wong is to blaspheme Reason.

6. Thou shalt not defend nor hold the doctirine of creationism

For the belief in Creationism is the first step to Stupidity.

7. Thou shalt have a love of Star Wars and anal sex

For as the Lord does, his Disciples shall follow.

8. Thou shalt have a sense of humor

For the worst trolls are those that take thineselves too seriously.

9. Thou shalt not spam

For it is sinful in the eyes of the Lord.

10. Thou shalt ruthlessy flame all those who do not keep these commandments.

For they have forgotten the face of their Father.

What do you think?

In the name of Reason, Logic and Intelligence, we commend our message board into the hands of the Lord.

Amen.

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 03:59pm

data_link wrote:
Master of Ossus wrote:What the fuck are you guys smoking? You're going to blindly follow someone without evaluating what they say, first? Obviously, no human--including Mike Wong--is infallible. Besides, he probably doesn't even want people to be blindly worshipping him without examining his results, because to do so is to disregard the scientific principles that he believes in.
Whoa now. I said we'd be worshipping him - nowhere did I say that we're going to blindly follow them without evaluating their statements. You can worship someone without believing them to be infallible.

yes, but Trekkies could say it appeals too Deity worship.

Anarchist Bunny · Post by **Anarchist Bunny** » 2002-12-01 04:08pm

DAMN IT! You win Lennox, I can have the monkeys peeing on Number Two, you devilishly cleaver bastard.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-01 04:29pm

No...I mean I respect the man and all the work he's put into it, but worship?!

Why, again?

...given that rabid trekkies already consider this, I see no reason to feed their paranoia.

Evil Sadistic Bastard · Post by **Evil Sadistic Bastard** » 2002-12-01 04:30pm

Ghost Rider wrote:No...I mean I respect the man and all the work he's put into it, but worship?!

Why, again?

...given that rabid trekkies already consider this, I see no reason to feed their paranoia.

[Inquisitor]HERETICS! YOU SHALL BURN FOR YOUR BLASPHEMY!!!!![/Inquisitor]

(Just kidding)

Raptor 597 · Post by **Raptor 597** » 2002-12-01 04:31pm

anarchistbunny wrote:DAMN IT! You win Lennox, I can have the monkeys peeing on Number Two, you devilishly cleaver bastard.

Muwhaha. Don't forget about the mutated sea bass. I can lone you some.

*Programs seek and destroy of this pissing monkeys into the sea bass*

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Cult of the Wong

Cult of the Wong?

Cult of the Wong

The Wright Cult

Re: Cult of the Wong

Re: Cult of the Wong

Re: Cult of the Wong